Jump to content

Sikhs after London Terrorist Attacks


Recommended Posts

As we all know after the terrible events of Thursday, London. Sikhs have yet fallen victim to mistaken identity. Various Sikhs have been assulted, A Gurudwara Sahib in Kent has been burnt. One Gurudwara in Bradford has tried to be burnt. Ever since thursday I have been listening to various news channels, reports and radio stations. IT IS CLEAR, THAT ALL THE MAIN POLITICIANS AND OTHER FIGURES HAVE TOTALLY IGNORED THE SIKHS. It as though SIKHS DONT EXIST. In my eyes everything + everyone has fail to highlight the Sikhs even though they are most likely to be attacked in mistake for some hardcore islamic fundamentalist.

I think rsinghs post about emailing and writing letters to the mayor of london & local mp is a good idea. Heres the link:

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?showtopic=12300

Also people get producing those leaflets and give your opinions and advice on the ones that are already uploaded. Heres the link:

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?showtopic=12285

I think we should also email major news channels and call into main radio stations and express our concerns for the Sikh community and how main politicians including ken livingstone have TOTALLY IGNORED the Sikh community as whole despite the attacks and what the Sikhs have done for the british.

Here are some email addresses of major news channels:

News@Sky.com (www.sky.com/skynews/home)

And I think BBC's is: news@bbc.co.uk ( I have been on thier site, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/default.stm) but can't find a relevant email contact address.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I just had to post this. Today I was watching the news, and it was amazing how they interviewed so many muslim organisations, and other relevant muslim people in the UK. Sky news also showed the 2/3 mosques that had been attacked. BUT HEY guess what. No mention of the 2/3 Gurudwaras that had been attacked. Again they were interviewing normal muslim people in birmingham...HMMM...YET AGINT NO SIKHS. It gets better in the houses of commons sada prime minister king of kn*bs tony blair didnt mention Sikhs once even though we are the most likely to be attacked. I have seen no statements from ANY Sikh organisation on the TV. I know Sikh Fed has released various statements. How comes they never have any one representing the Sikhs in the UK, is becuase our so called representatives cant be <admin-profanity filter activated>*d or they just been being out right ignored by the media aswell as the major politicians. We look like a total bunch of idiots, sorry to say. Any one have links to BBC hell get me on there. I think the only way we can get around this is to protest outside major tv stations like BBC main headquarters or the next time we clash with groups like the NF. What ur guys views? Do you think the our so called representatives are doing enough>?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use