Jump to content

System Of Governance


singh_comradz
 Share

Recommended Posts

i think questions such as how such a state would be governed need to be clairified by us, the youth...

our ithias shows us that anything is possible....if tommorrow punjab became sovereign or even Delhi fell under Khalsa Raj..then what would our views be on governance?

would we have a monarchal system, presidency, premiership??

would it a totalitarian state with a single leader in charge

OR

a democratic state with a parliament

OR

a federation of states/ provinces like the US

OR

a centralised system with little autonomy to states/provinces

OR

panj piaarey (but how would they be appointed and what about the concerns of non-Sikhs?)

any ideas???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think questions such as how such a state would be governed need to be clairified by us, the youth...

our ithias shows us that anything is possible....if tommorrow punjab became sovereign or even Delhi fell under Khalsa Raj..then what would our views be on governance?

would we have a monarchal system, presidency, premiership??

would it a totalitarian state with a single leader in charge

OR

a democratic state with a parliament

OR

a federation of states/ provinces like the US

OR

a centralised system with little autonomy to states/provinces

OR

panj piaarey (but how would they be appointed and what about the concerns of non-Sikhs?)

any ideas???

145942[/snapback]

Khalsa Raj tahin hovega je kar assade Mukhi ral ke chalanghe...4 es. 2 day ago, in Italy's Gurudwara, Bhai Pyara Singh ji said that all Sant must be attahed, then at my home a man brought a film of Saint Ranjit Singh's Birthday, there were he has done...

I think in India, Drugs are main thigs of people, only Saint are doing the sofforzo....

RAJ CHAHIDA JIVE MAHARANA RANJIT SINGH JI DA...JEHRA BACCHEA DE RORHE VI KHA KAR UNA NU GOLD, FOOD ETC. DINDA SI; ...NANKANA SAHIB VICH DIVA NA VALDA DEKH KAR, GURUDWARA SAHIB JI DE NAM 72 MARABBE KARAYE...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a democratic state with a parliament

Id assume the panj pyare who know gurbani would probably be in favour of a democracry where everone has equal rights and a say in the country.

A monarchy would be bad.

I think the reason why khalsa raj fell because it was a kingdom, people like maharaja ranjit singh wher Not role model sikhs, he himself did alot of bad things. Under his kingdom sikhi was dying at the hands of hindu mahants. (correct me if im wrong)

A democratic state of khalistan is what we need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a democratic state with a parliament

Id assume the panj pyare who know gurbani would probably be in favour of a democracry where everone has equal rights and a say in the country.

A monarchy would be bad.

I think the reason why khalsa raj fell because it was a kingdom, people like maharaja ranjit singh wher Not role model sikhs, he himself did alot of bad things. Under his kingdom sikhi was dying at the hands of hindu mahants. (correct me if im wrong)

A democratic state of khalistan is what we need.

145949[/snapback]

your right in that it was a monarchy which is why it fell, the hereditory thing caused for the problem. they should have planned more for the future and been more precautious about any possible power struggles for succession, but oh well whats happened has happened.

i don't think Sikhi was dying under the raj. and the mahants showed their true colours under British raj.

but after decades of fighting mughal, afghan tyranny the Khalsa probably didn't take much heed of the brahmin threat which was let in through the back door i guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but oh well whats happened has happened

yep, it happend for a good reason too, if the singh sabha movement hadnt of tooken place, i think sikhi would be confined to history. But god has his ways for Re-awakining the panth, and its usualy in the fashion of disasters, ghalugharas and matyrdom. only then we return back to our guru and the veil of ignorance lifts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a sociologist i wud say history has taught us that monarchy is straight up disastrous, dictatorship is outdated so the two main options i fink wud b having panj pyare or having a communist society where all railwys, bus services, factories would be state owned to stop khalistan being to finacial and money based a communism would ensure equality

Link to comment
Share on other sites

State ownership would be the best idea because there would be no money greedy companies tricking Khalistanis into spending money and being taken advantage of!

State ownership would provide jobs for everyone and ensure that most of the populations have some type of income apart from the welfare sate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

State ownership would be the best idea because there would be no money greedy companies tricking Khalistanis into spending money and being taken advantage of!

State ownership would provide jobs for everyone and ensure that most of the populations have some type of income apart from the welfare sate.

146745[/snapback]

i know that we wud also hav religion on our side, but luk at russia and the eastern block countries .....capitalist hasnt really worked well

then what about the gov , we gna hav all these diff types of sikhs wanting to rule.

as much as i wud luv capitalist countries theyr ideal in theory

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use