Sikh Under Attack!

[amankaur]

some ppl's ideas im gona hafta disagree with, i say this b/c i can think of 2 examples off the top of my head that contradict ppls theories:

i have these two 'friends', they were both amrit shak and they got married..the girl started going from a dastaar to a ramal...which is kool...but then she would start wearing no ramal at times and now she wears no ramal at all...her husband i noticed slowly started changing too...he started cutting his beard..

on the other hand,another example:

i have these 'family frends' and the guy was amrit shak but the girl wasnt, however she was really into sikhi and did alot of paat, the guy was the one who started to do things that amrit shak ppl arent supposed to do BEFORE they got married, he thought he wud change himself so that he cud fit in with her ...BUT when the two got married, his wife made him realize his love for sikhi again and she encouraged him and told him to become baptized again , she woke up with him at amritvela so he wud start that again and now he is chardi kala like never b4..

Thinking about these two scenarios i've seen first hand, it shud remind us that ppl who arent amritshak can sometimes surpass those that are..no offense...but its the love someone has for sikhi and not what they show on the outside...if someone truly loves sikhi then they love a sikhs saroop...

Totally agree with what you just said above.

Fateh

[Singh With Dunalli]

some ppl's ideas im gona hafta disagree with, i say this b/c i can think of 2 examples off the top of my head that contradict ppls theories:

i have these two 'friends', they were both amrit shak and they got married..the girl started going from a dastaar to a ramal...which is kool...but then she would start wearing no ramal at times and now she wears no ramal at all...her husband i noticed slowly started changing too...he started cutting his beard..

on the other hand,another example:

i have these 'family frends' and the guy was amrit shak but the girl wasnt, however she was really into sikhi and did alot of paat, the guy was the one who started to do things that amrit shak ppl arent supposed to do BEFORE they got married, he thought he wud change himself so that he cud fit in with her ...BUT when the two got married, his wife made him realize his love for sikhi again and she encouraged him and told him to become baptized again , she woke up with him at amritvela so he wud start that again and now he is chardi kala like never b4..

Thinking about these two scenarios i've seen first hand, it shud remind us that ppl who arent amritshak can sometimes surpass those that are..no offense...but its the love someone has for sikhi and not what they show on the outside...if someone truly loves sikhi then they love a sikhs saroop...

This girl know how we do things. :wub: Anyways, to get the message on the right spot. You can't call yourself a sikh if all you do is PATH, neither can you call yourself a Sikh if all you do is keep the rehit. It's OUTER AND INNER.

Remember people: MIRI AND PIRI, BAKHTI AND SAKHTI, SANT AND SIPAHI, ETC.

Also, on the same line it's INNER AND OUTER....if you have the inner, the outer should come automatically. :TH: