Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Sikhs can never get their equal rights or independance as a minority in India by democractic means

Recommended Posts

If we analyse the situation how indian union is a mafia state run by corrupt brought out politicans, there is 0% of Sikhs or any other minorities having justice, equality or even freedom from the union. The mistake made in by the sikh leadership in 1947 was so deadly by not understanding and having the foresight that the once warring hindu kingdoms combined into one entity into an indian union it would then be controlled by a few elitist families who are the corrupt politicians controlling all the power and resources of that land and nation.

And if we look at history the only way Sikhs got power and put an end to injustice and tyranny on the community was through armed forces. Without such tools and option there is no way would indian govt just give up hold or grip on Khalistan by peaceful and democratic means by the ballot. We just have to look at kashmir to see what they do there even though most of he muslim population there who want out of the union by democratic means they get brutalised by the army and police.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hv it downloaded I can send u via whatsapp. message me ur no.
    • Anyone have this not on scribd?
    • It goes both ways. If you hear the Islamic narrative they also prob up Islamic invaders and rulers as benign. You should hear what they say about an invader like Muhammad Bin Qaasim who is hailed as a hero and who they claim just came to save a few Muslim women while the defender Raja Dahir is portrayed as an evil scheming, degenerate pervert. But historic Muslim sources like the Chachnama convey a different story and testify how the invading Muslim Arabs had taken thousands of Hindu Sindhi women back with them.    Or look at how they view Aurangzeb. They shamelessly justify his hate  and war crimes against the Hindus and Sikhs. Many even call him a Wali of Allah or a great saint much like how the Buddhists view King Ashok. He is universally respected by Sunni Muslims. He is basically the main reason why most Punjabi and Mirpuri Rajputs and Jatts are Muslims in Pakistan today.   The Hindu and Muslim grand narratives are very different. The Sikh grand narrative can best be read at the starting of Bhangu's Panth Prakash. Bhangu very elaborately explains the condition of India before Guru Nanak Dev ji took avtar and then what followed and how Sikhs got raaj by Vaheguru
    • see doing stuff like that is just stupid! but then again you cnt expect anything else from india.  marathas were deafed by afghans    but eventually without a doubt they took over india and made it into a hindu state again      iv heard that captain amrinder wanted to remove sikh ithiaas from punjab txt books? 
    • i really liked this movie    the last scene gave me goosbumps!        i wanna watch ajay devgans tanhaji next   
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use