Jump to content

Gandhi


Guest guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest guest who started this topic

He called Sahib Sri Guru Gobind Singh Jee Maharaj a misguided patriot.

yaaa...i told my friend bout that

thas wha makes me not like him either

but she wanted to kno what was the other stuff about him that sikhs dont like! :lol:

FATEH !!

1. >> http://www.vho.org/tr/2004/2/Kemp184-186.html

2. >> http://www.trinicenter.com/oops/gandhi2.html

3. A person who didn't care about his moral duties, is called father of the nation . why ??..

why i said moral duties -- In his autobiography he has written that he didn't attend to his sick father ( even after one of his servants knocked at his door), because he was busy having sex with his wife. Pro Gandhi people say he had a courage to reveal this truth about him. i have no words for what he did no.gif THE FATHER OF THE NATION DIDN'T BOTHER TO HELP HIS DYING FATHER rolleyes.gif .

4. This is the latest book exposing the real Gandhi >> http://www.dukandar.com/gandhimask.html

5. His last words "HEY RAM"..the facts stated by gandhi's personal assistant ...read this >>>> http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=62211then

6. I hope SANGAT knows about Nathuram Godse, he's the man who killed Gandhi. >>>

http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/jul/22godse.htm

I just wasted my time talkin about the person i don't even care about :lol:

thanks for those sites :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

lol erm he did get married...and he was having sex when his dad died..i read that too wacko.gif neways apart from all the above he came up with Sikhs are genuine and watever buth then he dont acknowledge that we are of a completely seperate religion...we are a Hindu sect , there to protect other Hindu..load of rubbish neways- he's the reason why we still have no rights in India...it was him man what a sell out no.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold up i got a quote from a book i was reading:

'Mahatma Gandhi made a kind of pledge to the Sikhs at the time, which has resurfaced in the Khalistani community today. In an essay on communal unity he wrote,

"i ask you to accept my word...and the resolution of the Congress that it will not betray a single individual, much less a community...Our Sikh friends have no reason to fear that it would betray them, for, the moment it does so, the Congress would not only thereby seal its doom but that of the country too. Moreover the Sikhs are a brave people. They know how to safgaurd their rights by exercise of arms if it should ever come to that"

It should be noted that Gandhi also made many statements that Khalistanis today find anathema, such as that ll the Sikh Gurus were Hindus and that Sikhsism is part of the broader Hindu Tradition. While he believed that Indian Nationalism must override communal impulses, his incorrunt message that Hinduism was the ocean into which the rivers of all other faiths flow into alieneated the non-Hindu minorities. Khalistani Sikhs while drawing on Gandhis comment about the safegaurding of rights by exercise of arms, retain a deeply ambivalent attitude toward him.'

Cynthia Keppley Mahmood - 'Fighting for faith and nation' - a book on dialogues with Sikh "Militants"- which goes through the chain of events from almost the beginning of Sikhism to when the author wrote the book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's responsible for ripping the Sikhs homeland of Punjab in half and leaving some of our most sacred places in Pakistan and all together he is def not the MAIN reason for Indias freedom and India did got freedom through his peaceful methods, millions of people were butchered during the partition and the Sikhs got screwed by siding with India but i have no doubt they probably would have got screwed in Pakistan Punjab too, Punjab should have become an independant state we all know that punjabis whether they are Hindu, Muslim or Sikh are > the rest of India and the rst of pakistan combined

WJKK WJKF

OMG!!! ohmy.gif Ur the one who got Gudzo into the whole khalistan thing, shame you cant get him to keep his hair aswell, he dont listen to me, when he gets a bit of stubble he calls himself a gyanni!!!

WJKK WJKF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's responsible for ripping the Sikhs homeland of Punjab in half and leaving some of our most sacred places in Pakistan and all together he is def not the MAIN reason for Indias freedom and India did got freedom through his peaceful methods, millions of people were butchered during the partition and the Sikhs got screwed by siding with India but i have no doubt they probably would have got screwed in Pakistan Punjab too, Punjab should have become an independant state we all know that punjabis whether they are Hindu, Muslim or Sikh are > the rest of India and the rst of pakistan combined

WJKK WJKF

OMG!!! ohmy.gif Ur the one who got Gudzo into the whole khalistan thing, shame you cant get him to keep his hair aswell, he dont listen to me, when he gets a bit of stubble he calls himself a gyanni!!!

WJKK WJKF

In all my years of knowing 'Gudzo,' i dont ever recall of having a convo on Sikhism let alone Khalistan therefore i suggest you shut your trout instead of making absurd assumptions. :T:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gyani sant singh ji maskeen said that india did not get independance becuase of gandhi going on a fast.

we got independance coz of ppl like bhagat singh ppl hu gave up their lives, ppl hu were hanged to death. india would not have got independance if ppl didnt make armies (fauj)

he went on to say: the truth is that people who kept fasts and did nothing(gandhi) but talk became famous leaders!!! and ppl hu had been shot and dies for their country didnt get anything out of the sacrifices they made!!!!!!

^^ giani sant singh ji maskeen 'panth rattan'

makes my blood boil!! :lol: :lol:

hindus are blind, muslims are not

dhan guru nanak dev ji's first sikh: a muslim

person to lay first brick and start the construction of harmandar sahib.. u guessed it... A MUSLIM (mian mir)

After guru gobind singh ji is born who do we find out about first.. A muslim (shah) who was doind namas!

A muslim did the biggest kurbani for guru gobind singh ji .. pir budhu shah who lost his 4 children!

even till this day hindus are attacking sikhs...

anyway i cant go on forever

bhula chuka muaf karni

WJKK WJKF

WJKK WJKF

Oi u plonker!!! Yes I do talk lots but before I " shut my trout" I just have to say 1 thing: I KNOW WHERE YOU LIVE he he he

manchester uni ? :D

woops sori akhoza ... u have alredi sed it b4 on ss :TH:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use