Jump to content

Is This True?


Recommended Posts

You have to accept this fact that guru gobind singh wrote chandi chariter chandi is devi not god, he also write chandi d waar, not god d waar, he also write brahm awtaar, rudra awtaar, vishnu awtaar these are not god's, he use to uchjaar chandi d waar before fighting a war. Deh Shiva Bar Moh Ehe..........It means Hey Shiva give me blessings, Shubh Karman Tae kabhoo na taron.............So this is part of dasam granth where most of composintions belongs to guru gobind singh and mostly for these dieties.

If you want to say guru gobind neither pray of hindu gods remember you are simply declining the authorship of guru gobind singh from dasam granth.

I got into an argument wheter DEH SHIVA BAR MOHE means O ALMIGHTY BLESS ME or O SHIVA BLESS ME???

I said guru ji mean O ALMIGHTY...

But this guy replied this which is in the quotation... Is he right or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is propaganda (proper gainda...gainda = hippopautamus) by those Ashutosh boot lickers. Throughout Sahib Sri Guru Granth Sahib Jee we have Raam, Gopal, Gobind, Maadho, Murari and scores of names of Akaal Purakh which these guys interpret as Gurujee glorifying avtars, whereas they infact bring out only a particular attribute/quality of Akaal Purakh (we can't comprehend ALL His qualities/attributes). These are called sifaati naam, as they do sift (glorify) of Waheguru. I always thought its Siva and not Shiva, but someone correct me on that one. Siva refers to Akaal Purakh, not the deity Shiv Ji. Why Gurujee wrote Chandi di Vaar, from my limited knowledge, is because it describes a war which Chandi fought with demons. Why would Gurujee write the title as one thing and the details totally different to the title? Tell your friend that Gurujee also said in Dasam Granth "Mai na Ganeshe pritham manaun, Kishan Bishan kab hu neh dhiyaun".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As shiva or Shiv means akal purakh, and Hari means Akal Purakh, Takhur means Akal Purakh etc within the Guru Granth Sahib jee, in this shabad by Guru Gobind Singh jee, Shiva refers to Akal Purakh and not the Hindu Diety. In this shabad there is no veechar of the Hindu god.

Shiv in Gurbani can mean parmatama for example: Jugat Shiv Raihta (1407) to remain fixed in Akal purakh.

Where a story is given regarding Shiva, then in gurbani it can be referring to the Hindu God Shiva: (Shiv kai baan shir katioo)

Shiv in the Guru Granth Sahib can mean Shakti, Bhai Vir Singh jee in his Guru Granth Sahib Kosh gives Shatki as one of the meanings for Shiva. Akal Purakh represents Shatki, its the attribute of Akal Purakh. Shiv can also mean knowledge, however in the Shabad Deh Shiva bar mohe hai, I think it means shakti (akal purakh). Look at Bhai Vir Singh jees kosh for more on the word and where it comes from.

When looking at the dasam granth jee, we can find the answers of what Shiva means in this shabad:

ਨਮੋ ਕਾਰਿਤਕਯਾਨੀ ਸਿਵਾ ਸੀਤਲਾਯੰ ॥੧੦॥੨੨੯॥

Thou art the power of Kartikeya and Shiva etc.! I salute thee.10.229. (Chandi Chitra

Only Akal Purakh is saluted by Guru Gobind Singh jee. People try and be clever by picking out certain lines without reading the whole composition of manipulating it. Write at the start of the Composition, Guru jee always made it clear for us in the dasam granth what his thoughts were for example:

Pritam bhagauri Simar kai Guru nanak .... Pauri 1 Chandi di //

Khanda Pritmai saj kai jin sabh saisar upaya (pauri 2) chandi di //

Both these pauri are only in praise of Akal Purakh and the Gurus.

If we read the dasam granth compositions front to back rather than back to front, people would not get into such confusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gurufateh ji

just read the other banis and it becomes clear

in sawiya saib guru gobind singh ji states surely that the only one he recognizes is the true one lord and that it

in guru granth sahib too guru ji talks about ram and shiva and thakur

guru ji also mentions the muslim name for God allah many times

still guru ji is reffering to the one lord alone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use