Jump to content

Audio Of Prof.darshan Singh And Sant Ranjit Singh


guru fateh
 Share

Recommended Posts

i heard the audio file.. and i have to agree that prof. sahib really should have paitence while on radio talk.. Ranjit singh did good and also admitted that he did some stuff wrong and is taking step to improve.. Well not everyone is perfect but i have to give props to ranjit singh for his cool attitude while on radio..

I am not sure about the audio file link.. but im sure that i found the link meniotned somewhere sikh-history.com discussion forum :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fateh ji

where can i find the audio interview of prof.darshan singh withd sant ranjit singh?

128971[/snapback]

Fateh,

U can dl the full radio interview at the following address:

radio interview

Listen with an open mind with one underlying guiding principle...that any claim one makes in the realm of Dharam, should always be supported and in agreement with that written in gurbani

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, this radio talk show should not have taken place. If both of these guys had something agaist each other they should have resolved it when Bhai Ranjit Singh visited canda. Its true that Ranjit Singh admitted what he did was wrong and did not know much at that time, but at the same time, if we take both of these guys' arguments, Prof. Darshan Singh had several valid points.

Prof. Darshan Singh asked Bhai Ranjit Singh not to go to any Deewan where there are posters that have "Sant Baba Ranjit Singh" on them and tell the organizers that he doesn't know who "Sant" Ranjit Singh is, I'm Bhai Ranjit Singh and therfore, I'm not coming to this deewan. Prof. asked Bhai Sahib to say these words several times in the talk show, but Bhai Ranjit Singh Ji did not respond to his question, but kept insisting that he did not ask anyone to call him Sant.

If people were writing "Sant" word on the posters without his permission, and if Bhai Ranjit Singh refuses to go to such deewans, right from that day, the Sant word will become "Bhai".

The entier talk show revolved around two issues, (1) "Dhaarna" and (2) use of the word "Sant" with his name. All the great sants in Sikh history used dhaarna to convey the meaning of a particular shabad, and then read the shabad.

These issues have to be resolved at Panthic level and should not become 'radio talk shows'.

apologize me if i offended anyone. i'm not saying what i said is right, but thats what i got out of the talk show... people may have different opinions. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fateh ji where can i find the

audio interview of prof.darshan singh withd sant ranjit singh?

128971[/snapback]

veer ji

waheguru ji ka khalsa

waheguru ji ki fateh

here is the link where u can listen audio interview of prof.darshan singh withd sant ranjit singh

http://www.ggsacademy.com/1984/rehras.html

also download his cd sikhi di pehchaan visit at www.sonapreet.net

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fateh ji where can i find the

audio interview of prof.darshan singh withd sant ranjit singh?

128971[/snapback]

veer ji

waheguru ji ka khalsa

waheguru ji ki fateh

here is the link where u can listen audio interview of prof.darshan singh withd sant ranjit singh

http://www.ggsacademy.com/1984/rehras.html

also download his cd sikhi di pehchaan visit at www.sonapreet.net

130690[/snapback]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 15 years later...
On 10/27/2005 at 11:08 PM, JSingh said:

First of all, this radio talk show should not have taken place. If both of these guys had something agaist each other they should have resolved it when Bhai Ranjit Singh visited canda. Its true that Ranjit Singh admitted what he did was wrong and did not know much at that time, but at the same time, if we take both of these guys' arguments, Prof. Darshan Singh had several valid points.

Prof. Darshan Singh asked Bhai Ranjit Singh not to go to any Deewan where there are posters that have "Sant Baba Ranjit Singh" on them and tell the organizers that he doesn't know who "Sant" Ranjit Singh is, I'm Bhai Ranjit Singh and therfore, I'm not coming to this deewan. Prof. asked Bhai Sahib to say these words several times in the talk show, but Bhai Ranjit Singh Ji did not respond to his question, but kept insisting that he did not ask anyone to call him Sant.

If people were writing "Sant" word on the posters without his permission, and if Bhai Ranjit Singh refuses to go to such deewans, right from that day, the Sant word will become "Bhai".

The entier talk show revolved around two issues, (1) "Dhaarna" and (2) use of the word "Sant" with his name. All the great sants in Sikh history used dhaarna to convey the meaning of a particular shabad, and then read the shabad.

These issues have to be resolved at Panthic level and should not become 'radio talk shows'.

apologize me if i offended anyone. i'm not saying what i said is right, but thats what i got out of the talk show... people may have different opinions. :)

Thats absolutely correct. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use