Jump to content

Zail "singh"


KhalsaMan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't need research to form an opinion on this man.

If he was an honest sikh, he would've resigned his post as President ASAP. Going by your notion that he was "in the dark", he should've resigned on the day they attacked as he surely wouldn't have been in the dark then.

As far as i'm concerned, he is an enemy of the Khalsa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

zail sio was indira's chamcha who was president at the time. i believe according to indian "law" the army is called upon by the president so it was zail sio who signed the go-ahead for the army to attack his religion's people and sovereign authority sri akal takhat sahib ji.

1984 was planned and carried out by sellout sikhs...that's the sickening part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its like mann kaum layee mentioned. Plenty of people from Sikh background sold out and were involved in the planning and execution of the attack. Singling out one is just dumb a*s*s.

In the period after 1984 till the early 90s. Plenty of turban wearing policemen were involved in the murder and abduction and rape of fellow Sikhs. I remember one ragi who was visiting from India telling me "Don't believe what you hear about Hindus doing this and that. I was there, it was our own Sikhs doing the most of the killings." Bahmans may be behind the plans but the execution of these was conducted by fellow Punjabi Sikhs (I use teh term SIkhs loosely here!).

That is a sad fact overlooked and not faced by your average person and just shows you how easy it is to buy many SIkhs off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But think about Shaheeds.

It is extremely difficult to give up your family life for sikhi.

They are great, so remember there sacrifice.

Sikh looking people are easily bought for money, but without bani they were never sikh. Dogras were never sikh, do they.

It is irony that many weak person have too come in sikh, there appearence is like sikh but idelogy of Brahmins.

there is saying

Je sikh, sikh nu na maare| tan eh kaum kade na haree||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zaila was a traitor, Indira's pet dog, responsible for the "go-ahead" of Operation Bluestar in June 1984.

He was one of MANY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use