Jump to content

Youtube Search: Sikh

Guest Sikh Munda

By Guest Sikh Munda,
in GUPT FORUM

 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Malfion

Guest Malfion

Posted
Posted
Sikh Qoum Declared Khalistan in 1986 anyone who goes against that is not a Sikh as not wanting Khalistan means they want to remain in India under brahmin rule which Guru Khalsa Panth can never do,the Panth has decalred Khalistan in 1986.A true Sikh would not want his nation to be under the shackles of slavery and would want Khalsa Raaj anyone who goes against that is not a Sikh

I'm not from India, but judging from what I've read, the idea of Khalistan(the more modern depiction of it) doesn't really seem feasible at this time (the world is in a bad state right now, and it would complicate things), and It doesn't really matter to me because its just a physical piece of land, having many people move could be taken advantage of by terrorists,etc, and who would we blame then? I'd say we should think about it some more, because no one really knows what Khalistan should be(I've heard everything from a seperate country to a new state in India).

The Indian government is now a democracy, we have more leverage in politics, and Brahmins can't really do much nowadays.

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SaRpAnCh Grand Master

SaRpAnCh

Posted
Posted
Sikh Qoum Declared Khalistan in 1986 anyone who goes against that is not a Sikh as not wanting Khalistan means they want to remain in India under brahmin rule which Guru Khalsa Panth can never do,the Panth has decalred Khalistan in 1986.A true Sikh would not want his nation to be under the shackles of slavery and would want Khalsa Raaj anyone who goes against that is not a Sikh

I'm not from India, but judging from what I've read, the idea of Khalistan(the more modern depiction of it) doesn't really seem feasible at this time (the world is in a bad state right now, and it would complicate things), and It doesn't really matter to me because its just a physical piece of land, having many people move could be taken advantage of by terrorists,etc, and who would we blame then? I'd say we should think about it some more, because no one really knows what Khalistan should be(I've heard everything from a seperate country to a new state in India).

The Indian government is now a democracy, we have more leverage in politics, and Brahmins can't really do much nowadays.

Oh is that what its called a democracy ? Or do you mean hypocracy ?,If you think the brahmins can't do nothing you really do not know who is incharge in India or who is pulling the strings.

A piece of land you say ? Oh just land well that piece of land will ensure the security and protection of the Sikh Faith,just like Muslims have mecca and jews have jerusalem .The Sikh Homeland through Khalistan will be FREE and protected from interference ,stuff what time the world is in its kalyug so of course its going to be bad.Khalistan will be a seperate sovreign nation as declared in the Sarbat Khalsa 1986 ,

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest _satsrikal_

Guest _satsrikal_

Posted
Posted
Sikh Qoum Declared Khalistan in 1986 anyone who goes against that is not a Sikh as not wanting Khalistan means they want to remain in India under brahmin rule which Guru Khalsa Panth can never do,the Panth has decalred Khalistan in 1986.A true Sikh would not want his nation to be under the shackles of slavery and would want Khalsa Raaj anyone who goes against that is not a Sikh

I'm not from India, but judging from what I've read, the idea of Khalistan(the more modern depiction of it) doesn't really seem feasible at this time (the world is in a bad state right now, and it would complicate things), and It doesn't really matter to me because its just a physical piece of land, having many people move could be taken advantage of by terrorists,etc, and who would we blame then? I'd say we should think about it some more, because no one really knows what Khalistan should be(I've heard everything from a seperate country to a new state in India).

The Indian government is now a democracy, we have more leverage in politics, and Brahmins can't really do much nowadays.

Oh is that what its called a democracy ? Or do you mean hypocracy ?,If you think the brahmins can't do nothing you really do not know who is incharge in India or who is pulling the strings.

A piece of land you say ? Oh just land well that piece of land will ensure the security and protection of the Sikh Faith,just like Muslims have mecca and jews have jerusalem .The Sikh Homeland through Khalistan will be FREE and protected from interference ,stuff what time the world is in its kalyug so of course its going to be bad.Khalistan will be a seperate sovreign nation as declared in the Sarbat Khalsa 1986 ,

How is it going to happen? Only with overwhelming support it will. In order to have the right to self determination you need overwhelming support of a group of people. 86' was a different time than now. What about Nankana Sahib in Pakistan? Look at Kashmir... I don't want that in our Punjab. I want peace.

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
fresh singh Explorer

fresh singh

Posted
Posted
Sikh Qoum Declared Khalistan in 1986 anyone who goes against that is not a Sikh as not wanting Khalistan means they want to remain in India under brahmin rule which Guru Khalsa Panth can never do,the Panth has decalred Khalistan in 1986.A true Sikh would not want his nation to be under the shackles of slavery and would want Khalsa Raaj anyone who goes against that is not a Sikh

Khalistan is not Khalsa Raaj. Khalistan = punjab , Khalsa Raaj = all the world

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BhForce
      Concept of Sin

      By BhForce · Posted

      I agree we're not born with sin like the Christians think. Also I agree we have effects of karma. But Gurbani does state that the body contains both sin and charity (goodness): ਕਾਇਆ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਪਾਪੁ ਪੁੰਨੁ ਦੁਇ ਭਾਈ ॥ Within the body are the two brothers sin and virtue. p126 Actually, we do need to be saved. Gurbani calls this "udhaar" (uplift). Without Satguru, souls are liable to spiritual death: ਜਿਨਾ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨ ਭੇਟਿਓ ਸੇ ਭਾਗਹੀਣ ਵਸਿ ਕਾਲ ॥ p40 Those who have not met Satguru Purakh are unfortunate and liable to death. So, yeah, we do need to be saved, and Guru ji does the saving. The reason Satguru is the one to save is because God has given Satguru the "key" (kunji): ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਥਿ ਕੁੰਜੀ ਹੋਰਤੁ ਦਰੁ ਖੁਲੈ ਨਾਹੀ ਗੁਰੁ ਪੂਰੈ ਭਾਗਿ ਮਿਲਾਵਣਿਆ ॥੭॥ In the True Guru's hand is the key. None else can open the door. By perfect good fortune the Guru is met. p124
    • BhForce
      Fake Baba

      By BhForce · Posted

      That's unfortunate to hear. Could you give any more information? Who was this "baba"? He just disappeared with people's money? Obviously, you should donate your money to known institutions or poor people that you can verify the need of through friends and family in Punjab.
    • Singh1989
      Fake Baba

      By Singh1989 · Posted

      Sangat ji,  I know a family who went Sevewal to do seva sometimes end of 2019. They returned last year in great dismay and heart broken.  To repent for their mistakes they approached panj pyaare. The Panj gave them their punishment / order to how t make it up which, with Kirpa, they fulfilled.  They were listening to a fake Baba who, in the end, took all the "Donations " and fled sometime over a year ago. For nearly 4 years this family (who are great Gursikhs once u get to know them) wasted time and effort for this fake Baba. NOT ONLY this one fam. But many, many did worldwide and they took their fam to do seva, in village Sevewal, city Jaitho in Punjab. In the end many families lost money in thousands being behind this Baba. The family, on return, had to get in touch with all the participants and told them to stop.  I am stating this here to create awareness and we need to learn from whom we follow and believe. It's no easy but if we follow the 3 S (Sangat, Simran and Seva) we will be shown the light. As I am writing this the family in question have been doing the same since 2008 onwards and they fell for this Baba... it is unbelievable and shocking.  This am writing in a nutshell as am at work on my break so not lengthy but it deserves a great length.  Especially the family in question, who shed light on youngsters about Sikhi 20 plus years!! 
    • BhForce
      Any Easy to understand punjabi katha

      By BhForce · Posted

      Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi Kalan uses simple Punjabi.
    • BhForce
      Is suraj parkash right? is it a reliable source of info?

      By BhForce · Posted

      Leaving aside Guru ji, the general question of taking afeem (opium) in limited quantities for war/medical wounds is simply unproblematic. When you go to the hospital, they give you morphine. What do you think morphine is? It's an opiate. Even codeine (cough syrup) is an opiate! Ever had a cough? Granted, it is against Gurmat to take opium or other drugs for the fun of it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use

  I accept