Jump to content

Sikh views parallel to envisioned pantheistic God of Baruch Spinoza??


M4A6
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, M4A6 said:

Quick google search will answer that question. He was a philosopher.

Yes, I know about google and understand your point

But if posting on a forum, it would be good to actually give some pertinent detail first so that others don't need to google it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/20/2021 at 10:15 AM, M4A6 said:

Just wondering how sikhi parallels to the gods believed to exist by great minds such as einstein.

Does sikhi concept of god the same as the one thought of by Baruch Spinoza??

To answer your question...google it...

Jk

First. It's Sikhi or Gursikhi. 

Second. Gods? 1 Oankar. 

Third. The Gurus Mind is great not Einstein's by any comparison. 

Fourth. This man came after the Guru Sahiban. 

Fifth. I think Gursikhi is more likened to panenthiesm than pantheism. 

What were the thoughts of this intellectual great on the Dutch Congo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Premi5 said:

Yes, I know about google and understand your point

But if posting on a forum, it would be good to actually give some pertinent detail first so that others don't need to google it

Its an entire philosipher with thousands of pages of writing you want me to copy paste a wikapedia article here? Im not asking a quick question and if you dont know about him and are not willing to learn you should not answer based of a quick few sentences i would have wrote.

 

2 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

To answer your question...google it...

Jk

First. It's Sikhi or Gursikhi. 

Second. Gods? 1 Oankar. 

Third. The Gurus Mind is great not Einstein's by any comparison. 

Fourth. This man came after the Guru Sahiban. 

Fifth. I think Gursikhi is more likened to panenthiesm than pantheism. 

What were the thoughts of this intellectual great on the Dutch Congo?

Plural gods as in several different concepts of 1 Onkar.

Third, no The gurus mind is not 'great' they does not possess things such as a humand mind. No comparison can be made dont be silly.

Fourth this point has no correlation to anything. Ok i understand, but it answers no question and envokes no discussion.

Fith - This is a difficult point to discuss but i guess so - einstein did not believe in theories such as many worlds interpretation or parralel universes, except mirror universes. But Many Worlds Theory was largely compiled after his death so his opinions on this would be difficult to guess. He did call the universe an expression of God though.

Why must he be silly? I didnt see you writing papers from general relativity to special relativity (which he didnt actually get nobel prizes in, he was awarded a nobel prize for photoelectric effect however because relativity was so contriversial) the man was a special mind. You can not deny it.

 

I am extremely dissapointed with the overall comments from this forum i must say i expected much much more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, M4A6 said:

Its an entire philosipher with thousands of pages of writing you want me to copy paste a wikapedia article here? Im not asking a quick question and if you dont know about him and are not willing to learn you should not answer based of a quick few sentences i would have wrote.

 

Plural gods as in several different concepts of 1 Onkar.

Third, no The gurus mind is not 'great' they does not possess things such as a humand mind. No comparison can be made dont be silly.

Fourth this point has no correlation to anything. Ok i understand, but it answers no question and envokes no discussion.

Fith - This is a difficult point to discuss but i guess so - einstein did not believe in theories such as many worlds interpretation or parralel universes, except mirror universes. But Many Worlds Theory was largely compiled after his death so his opinions on this would be difficult to guess. He did call the universe an expression of God though.

Why must he be silly? I didnt see you writing papers from general relativity to special relativity (which he didnt actually get nobel prizes in, he was awarded a nobel prize for photoelectric effect however because relativity was so contriversial) the man was a special mind. You can not deny it.

 

I am extremely dissapointed with the overall comments from this forum i must say i expected much much more.

Bro. 

You need to google words like Granth and start over. 

We like our guests saltier and less informed. Sorry. 

Good luck. Lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree we're not born with sin like the Christians think. Also I agree we have effects of karma. But Gurbani does state that the body contains both sin and charity (goodness): ਕਾਇਆ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਪਾਪੁ ਪੁੰਨੁ ਦੁਇ ਭਾਈ ॥ Within the body are the two brothers sin and virtue. p126 Actually, we do need to be saved. Gurbani calls this "udhaar" (uplift). Without Satguru, souls are liable to spiritual death: ਜਿਨਾ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨ ਭੇਟਿਓ ਸੇ ਭਾਗਹੀਣ ਵਸਿ ਕਾਲ ॥ p40 Those who have not met Satguru Purakh are unfortunate and liable to death. So, yeah, we do need to be saved, and Guru ji does the saving. The reason Satguru is the one to save is because God has given Satguru the "key" (kunji): ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਥਿ ਕੁੰਜੀ ਹੋਰਤੁ ਦਰੁ ਖੁਲੈ ਨਾਹੀ ਗੁਰੁ ਪੂਰੈ ਭਾਗਿ ਮਿਲਾਵਣਿਆ ॥੭॥ In the True Guru's hand is the key. None else can open the door. By perfect good fortune the Guru is met. p124
    • That's unfortunate to hear. Could you give any more information? Who was this "baba"? He just disappeared with people's money? Obviously, you should donate your money to known institutions or poor people that you can verify the need of through friends and family in Punjab.
    • Sangat ji,  I know a family who went Sevewal to do seva sometimes end of 2019. They returned last year in great dismay and heart broken.  To repent for their mistakes they approached panj pyaare. The Panj gave them their punishment / order to how t make it up which, with Kirpa, they fulfilled.  They were listening to a fake Baba who, in the end, took all the "Donations " and fled sometime over a year ago. For nearly 4 years this family (who are great Gursikhs once u get to know them) wasted time and effort for this fake Baba. NOT ONLY this one fam. But many, many did worldwide and they took their fam to do seva, in village Sevewal, city Jaitho in Punjab. In the end many families lost money in thousands being behind this Baba. The family, on return, had to get in touch with all the participants and told them to stop.  I am stating this here to create awareness and we need to learn from whom we follow and believe. It's no easy but if we follow the 3 S (Sangat, Simran and Seva) we will be shown the light. As I am writing this the family in question have been doing the same since 2008 onwards and they fell for this Baba... it is unbelievable and shocking.  This am writing in a nutshell as am at work on my break so not lengthy but it deserves a great length.  Especially the family in question, who shed light on youngsters about Sikhi 20 plus years!! 
    • Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi Kalan uses simple Punjabi.
    • Leaving aside Guru ji, the general question of taking afeem (opium) in limited quantities for war/medical wounds is simply unproblematic. When you go to the hospital, they give you morphine. What do you think morphine is? It's an opiate. Even codeine (cough syrup) is an opiate! Ever had a cough? Granted, it is against Gurmat to take opium or other drugs for the fun of it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use