Jump to content

unity: stop bashing each other


SaRpAnCh
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Lets keep all our personal beleifs of samparda's and jatha's aside, We should all promote all panj takths amrit sanchar.

For example: For someone who asks where should i take amrit?

Answer should be regardless if one associates with samparda or jatha that amrit sanchars from panj takths are default pritham sanchars of Khalsa Panth.

I dont think anyone here disagrees with that, takth amrit sanchar maryada even if they may vary within each other, should be consider an "Pritham Amrit Sanchars of Khalsa Panth"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol

tats like questioning amrit man

this jatha's amrit, tat jathas amrit

now its takhats amrit

amrit is amrit

there's no two ways bout it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dancing Warrior

Change is afoot, the lies are being exposed. We have had enough of the fanatic, extremist, elitist Sikhi we have been force fed over the years. We seek the truth and demand it. This will cause divisions and conflict, this is the price for the truth. Fanatics your days are numbered. Freewill, equality, opportunity, diversity these are the Shastars these will seek your end. jamdoot.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1st things 1st .......theres shouldnt be any comprimise when it comes to rehit/amrit/bani etc but unfortunatley in this day and age ther is.........thers the right way or the highway

the obvious fact - One way is right and One way is wrong

........if u feel your way is right i think u shud have the right to fight it out and oppose the others as there should never be any comprimise when it comes to these sorts of things........because one day all the little things that change will lead to a big change.

people say keep ekta in the panth.....dont get me rong - which is a good thing.......but what sacrifces and comprimises are we willing to make.......

the next thing u know - one khalsa will belive something totally different to the next but yet will still be called a khalsa.....wheres the ekta in that???

bhul chuk maaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An elder GurSikh once expressed to me how the Khalsa Youth of today amaze him. The unity which he claims his generation can not achieve due to the corruption will be achieved the Khalsa youth who are still unpolluted in their thought.

But I have to disagree because from what I have seen the Khalsa Youth are just as judgemental over other GurSikhs based on their jatha, samparday, age, caste, region, style/colour of dastar, size of kirpan, type of keertan and tied/open dhara. These are a few debates I’ve witnessed in the last year or so. Every morning when we recite Anand Sahib, Guru Ji tells:

Ayhu vis sansaar tum daykh-day ayhu har kaa roop hai har roop nadree aa-i-aa.

This whole world which you see is the image of the Lord; only the image of the Lord is seen.

Question is do we really believe what Guru Ji tells us?

When we meet another Sikh, why are we analysing them straight away instead of analysing ourselves. Is it because we don’t see Guru Ji’s roop, instead we see an Afgani, a Kenyan, a Kharkoo, a Nanaksaria, a Jatt or whatever?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use