Jump to content

Giving Out Parshaad


Guest -*-
 Share

Recommended Posts

I got a question in my mind but it might be controversial.

When giving out Parshaad to the "punj pyaraay" can you give it to biban? Recently at the gurdwara, a singh was giving Parshaad to a bibi and the sangat were like "ooooooo". I asked my friend if it was wrong but they didnt know. So is it right or wrong to give biban parshaad as being part of the punj pyaraay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gurufateh!

i dnt know about that - BUT people call me sexist or wuteva - but i dont think Bibi'an just DECIDE to take part as Panj Pyare - i mean Panj Pyare are Singh males - when the time came and the Panj Pyare were being made - women should have thought about it then that maybe they should have got up. Besides IN MY OPINION - Panj Pyare should remain as Singh males.

lol sorry i know u was just askin about the Parshaad but u know - Panj Pyare situation came in my mind

people dont get offended by what i said - its just my opnion chunga? :TH:

Gurufateh1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vahigurujikakhalsa vahigurujikifateh.

the parshaad should be given to five singhs. In the same way the panj piayre are five rehitvaan gursikhs. However if there are not enough singhs in the sangat for some reason, then its acceptable to give it to a bibi.

sorry for any mistakes.

vahigurujikakhalsa vahigurujikifateh

I got a question in my mind but it might be controversial.

When giving out Parshaad to the "punj pyaraay" can you give it to biban? Recently at the gurdwara, a singh was giving Parshaad to a bibi and the sangat were like "ooooooo". I asked my friend if it was wrong but they didnt know. So is it right or wrong to give biban parshaad as being part of the punj pyaraay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gurufateh!

i dnt know about that - BUT people call me sexist or wuteva - but i dont think Bibi'an just DECIDE to take part as Panj Pyare - i mean Panj Pyare are Singh males - when the time came and the Panj Pyare were being made - women should have thought about it then that maybe they should have got up. Besides IN MY OPINION - Panj Pyare should remain as Singh males.

lol sorry i know u was just askin about the Parshaad but u know - Panj Pyare situation came in my mind

people dont get offended by what i said - its just my opnion chunga? :TH:

Gurufateh1

i know that the user has just described his/her own opinion.

but i have thought about this a lots many times.

like why izit that the women of today's world should be bound according to what sth. shud/ or shud not have happened 3-4 centuries ago!!!!!?!?!??!?!??

i mean take the circumstances which were in india at those times when women weren't allowed to come alone out of their homes.........they had to cover their faces ----------GHUND KADNA...............and like they had nothing called a social status unless it was a princess or a queen.......i mean even a princess or queen was taken here and there in a covered palanquin...........

but everything's changed

the women of those times CANNOT be compared to the ones that are today.

women today are more open and self-dependent...........

i know of some situations where people say..."esp. 'girls' shud not get baptized b'coz they got to get married and go to an another home and what if the other family are not vegetarians or so......!!!!!"

but ofcourse it not as much anymore..........

so i think rules shud change here too.............

why shud women be bound acc. to what the women in 17th century cudn't do?!?!?!?

oh!!!! and please anyone....do not take it personally ......... i mean it has often been a topic of discussion for me .... so i mean i thought to put it forward. rolleyes.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gurufateh!

i dnt know about that - BUT people call me sexist or wuteva - but i dont think Bibi'an just DECIDE to take part as Panj Pyare - i mean Panj Pyare are Singh males - when the time came and the Panj Pyare were being made - women should have thought about it then that maybe they should have got up. Besides IN MY OPINION - Panj Pyare should remain as Singh males.

lol sorry i know u was just askin about the Parshaad but u know - Panj Pyare situation came in my mind

people dont get offended by what i said - its just my opnion chunga? :TH:

Gurufateh1

i know that the user has just described his/her own opinion.

but i have thought about this a lots many times.

like why izit that the women of today's world should be bound according to what sth. shud/ or shud not have happened 3-4 centuries ago!!!!!?!?!??!?!??

i mean take the circumstances which were in india at those times when women weren't allowed to come alone out of their homes.........they had to cover their faces ----------GHUND KADNA...............and like they had nothing called a social status unless it was a princess or a queen.......i mean even a princess or queen was taken here and there in a covered palanquin...........

but everything's changed

the women of those times CANNOT be compared to the ones that are today.

women today are more open and self-dependent...........

i know of some situations where people say..."esp. 'girls' shud not get baptized b'coz they got to get married and go to an another home and what if the other family are not vegetarians or so......!!!!!"

but ofcourse it not as much anymore..........

so i think rules shud change here too.............

why shud women be bound acc. to what the women in 17th century cudn't do?!?!?!?

oh!!!! and please anyone....do not take it personally ......... i mean it has often been a topic of discussion for me .... so i mean i thought to put it forward. rolleyes.gif

i totally agree with you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest baba amarjeet singh

the reason why singhniaa cannot do 5 pyare seva is simply because it was in the hukam of maharaaj for 5 singhs to do this seva.

this does not change, no matter how the time changes, maharaaj's hukam remains the same.

the physical roop of a gursikh who wishes to take part in panj pyare seva is required to be a gursikh singh, with no angs missing.

to change the roop of panj pyare that guru jee gave is not very wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Degh distributor!

agree with khalistan zindabadh, this is the correct maryada, wheres that link you gave before about how to make and give out degh?

5 singhs, or into the bata 5 times. nice and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest confused
the reason why singhniaa cannot do 5 pyare seva is simply because it was in the hukam of maharaaj for 5 singhs to do this seva.

this does not change, no matter how the time changes, maharaaj's hukam remains the same.

the physical roop of a gursikh who wishes to take part in panj pyare seva is required to be a gursikh singh, with no angs missing.

to change the roop of panj pyare that guru jee gave is not very wise.

where in bani does it say that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GurFateh

1. I'd like to see this 'hukam' that everyone's talking about that states that panj piare have to be malke.

2. I think that through this whole discussion, no one has mentioned what the 5 piare represent.

THE GURU. And the Guru is neither male, nor female; the Guru is the Guru.

If you use this logic that only men stood up in 1699 then you can go a lot further and say that only middle-aged males can be panj piare, or that only men by the name Himmat Singh, Mohkm Singh, etc, can be panj piare. Why are you trying so hard to replicate that day exactly? Guru's traditions are timeless.

Forget the fact that 5 MEN stood up in 1699. Remember that only 5 PEOPLE stood up in 1699, in a crowd of thousands.

It's things like this, barring sexes from truly participating in the legacy of Guru Gobind Singh, that show that we are failing as Sikhs today.

We are all children of Dasam Patshah. To allow one group of children to do seva rather than another group is an insult to our Father, because it shows that we REALLY don't understand what he has taught us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Definitely the Guru Sahibs would be a heavier Scriptures to handle. Dasam Granth is more towards Bir Rass, Guru Gobind Singh showed his Greatness (of course, they would never say this) by separating his own Baania.  And the BIGGEST test of all?? Do we try and read Dasam Granth, Understand n show respect like we do to SGGS? Or... Do we QUESTION it? Guru Gobind Singh Ji is testing us. 
    • My wife will be going for an MRI scan next week but her Kara won’t physically come off.  Is there any way the mri scan can be done with the Kara still on?  The alternative is we will have to try to saw it off before the scan.  
    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use