imhosingh

Pingalwara ..directly or the donation box at park avenue

How do you know this? Do you sit there with him while he meditates? When you say he is religious, do you know what is going on in his head? What you know about him comes through the 'prism' of the media and stuff produced by other people who you don't know. Its a bit hard to be pious when you've been a serial cheater, defrauded people, coveted other peoples wealth and got an ego that seeks power.

To join the army, police or any other role of standing, you have background checks done. Heck, even to help out at schools you need a DBS check. So to join the Khalsa, why aren't there checks? This guys history was known, so why weren't checks done to stop him taking Amrit? Likewise in the 'services' (The Khalsa is a service to humanity), if people are under investigation or on trial they are 'suspended' until the outcome is arrived at. Where was the local committee/gurdwara which allowed him to take Amrit when the investigations started? Were they too busy counting their building funds? This isn't a new thing, too many nutjobs over the years have been allowed to take Amrit and then further down the line they bring the whole thing into disrepute.

Any publicly available records with address details (electoral roll, companies house info, specific internet search results etc) of this loser, would have been removed either before or after sentencing. Its common practice to protect the families of offenders so that they don't get retribution. You'll also find that organised criminals don't provide easy to trace records for the public to access.

The bloke is a loser and only took on the 'disguise' of sikhi when the heat was on. Is this loser any different to the Muslim groomers who when the heat is on suddenly turn all 'religious' on the outside? They all tend to have a warped view of the world where they seem to think that doing a 'transaction' with god will get them off punishment. I've come across a few criminal types in the past who suddenly changed appearance when the authorities were closing in ..inside they were still the same, and often it was way of them fooling themselves that it wasn't them who did the crimes (as they looked different then). Basically they have a messed up mentality that will do anything to save their own skin.

If you had the cure to 'cancer' you'd better start work on a cure to dementia, Alzheimers , arthritis, atherosclerosis and all the other ailments associated with old age. I read a good article once about how the success of modern medicine has not actually over the whole of a persons life improved the 'quality of life ' much when you factor in the years of life at the end when you are afflicted with such conditions

Sorry to break it to you but when you have the resources of a whole country doing pretty much one thing you can achieve anything. One of the big mysteries was how did the big granite blocks get to the Pyramid sites? Well a recent dig down the Nile discovered tombs of the people involved in the transportation of the blocks. The found old scrolls with images of the blocks being put on boats to be transported up the nile. The egyptians flooded areas around the pyramid sites so they became 'ports' for those boats. There was no description of 'aliens' or other amazing future tech re. how they transported the blocks. It was quite mundane, just simple boats, with one block on them.

Old people generally don't give a hoot about their impact on people. Once you get over 60 you have all manner of ills (constant aches and pains, problems urinatinating, hormones are lower/imbalanced, you see the end on the horizon, people you like/peers have passed away etc). Are they on any meds (statins, blood pressure etc) these can affect mood too. Generally, lots of the older people i've know have a few underlying aches/pains (makes people grumpy), they are quite lonely inside (loss of siblings/parents/friends so there is fewer people they 'deeply' connect with) and they start to look back on their lives and how they wasted certain aspects of it. You should ask them whats on their mind

Most humans look up to their oppressors. Sad but true.

As part of a low carb/sugar diet don't touch 'diet' drinks with sugar substitutes. There is plenty of research that they mess up your body even more. They trigger your body to expect 'sugar' (so the body releases hormones and mechanisms to process that sugar) but when the body doesn't find the sugar the feedback loop gets broken and then you seek 'proper' sugar to compensate. To avoid diabetes (type 2) you need to match your calories to your activity (if overweight lose weight), also avoid Carbs (substitute for low carb alternatives i.e. potatoes for things like Celeriac ). Carb/Starchy foods are broken down into sugar by the body and modern 'wheats', 'rices' etc have been bred for high energy yields. If you get Type2 the only way to reverse it is to radically drop your calorie intake over a prolonged period of time, this will reset the body (once again lots of medical literature on how 'fasting' can reverse type2)

If you don't want bad behaviour from your kids, don't feed it with your own bad behaviour. If a kid is having a screaming mental fit, don't shout at them as that just feeds their anger. I'd suggest just walk away nonchalantly like you aren't going to react to such behaviour. The child will run out of steam before you. Do that a few times and they will realise that screaming etc won't get them what they want and that you won't conceed. Do it consistently and you'll be surprised by the results. Yes, It does work, as I do it with my kids. Angry shouty kids most of the time reflect angry shouty parents. I know its hip to see kids as 'equals' to the adults, but if you want a peaceful life you have to let them know who is boss, set boundaries, and that you can't be manipulated by their behaviours. Oh and don't think this will make them not 'love' you because you aren't caving in, they will still do so (actually even more) Look at it like energy, if you react to angry energy with 'anger' you feed the anger. The best way to deal with it is to deflect it (not absorb it). We all have stories of the chappal whacks, but if it was so effective why did we get whacked so often? After a while it didn't hurt.

Canada is different to the UK in one major respect. It is not £1.5tn in debt to big global financial firms/other governments. Politicians in the UK can do very little as they have no money to spend and what money they can spend has to be in line with what their lenders agree too (if the politicians decide to say decrease spend on HS2 and divert that to the NHS they will basically push up the cost of their borrowing/default on borrowing covenants). The UK government has a credit rating which it has to maintain otherwise politicians can't borrow money (and keep themselves in office). Thats why politics is a waste of time, unless you want to make changes on a low level like reducing plastic bag use. Politicians are their for ego, and the higher you go the more you realise how powerless you are. If you want to change Britain, become a billionaire and then use that money to buy politicians/gang up with other billionairres/firms to tell the government what to do.

What do you think people from India think when they come over here to stay around December 25th? They would find it weird that all these 'sikhs' are running around like fools trying to get 'presents' for people then feasting on the birth day of Jesus....isn't that weird? Or how about around 'easter' time when 'sikhs' buy easter eggs for the kids. If you live in a hindu majority country, where the hindus run things its more than likely that 'sikhs' will out of their own ego (want to be part of the dominant group) or miseducation will get involved with Hindu traditions. No doubt in time (well they already kiss up to those in power) of established sikhs in places like Dubair, soon they'll be celebrating 'eid' because its the thing to do there.

The Muslims have their own 'raj' so they have powerbases around the world. We have no state or basis for leverage. Cucking also gets the cuckers ££ and social standing with those they want to impress. Aterall would any right minded person take a title or 'pat on the back' from institutions that killed your ancestors and have led to so many problems that still exist today? No, but look at that long line of cuckers wanting their mbes, obes etc from the establishment. African Americans have the term 'uncle Tom' we have plenty of those leading us. Look at the critique of them and you'll see parallels with us

Intellectuals like to talk because they have no power to make things happen. Its about balance isn't it, look at our committees. They aren't filled with intellectuals, but those who will do whatever it takes to get and maintain their 'positions'. Ever been around our 'community' elders after they've had a few drinks? They suddenly become intellectual giants on all topics, so to say we are un-intellectual is doing those folks a disservice.

Do you think that if hindu rulers had absolute control of India in the past they would have been kind to Sikhs and other minorities? Those who seek and want to maintain power will do what is necessary for it. Imagine if some Hindu ruler controlled most of India in the past and along comes a group that says things like 'caste' are nonsense and that everyone is equal. Do you think that group would have been allowed to flourish without impediment (challenging the fundamentals of the ruler's power and authority system?). There never has been any inter-generational golden age where one group has majority control and treated smaller groups equally. Its not just an India problem its a human problem, a good example is Marcus Aurelius (the emperor in Gladiator that Russell Crowes character wants serve , defend and preserve his values). Read his 'Meditations' and its all very noble and great, but in reality even that Philosopher King presided over an empire that wasn't kind to many groups/peoples.

DNA of populations changes slowly over thousands of years. Food genetics over a mass market can change within weeks. For example your average apple today is completely different to one from a decade ago or say 40yrs ago. Modern apples are sweeter and designed for shelf life and mass transportation. That daal you eat today is a different pulse to the one eaten by your ancestors (green Revolution and modern GM techniques). Same goes for all foods unless you are talking about fish from the sea which haven't been genetically altered (farm fish have). So that's the dirty secret of many of today's ills our genes are designed for food types over thousands of years but now our bodies are exposed to different foods from around the world and the food we think we are used to is actually alien to our genes.

Here's something to try which was told to me years ago. Meditate and search inwards for 'you', that 'unique you' that you hold dear and all that. Really search inside for that special 'me' 'you' thing. It's quite profound because when you go looking for 'me' it's nowhere to be found...there is a nothingness . It's what the world trys to get you to forget with all the other baggage strapped on as you go along the journey. Once you strip it all away there is no 'you'

How about shes got a bit of a screw loose and does this crazy thing because she is basically crazy. In India there are over 1bn people. If 0.0001% of the indian population are absolutely weird and do nutty things then you have 100,000 who would do such things. Now in your circle of people you know how many are nutjobs ? I'm sure it's a lot more than .0001% of them So, apply that to a large population and you have plenty of nuts who will Do weird or crazy things . People are strange

Britain since ww2 has culturally and economically shifted towards being like the USA (modernity = the west = the USA ). Is the USA a bastion of law abiding strong civil society? Not really. Crime is no worse than yesteryear, it's just that you now hear about it much more and the various media avenues amplify it more. It's also harder to cover up crime these days . Would the likes of saville get away with it today? Don't be afraid of what the media pumps out as scared population is easier to manipulate for Draconian policies . The biggest issue is that police and judicial numbers are down and since the 1990s the UK population has increased by 30 percent so you do the math of the liklihood of being caught and punished if you commit a crime.

I'd chill if i was you. All of these things can be looked upon as 'games' played by ' characters' with little consideration for collateral damage. You see all this warmongering etc..it's necessary for the system to work. You always need viable threats to maintain the budgets and powers of the systems. The USA spends 100s of billions a year on defence and intel, do you think that would be viable in a peaceful world? As for the games between politicians it's a sham, most of the time they behind the scenes get on and know what the game is about. Those faces you see on TV don't actually have any power it's the ones behind them who stay regardless of who is perceived to the the leader. If everyone knew that the politicians were powerless, the plebs would stop voting and giving legitimacy to the system, things would start to crumble. I'll give you an example, do you ever wonder why the government of the UK keeps on selling public assets and letting private entities take over things like the NHS? Well the UK government is heavily in debt and has to borrow billions from international institutions like BlackRock to keep things rolling. In order to get lower interest rates and make things seem normal in return the government has to sell assets to these institutions (via privatisation). The politicians are powerless because they just want illusion of power. Just like if you ever go to parliament or some of the social places near parliament you'll see that the politicians regardless of party off camera mingle and are friends, then on camera they just regurgitate a narrative given to them by advisors/their party/their backers. It's a game that's all it is to them .

Do some voluntary work.. The habit you may want to break is not having something to get up for and commitments (after all thats the reason many people get up for work in the morning, to avoid being reprimanded etc). Charity shops are always looking for volunteers as are places like care homes. In the past with my IT skills I volunteered at an old peoples home to show the people how to use the internet, video calling etc. There are plenty of volunteer jobs with mental health charities too. Volunteering also looks good on CV

What Britain does in the future will be governed by this lot https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228354-500-revealed-the-capitalist-network-that-runs-the-world/ not what the people want. Trade deals etc will be negotiated to please the masters detailed in that analysis . You also have to consider that Britain is 1.5tn in debt (to those same mega financial institutions), so as with most entities that are in debt will do what the lender says. Oh to put it into context that debt is the equivalent of 1.5 million stacks of £1m.

Is there a wage cap on pacharaks? If they are based in London do they get a bonus in light of it being more expensive to live there? Also the mentality about dissing gay people is out of order. If people are gay (wired that way) they will have the same challenge as the rest of us to keep lust at bay. The worst thing is to encourage closet folks into marriage which destroys not just the spouse but also any resulting kids

Sorry to break this to you but if you don't know Jagmeet personally how you can judge him? Afterall, all you know is the 'image' portrayed of him. For all politicians (and rising ones) this image is carefully nurtured by a political party machine. They get media training, coaching the whole shabang, so in effect they become like actors in a role. Would you vote for Jamie foxx because he played the US president in 'White house down'? What politcians say and don't say in public is governed by what their advisors tell them will appeal to voters they want. If Politicians could make a difference, how come after almost 100 years since universal suffrage in places like Canada, UK, US etc, they are still not amazing utopias, even though every politician who seeks office promises a better tomorrow, then 4-5 yrs later after winning power, the next person comes along and offers a better tomorrow, because society has got worse. There is a 'system' and the system continues despite the different faces on the puppets in office