Jump to content

Ratanmala?


KH4L1$T4N1
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest A Singh.

Ratan Mala is a twenty-odd stanza Kachi Bani composition in Raag Ramkali that appears towards the end of Puratan Birs (very old copies of Guru Granth Sahib). As far as I know most the Panth has agreed this is not Gurbani and thus it does not have an inclusion in printed Saroops, but there are smaller sections of the Panth who still believe it is Gurbani.

Kavi Santokh Singh and Gyani Gyan Singh have written in their respective Granths that they believe it to be the word of Guru Nanak Dev Ji.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest A Singh.

In response to my Veer Pheena Ji, yes this is a different composition to Raag Mala. Rattan means Jewel or Gem so Rattan Mala is like a rosary or sequence of Jewels.

I don't understand why you would want to read Rattan Mala. There are hundreds of Angs of Gurbani to read, written by our Gurus. Least of all should a controversy on Rattan Mala's status as Bani be restarted as it has been on Raag Mala.

If you really wanted to read Rattan Mala then you can find it in many Puratan Birs at the end with other additional compositions. I think, also once it was printed in a Gutka by a certain group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In response to my Veer Pheena Ji, yes this is a different composition to Raag Mala. Rattan means Jewel or Gem so Rattan Mala is like a rosary or sequence of Jewels.

I don't understand why you would want to read Rattan Mala. There are hundreds of Angs of Gurbani to read, written by our Gurus. Least of all should a controversy on Rattan Mala's status as Bani be restarted as it has been on Raag Mala.

If you really wanted to read Rattan Mala then you can find it in many Puratan Birs at the end with other additional compositions. I think, also once it was printed in a Gutka by a certain group.

132430[/snapback]

What group was that?? Just out of interest, nothing more sinister. Do any "groups" still believe it to be bani?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest A Singh.

From the little I know, certain sections of Taksal and Nihang Jathebandia do still read Rattan Mala. I do not know how widespread the acceptance of this Bani is within the aforemented groups, and I do not think it is accepted in "mainstream" Taksal. Usually acceptance comes from camps ideologically contrasted to that of "mainstream" Singh Sabha ideas.

Perhaps some other wise Gursikh can correct me as I am unsure on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use