Jump to content

The Six K's? (uncyclopedia)


Carpe Diem
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yh it wz funi but on the other hand u think about it ppl who don't have dat much knowledge on sikhi can b mislead by this site.........well dats wat i fink grin.gif

People on not that much knowledge on anything would be mislead by this site

What's your point?

I agree with japmans lets not do a protest out of this :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a bit of fun really and the whole site is aimed at that. Even the six k's thing wasnt really offensive to the extent it would involve protests. I think this tests our sense of humour. if you begin to backlash against it, they will start to backlash against Sikhi.

I think anyone who goes on the site knows its written in a comic tone anyway. I guess the design could be a lot more different from Wikipedia to show its a seperate site. But if at the end of the day, dumb americans can read this kinda stuff in more their language, then they can see that sikhs are not extremist muslims...!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you guys

the POINT of that website is to NOT be factual, to make things AS EXTREME and AS RIDICULUOS as possible

if you put REAL information onthere, when people read it, they'll think the REAL stuff is a joke... really guys, you REALLY think there's people out there who go to a website called "UNCYCLOPEDIA" with the slogan "the content-fere encyclopedia"

people go there to laugh, knowing (or thinking anyways) that everything there is non-factual and unreal.......

it's almost a DISSERVICE ot put accurate and proper information on there....

so please...

chill

Many people do not know that this information has been distorted and will therefore believe what the article says. I dont no bout u, but i dont find it funny when SOMEONE MOCKS MY RELIGION!!! The peopl who wrote this are clearly having a dig at sikhi and ur askin us 2 chill...ok so u say that people know that the fact aren;t meant to be true.... i still think its disgraceful as we are not meant to be makin a joke out of sikhi! im sure if there was mockery of any other religions, people of that religion would not like it. THEY SHOULD NOT PUT ANYTHIN ON SIKHI AT ALL IF THEYRE GOING TO TOTALLY DISTORT IT 'FOR A LAUGH'! :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use