Jump to content

Can One Person In A Relationship Be Amrithdhari And The Other Partner Not?


Guest Bass Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

here's what the punj said when i got amrit.

first they asked singles where their spouses were, most people said that they did not wish to take it yet. so the hukam was if you decide to go ahead with this then you can't have a physical relationship with your spouse until they take amrit as well.

bhul chuk maaf

guru rakha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest HaRdKaUrWaRrIoRz

i dont wana be labelled as a modern sikh, its just a question i had, im not saying im right or wrong, but im just sharing what i've seen and askin a question on that, some ppl jump to conclusions a bit too fast...im just trying to learn here :glare:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest s133k_s1kh

i dont wana be labelled as a modern sikh, its just a question i had, im not saying im right or wrong, but im just sharing what i've seen and askin a question on that, some ppl jump to conclusions a bit too fast...im just trying to learn here :glare:

FATEH!!!

No one is jumping to a conclusion. They are just discussing and giving a written form to their thoughts here. No one said this is the FINAL STATEMENT and we wont have further argument on this topic.

GURU RAKHA!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest HaRdKaUrWaRrIoRz

lol-dude i wasnt talking about anyone in particular, and u were the last person on my mind wen i was typin up my post, but was just sayin this in general and yeah this topic shud be closed...but gud to see ppls responses cuz i've seen alotta amritdharis wit nonamritdharis so i learned sumthing new today, i guess :D @

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest s133k_s1kh

lol-dude i wasnt talking about anyone in particular, and u were the last person on my mind wen i was typin up my post, but was just sayin this in general and yeah this topic shud be closed...but gud to see ppls responses cuz i've seen alotta amritdharis wit nonamritdharis so i learned sumthing new today, i guess :D @

FATEH!!!

Damn..I never said your comments were targeted towards specific individual. I replied to your post because you had said " People jump to conclusions a bit too fast." For me, i didnt see anyone jumping to a conclusion rolleyes.gif

Bhul Chuk Maaf Karni

GURU ANG SANG!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use