Jump to content

Obeying Akaal Takht


Nama Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

VJKK VJKF

I thought (correct me if im wrong!) that Akaal Takht a few years ago sent out an order to all Gurdwaras to remove tables n chair from their langar halls. So how comes not all Gurdwaras have obeyed this? How comes they r getting away with it????

105517[/snapback]

Maybe if more people went into these Gurdwaras on a regular basis and made a stand against it, ie, sit on the floor to eat despite tables and chairs even if their is no carpet.

If our own people refuse to make a change coz it is classed as "inconvenient" then how can we expect the Gurdwaras to implement chance as their main priority is to pull in the crowd and prehaps compete against the rest of them in the local area.

Apologies if anyone is offended my the post!

Personally, i prefer to sit on the floor to eat. I find it so much more comfortable then a table!!!

I think all Gurdwaras implemented the change when the hukham came, i remember it happening and the lack of sangat coz of it!!! But then all of a sudden they were coming back in..

Maybe a more pressing issue also is the wearing of shoes in the langar hall?? Not keeping your head covered too??

For once, if akaal takht sahib has issued a hukham, lets actually work on that!! And implement it as much as possible as opposed to worrying about how many other things are going on in the world!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WJKK WJKF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes the Akal Takht hukumnama are never enforced. You can do what you want and they will not take action. Tohra went to the nirankhari bhavan and Ranjit Singh lt him off. Badal and his wife get hawan performed and visit dere of anti Sikh godmen and they get away with it. Strict action need to be taken to liberate the Akal Takht form the clutches of the SGPC.

I was at Soho Road Gurdwara to attend a wedding several weeks ago. After the wedding guests had eat their samosa and barfi and gone into the durbar hall the langar hall was not cleared of tables and people continued to eat on them.

What surprised me even more was the attitude of the sevadaar there. They said women/girls could not put out the samosa etc (even though they were fresh from the shop and not been subject to Bhog). Great advert fro equality. Every "savadaar" who turned up would say do like this not like that, only for another sevadaar to come along a few minutes later to contradict what the earlier "sevadaar" had said. I think it became a case of too many chiefs trying to dominate people. The "sevadaar" rather than doing seva were trying to put royb on people and doing toka takai (nitpicking).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use