Jump to content

RADIO DISCUSSION - BBC ASIANNETWORK - NOW!


Recommended Posts

The Muslim representative kept saying "we should unite - we are all British Asians"

Jagtar Singh, "I am not Asian. I am British Sikh. I am born in Europe, hold a British passport and am a Sikh - so I am British Sikh"

Muslim rep: "No! We are all Asian... we should unite... racists will not see that you are Sikh, Hindu or Muslim - we are all the same, we are targets of racism"

Jagtar Singh highlighted that the Muslim rep was born in East Africa - so how does he become "British Asian"???

Other points highlighted in the show by presenters and listeners:

- "Asians" technically involves Russians, Arabs, Chinese etc... why are they not labelled by the government and media as "Asians" and no-one makes a hoo-haa... but when Sikhs ask to be called "Sikhs" and not "Asians" then people make a big deal

- Govt. Rep = there will be too many option boxes on the form if we add Sikhs on it - then Irish will want a box, Scottish, Welsh etc.

- British Govt. recognised Sikhs as a distinct ethnic group and race in 1983

- Sikhs are distinct and not the same as Hindus and Muslims as the pro-Asian label person was saying. We have turban and beard! So yes a person can tell that we are different from the rest of Asian communities.

- If we were recognised by media and government as a separate identity (away from Asians) then public would become more aware of Sikhs and government can properly monitor and provide needs specific to the Sikh community.

- "All Sikhs are are British Asians"... Jagtar Singh - "So I a White Sikh living in UK is "British Asian"?"

- Muslims want to use label Asians for themselves and others (like Hindus and Muslims) to share the load and shame caused by extremist Muslims across the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jagtar Singh, "I am not Asian.  I am British Sikh.  I am born in Europe, hold a British passport and am a Sikh - so I am British Sikh"

Other points highlighted in the show by presenters and listeners:

- "Asians" technically involves Russians, Arabs, Chinese etc... why are they not labelled by the government and media as "Asians" and no-one makes a hoo-haa... but when Sikhs ask to be called "Sikhs" and not "Asians" then people make a big deal

- British Govt. recognised Sikhs as a distinct ethnic group and race in 1983

- Sikhs are distinct and not the same as Hindus and Muslims as the pro-Asian label person was saying.  We have turban and beard! So yes a person can tell that we are different from the rest of Asian communities.

- If we were recognised by media and government as a separate identity (away from Asians) then public would become more aware of Sikhs and government can properly monitor and provide needs specific to the Sikh community.

- "All Sikhs are are British Asians"... Jagtar Singh - "So I a White Sikh living in UK is "British Asian"?"

- Muslims want to use label Asians for themselves and others (like Hindus and Muslims) to share the load and shame caused by extremist Muslims across the world.

92170[/snapback]

sooooooooo true!

every time i have to fill out some form i never tick the asian box, i tick other and write Sikh, that's what many Sikhs done also during the census thing so many years ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jagtar Paaji is a truely wonderful Gursikh who always manages to put across his points!

Unfortunately, I was at work, so could not listen in... however, one thing I shall say is that - We are not Britsh Asians, as paaji said, we are British Sikhs - please all, push this as an Identity where you can.

When filling in forms, we are not "asian other" we are "other" - SIKH.

Sikhs are one of the most hardworking communities in Britain, Sikhs gave their lives for this country for the freedom of her people, we not only want but now NEED to be monitored as a seperate identity, so that as taxpaying Sikh citezens of the UK can have the same rights as all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jagtar Paaji is a truely wonderful Gursikh who always manages to put across his points!

Unfortunately, I was at work, so could not listen in... however, one thing I shall say is that - We are not Britsh Asians, as paaji said, we are British Sikhs - please all, push this as an Identity where you can.

When filling in forms, we are not "asian other" we are "other" - SIKH.

Sikhs are one of the most hardworking communities in Britain, Sikhs gave their lives for this country for the freedom of her people, we not only want but now NEED to be monitored as a seperate identity, so that as taxpaying Sikh citezens of the UK can have the same rights as all.

92180[/snapback]

Agree, my last job application I put Other - Sikh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are a religion, nation and people.

Sikhs:

- distinct way of life

- distinct appearance

- distinct sovereign authority and own flag

- distinct national anthem

- distinct history

- distinct democracy of the Khalsa Panth under the umbrella of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.

- distinct ruler - Sri GurU Granth Sahib Ji

- distinct high authority - Sri Akaal Takhat Sahib

<_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use