Jump to content

Tribute to Father Of Civil Liberties In India


Simran9
 Share

Recommended Posts

justice_v_m_tarkunde_040324.jpg

TRIBUTE

Father Of Civil Liberties In India

Till the very end, despite his failing health, which had confined him virtually to his house for the last year or so, he worked and wrote tirelessly for the causes that he held dear, particularly the cause of Civil Liberties.

With the passing away of Mr Tarkunde, India has lost the father of the Civil Liberties movement in the country. He died on March 21 after a brief illness at the ripe age of 94. Till the very end, despite his failing health, which had confined him virtually to his house for the last year or so, he worked and wrote tirelessly for the causes that he held dear, particularly the cause of Civil Liberties.

I first met Mr Tarkunde in 1976 during the Emergency, when Civil Liberties had been extinguished and the Habeas Corpus case was being heard by the Supreme Court, which would decide whether one could even approach the courts against illegal detention by the State, during the Emergency.

At a time when even four out of five judges of the Supreme Court succumbed and got intimidated into holding that fundamental rights and Civil Liberties got eclipsed during an Emergency, Mr Tarkunde with the blessings of JP founded the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL). From then on, till he died, he worked with exemplary courage, dedication and personal integrity, for the cause of Civil Liberties and human rights in the country, even when it was hazardous and not fashionable.

The assault on Civil Liberties and human rights did not end with

the end of the Emergency. The assaults were relentless and resurfaced in different forms, in different parts of the country -- in Kashmir, Punjab, the Northeast and indeed most other parts of the country -- with various draconian laws like TADA, POTA, the Armed Forces Special Powers Act etc.

And, he fought relentlessly against every form of human rights abuse, not hesitating to say what he believed in, even if that offended some of his friends. He was one of the first outsiders to speak on behalf of the Kashmiri people, saying that they had the right of plebiscite.

When the anti-Sikh riots shook the country after Mrs Gandhi's assassination, he led a team of lawyers to the very heart of places where the carnage was taking place, in an attempt to stop the carnage. He refused to be cowed down even when he was threatened with arrest and his book exposing the human rights abuses in Punjab had been banned.

What distressed him most however was the rise of communal fascism in India with the growth of the RSS/BJP and allied organisations of the Sangh Parivar. He could clearly see what was coming with the demolition of the Babri Masjid. He told me at that very time that the BJP and the Sangh Parivar represented forces of fascism which would not tolerate Civil Liberties in this country.

He asked me to read Escape from Freedom by Erich Fromm which dealt with the psychological roots of fascism, in order to understand the psychology of members of the Sangh. He was particularly disappointed with some of his erstwhile friends and colleagues from the Civil Liberties movement who had become the prominent intellectuals, rationalisers, and influential members of the government led by the Sangh Parivar.

It was difficult for him to get over the fact that he had once made Arun Shourie, a general secretary of the PUCL! Given his prescience and understanding of the methods and psychology of the Parivar, I'm sure that h

e foresaw the Gujarat carnage well before it took place. With the increasing stranglehold on power of the BJP and its allied organisations, the manner in which communalism was being spread with State support, and the manner in which POTA had been used, he was deeply worried about the future of Civil Liberties and democracy in this country, at the time of his death.

As a founder member of the Committee on Judicial Accountability, he actively worked for the cause of judicial accountability till the end. He had also founded the Centre for Public Interest Litigation, to take up public interest litigation in a systematic manner with proper research. Since I was looking after the Centre for several years, I recently wrote to him informing him of the recent activities of the Centre and seeking a small donation for the Centre. He promptly sent a cheque of Rs. 20,000, and said that though he had not been able to attend the meetings of the Centre because of his health recently, he was very happy with its activities.

I had decided to go and meet him immediately after I received this letter. Unfortunately however, I kept putting off the meeting, not knowing that he was particularly unwell and in fact in the hospital, which I learnt about only when he passed away.

I will never be able to forgive myself for this procrastination. I hope that someday all the people in this country will realise the enormous debt that they owe to this one man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use