Jump to content

Rakhri


Recommended Posts

i agree...there's no reason to call rakhi anti-sikh, although it is up to u if u want to do it. I agree that sikhs are meant to be brothers anyday, just as they are meant to be good sons. So we have mother's day, and in this case rakhi, that some people use to """emphasize""" that duty. Nothing wrong with emphasization of the same principle that is present in sikhism...but it still is your choice...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Narinder Singh

With a Sikh woman has a Sri Sahib by her side and the power of Akal backing her up, a stupid thread thats called a "rakhri" becomes a joke.

And all this "singhs are meant to protect their sisters" jargon belongs on a hindu forum, dont bring that garbage mat on this forum.

Fateh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

skepticsikh i agree with you if the rakhri was in fact a secular concept but you seemed to have decided to skip the ancient idea of rakhi in the post by Mehtab Singh written by a Harpreet Singh.

in it it states the concpet as a religious one. you seemed to have jumped thousands of years to a Mughal story.

That's my issue with your post.

nothing else.

A stupid string isn't a threat to me personally nor is it to sikhi. just want to get the facts straight, that's all.

who are we to believe, the story about the origins of rakhi by harpreet singh or your version?

one talks about the roots of this festival to ancient hindu times and your talking about the mughal period.

you get me?

peace bro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well i agree....i read something like that on wikipedia too. But the fact is that since hinduism is so old and without an authoritative structure, you can bend almost every feature of 'indian culture' into 'hindu culture' if you so choose. Hinduism is very adaptable in that sense and has historically been able to be tolerant and take into itself the beliefs and philosophies of others. Like buddha....there are quite a few hindus who believe him to be another one of vishnu's avatars. And also, even if rakhi's origins are seen in hinduism, they are seen in hindu legends; i didn't want to trace the origin to mythology but to history, and history that i had heard myself.

I thought rakhi was secular in the contemporary sense, because of course there are many different people from many different religions who do it. And that's basically it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use