Jump to content

Racists Can Kill You?


Guest PRITAM SINGH KHALSA
 Share

Recommended Posts

This has provided the perfect excuse for american Sikhs to use the right to bare arms shoot the next <admin-profanity filter activated> between the legs who tries it on with a Sikh.

And get locked up?

self-defence?

:TH:

:)

LOL.gif @ the number of one liner quotes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PRITAM SINGH KHALSA

Racists can kill you????????

I didnt put that no.gif

I put Retards can kill you

I think the guy who killed Mr. Singh deserves to die also. jamdoot.gif He cant claim to be retarded now wacko.gif

He was sane enough to kill grin.gif

notme.gifrolleyes.gif

This has provided the perfect excuse for american Sikhs to use the right to bare arms shoot the next <admin-profanity filter activated> between the legs who tries it on with a Sikh.

And get locked up?

self-defence?

:TH:

:)

LOL.gif @ the number of one liner quotes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Arizona Supreme Court overturned a man’s death sentence and instead gave him life in prison for the murder of a Sikh Indian immigrant just days after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

The court unanimously upheld Frank Silva Roque’s conviction in the shooting of Balbir Singh Sodhi, a Mesa gas station owner who prosecutors say was 'mistaken by Roque for an Arab'. Sodhi wore a turban and beard as part of his Sikh faith. The Sikh community had nothing to do with 9/11 yet have been the victims of prejudice, discrimination and hate crimes ever since the tragic events.

This is appalling to hear.

So this means they will send out retards to kill Sikhs and other minorities and its o.k.

They can trade a life of a righteous man for 5 years of a retards life??????

So this means for one retard to die then the retard can kill up to twenty Sikhs in order to get the death sentence for a hate crime? If you commit the crime you must pay not matter how dumb you want to pretend or even literally be.

Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth.

thats reealy bad, but shouldn't the concept of transferred malice apply, like the guy still INTENDED to do it to a muslim, so regardless of the religion of the person he actually did it to he should be punished...hmmm maybe americam law is different wacko.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use