Chaupai Sahib

[V]

In respect to the Rehraas should be done according to the way the SGPC say is rubbish. they are diluting sikhi.

Bhaji we got to remember that the MARYADA is MARYADA,

IU mean i eahrd from someone that TYHAT was how it USED TO BE DONE,

and then later on People began to add more and more BANI, which in my opinion is WRONG!

cause if GURU JI made it like that, then its MEANT TO BE LIKE THAT

if you want to read more Bani, that GOOD ..very well done.

but I think people shoudl stop claiming it to be in the REHRAAS

ALso As foir the long CHaupie

I have NO CLUE why it is like that,

but I remember a katha vachic from SIkh Missionary collage, said that Chaupie is to 25 and thats IT

as Ms 514 siad iina previous post:

You want to read extra Gurbani in your Nitnem...great...do it. You a women who wants to wear a Keski? Fantastic.

But what gives any of you the right to tell the rest of the Panth they are wrong? If you feel that strongly, raise the point with the Akal Thakat. But until changes are made to the Rehat Maryada, it IS the law of the Panth and it is the duty of every Sikh to follow that law.

Bhull chukk maaf

Wah

eguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

[navjotsingh]

I was talking to a bazurag from taksal and i asked him if it is sagri or sigri, he told me it can be either since they have the same meaning, just like how sometimes in bani if you ad a tipi its still the same meaning.

[V]

I was talking to a bazurag from taksal and i asked him if it is sagri or sigri, he told me it can be either since they have the same meaning, just like how sometimes in bani if you ad a tipi its still the same meaning.

But i've heard that you shold pronounce it SHUD.

There was someone who posted a Sakhio where someone was doing PAath..'wrong'

And Guru ji told ihm to stop breaking his ANG

there was someone who posted that before:s

bhull chukk maaf

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

[navjotsingh]

thats different, If you have a mukta word insted of a unkar you change the whole meaning of the word like in rehrass where it says tam sansar charan lag tareea , so people say tum sansar which is insulting guru. So changes like that. But if the word means the same thing it different.

[Guest mehtab]

ok thanks a lot on "sagri"

now in the 23rd pauri i m still not sure if its "mo" or "meh" (taa ke taap tanak mo har ho or taa ke taap tanak meh har ho)

thanks

[Gupt_Singh]

ive just got a regular gutka....doesnt look taksali or sgpc or whatever......i dont think it has the longer rehras or chaupai but it definately has the anand.......anywhere online i can find the roman transliteration of the words (plllllzzzzzzzzzz) or the place in SGGS where i need to do extra paath from

i do see this as quite important cuz i remember a sakhi of a gursikh who didnt do his jap sahib and as a result he got semi darshan from guru gobind singh - guru ji only looked at him then rode away........n he found it was cuz he hadnt dun his nitnem properly

also when is tavprasad chaupai ment to be read? or r u meant to read kabiyo baach benti chaupai in the morning n evening (thats wat i thought)

[Mkhalsa]

I have a question thats been bothering me..

What is sampooran chaupai? in the taksal gutka there seems to be TWO different versions..

one (in rehras) starts with another chaupai and has more arrils and dohras at the end and the other is in the nitnem which just has a little bit more but a LOT less than in rehras. Which one is right? the one in the rehras has page references from all over dasam granth which would suggest its NOT one bani but a bunch of them put together from different parts of dasam granth, whereas the nitnem one seems to be one continuous bani. so which is right? and if the nitnem one is then why purport that the rehras one with bani added from all over the place is the correct one?

I am pretty confused.

[Jkaur]

yupz same here.. im confused myself too.. ive got a taksali gutkha and da same question which virji mkhalsa has pointed out was playin in my mind..