Jump to content

Anglo Sikh Heritage Week


killah
 Share

Recommended Posts

On the 18 Sep there is a presentation @ the British Library. The British Library has been described as : "Home of the greatest collection of Sikh and Punjabi Manuscripts outside India".

Are "manuscripts" described the the Saroops of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj that the British Library have in their possesion? I remember a few years ago they had Maharaj's Saroop on display in a glass cabinet. I know some campaign was started against this, what happened? Are the Saroops still in the Library?

I found these old threads..

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?showtopic=6576&hl=

"the British Library has 53 GurMukhi Scriptures and 17 Guru Granth Sahib Ji Saroops in their storage vaults."

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?showtopic=6332&hl=

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These pictures were on the previous threads back in 2004. This is major stuff, if the British Library have Maharaj's Saroops in their possesion and they do not have any satkar for the Saroops! The Saroop of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji is in a glass cabinet in the Library! What is going on!! The Saroop is supposed to be from 17th Centuary.

British Library Sikh Display 2004.

post-5283-1157978952.jpg

post-5283-1157978994.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the 18 Sep there is a presentation @ the British Library. The British Library has been described as : "Home of the greatest collection of Sikh and Punjabi Manuscripts outside India".

Are "manuscripts" described the the Saroops of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj that the British Library have in their possesion? I remember a few years ago they had Maharaj's Saroop on display in a glass cabinet. I know some campaign was started against this, what happened? Are the Saroops still in the Library?

I found these old threads..

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?showtopic=6576&hl=

"the British Library has 53 GurMukhi Scriptures and 17 Guru Granth Sahib Ji Saroops in their storage vaults."

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?showtopic=6332&hl=

I remember this well! How foolish can we be to allow the some of the most puratan Saroops of Maharaj be stored in a library? Well ASHT was working with BL to implement procedures to sadkar of Maharaj at the library. Any comments ASHT? Will we seen Maharaj saroops on display in glass cabinets on the 18th?

We need to start a discussion with BL now.

post-1670-1157979776.jpg

post-1670-1157979833.jpg

post-1670-1157979846.jpg

post-1670-1157979871.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel very uncomfortable about this issue. I mean we go around attempting to stop the beadbi of Guru Ji's Saroop, but how come we have not dealt with this problem. I always wondered if Libraries would have Guru Ji's Saroop on their premises. I am shocked to see that even British MPs supported the Sikh community on this issue.

What was thr outcome then? I take it the Saroops are still in the vaults of the British Library!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use