Jump to content

Bhai Jodh Ji Ate Jhoot To Rid Of His Ego


N30S1NGH
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am not here to argue either way as already all the points which needs to be discussed are discussed and will let readers decide for themselves... like most old traditional gurmat approach gurmat approach is in stages - shariat, tariqat, marfat and hakikat.

All dharam have four layers/stages- Shariat, Tariqat, Marfat and Hakikat . Sikhi have same structure in stages (similar stages are discussed in anand karaj lavan)
At shariat layer of sikhi one takes admission to sikhi by taking amrit, by taking the physical initiation khanda batta da amrit and receiving naam amrit is quite important as it symbolizes that now student/shish/sikh has a guru/teacher in our case our guru is sri guru granth sahib ji and saints/panj pyares are guides just available for help between path of journey between you and your guru.
It's pretty common to see these days people(especially youths are spending their precious time in doubts/pondering/debating-winning arguments over policy(rehat details etc) just accept it and move on to different stages i.e - if one in marfat stage, one can transcendent on some of rituals in shariat (rehat) or one can keep them without paying any attention to them so much so not even one second or breath is spent pondering over the rituals in shariat layer because focus is actually on the adhyatam now.
Rehat maryada as it is supposed to free an individual not attach back to dogma..again nothing wrong with rehat maryada be it bibek, chalisa itself but if caution is not paid in the mindset same thing could be turned into dogma by individual.
Guru maharaj has provided his hand to them to get them out from web of trap in the first-shariat layer of sikhi by giving this vak:
All though originally updesh given to sharia panthi muslim of that time but gurbani is meant for everyone including off course sikhs, its fits perfectably looking at the sad state of affairs among holier than thou amritdharis.
Ang- 1083
saraa sareeath lae ka(n)maavahu ||
Let your practice be to live the spiritual life.
thareekath tharak khoj ttolaavahu ||
Let your spiritual cleansing be to renounce the world and seek God.
maarafath man maarahu abadhaalaa milahu hakeekath jith fir n maraa ||3||
Let control of the mind be your spiritual wisdom, O holy man; meeting with God, you shall never die again. ||3|
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/3516-amazing-sakhi-bhai-jodh-singh/

Was no controversy before, why now? Let's not be so paranoid of our Sikh ithihaas, but instead ask for historical proof in a more positive manner. Negativity is seeping from your posts on this thread bro.

I have asked for proof in a positive manner here it is the first time and second time:

"I would be very careful of taking this story as true without any real proof to say it actually happen."

"Thank you for providing the Vaar again, but I read the Vaar before writing on this discussion and Bhai Gurdas Ji Vaar does not say anything about Bhai Jodh eating jhoot of another. Instead we have Hukams telling us not to eat Jhoot. A deeper look at Gurbani needs to be conducted here so a clearer picture can be developed. So far the main point that others want to reflect as the truth has not been substantiated. "

I ask for a deeper look into Gurbani. I cannot get anymore positive than asking for Gurbani.

Lastly, if you look at who was the aggressor here it is without any doubt the poster n30 who cannot see past the fact that not everyone is a Christian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some who prowl this forum to spoil threads. Sikhs used to partake charan amrit

till tenth master.Missionaries mock it and propagate against it.

So ignore such elements and continue the discussion.

Sikhism is not Gurbani only.It is a combination of Gurbani, our history and traditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some who prowl this forum to spoil threads. Sikhs used to partake charan amrit

till tenth master.Missionaries mock it and propagate against it.

So ignore such elements and continue the discussion.

Sikhism is not Gurbani only.It is a combination of Gurbani, our history and traditions.

So what have you done to counter the missionaries in the above stated aspect? Have you taken any actions against them to educate or prevent further damage from occurring?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what have you done to counter the missionaries in the above stated aspect? Have you taken any actions against them to educate or prevent further damage from occurring?

Missionaries and others masquerading as Sikhs have no substance in them. They deny mystic aspects of sikh , sikh history and say

Guru sahibs are dead persons and no need to accord respect them.

There were plenty here on this forum causing every doubt on sikh history,rejecting sakhis etc. They could not withstand logic and fled.

WE still do get them off and on but at best they have nuisance value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Missionaries and others masquerading as Sikhs have no substance in them. They deny mystic aspects of sikh , sikh history and say

Guru sahibs are dead persons and no need to accord respect them.

There were plenty here on this forum causing every doubt on sikh history,rejecting sakhis etc. They could not withstand logic and fled.

WE still do get them off and on but at best they have nuisance value.

I do appreciate your efforts to discuss and shine light on how missionaries do not have sound logic in their beliefs. But I get the impression you are also referring to me as a missionary. Am I accurate about your belief on me?

I hope you are not wanting me to accept the sakhi in discussion blindly. If you can do a better job at explaining and providing proof than the one person who just resorts to name calling. I would be very thankful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do appreciate your efforts to discuss and shine light on how missionaries do not have sound logic in their beliefs. But I get the impression you are also referring to me as a missionary. Am I accurate about your belief on me?

I hope you are not wanting me to accept the sakhi in discussion blindly. If you can do a better job at explaining and providing proof than the one person who just resorts to name calling. I would be very thankful

Sakhi are part and parcel of sikhism. What does not sound logical to you in this sakhi?

Do you accept that sikhs were initiated in sikhi By Guru sahib by charan amrit? Or it sounds

not correct to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guru Ke Piaraio

Is questioning each others commitment productive??

Can we not have a sensible discussion without personal attacks??

This forum has absolutely no purpose if the administration of it is not regulated.....we are Sikhs of the Khalsa Panth!!!!!!

Yet bicker about each others differing interpretation of the one thought.

Two people will not necessarily agree on the colour of a dawn sky......so wether we can agree on a single interpretation of any Gurbani or Sakhi is nigh on impossible.

Sikhi is thought.......a thought is so infinitely complex an individual will struggle to explain it without sounding either too shallow or over jargonised.

Sikh's squabbling over EVERY little minor thing is absolutely pitiful.

Theres no difference between this forum and the "we love (insert football team name)fc site".

Those mature enough will understand my point.......the unfortunates are welcome to attack me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use