Jump to content

Darshan Ragi Gets Sanmaan In Ny


Recommended Posts

All politics aside can someone please clarify what Darshan's views exactly are? Or direct me to a link? Thanks in adv.

From some i hear that he isn't against Dasam Granth and from some I hear he is, what's the truth?

Darshan Laal is completely against Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji. He doesn't even believe the three Banis read at Amrit Sanchaar from Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji are Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji's Banis.

http://patshahi10.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=310:darshan-singh-ragi-performs-at-rochester&catid=49:keertan&Itemid=66

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All politics aside can someone please clarify what Darshan's views exactly are? Or direct me to a link? Thanks in adv.

From some i hear that he isn't against Dasam Granth and from some I hear he is, what's the truth?

This was the hottest issue in sikh circles for almost a year. I am surprised that you are so ignorant about it.

Do some search and you will know as archives are full of his blasphemy.

Hew is discarding banis of nitnem and amrit sanchar and you can imagine how he can be a sikh even.

Lastly to call a spade a spade is not politics. We do not discuss politics here.

Disgusting!

In one of the related videos from this function someone asked him which of the compositions from Sri Dasam Granth are Gurbani. He replied that none of the compositions from Sri Dasam Granth are Gurbani. According to him they are 'panth parvanat rachnavaan'.

This shameless creature and a Kala Afghana stooge now doesnt even consider Jaap Sahib, Chaupai Sahib as Gurbani. Guru Nindak. He is so much drenched in ego that he doesnt even know what might be in store for him.

Shame on people like Tehal Singh who invited him to say this trash.

He is selling kala afghana cookies in a sugar coated way.Kala afghhana rejects Amrit sanchar.

Darshan lal says the same thing but in an indirect way. Obviously he is trained like a parrot by

agencies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All politics aside can someone please clarify what Darshan's views exactly are? Or direct me to a link? Thanks in adv.

From some i hear that he isn't against Dasam Granth and from some I hear he is, what's the truth?

This was the hottest issue in sikh circles for almost a year. I am surprised that you are so ignorant about it.

Do some search and you will know as archives are full of his blasphemy.

Hew is discarding banis of nitnem and amrit sanchar and you can imagine how he can be a sikh even.

Lastly to call a spade a spade is not politics. We do not discuss politics here.

Alright, so it's been out for a year? Then what, that doesn't mean i've not looked into the subject, what's wrong with that? I'm not really ignorant as I've also read up on it but there are always different things I hear. Some people say at first he completely discredited Dasam Granth some say later on he changed his views saying you can't do viakha on Dasam Granth and some people say something totally different.

I've seen a bit of his interview and he talks about how you cannot label the Dasam Granth as a Guru, something true, but I never have seen him directly say Dasam Granth isn't the bani of Guru Gobind Singh Ji or discarding Banis...

The reason for this question was so someone could lay what his views are clearly cut, why you may ask? It's so others can see exactly what his 'philosophy' or views are in hope to educate themselves as to why they aren't true. This will lead to the education of others who might fall victim to misinformation.

This is something people are lacking right now, willingness to cooperate diplomatically and inform each other. Instead a person is slandered and demonized and in effect the follower of the slandered figure's support could rise...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that he does not have a consistent view on the subject proves that he does not know anything on the subject and is

doing anti sikh propaganda.

That is what one can expect from a 10 grade ragi who writes himself a professor. This fake professor can only do kirtan form a handwritten

parchi in front of him.He does not have any intellect to understand bani of tenth master which is so deep and full of metaphors and symbolism.

It is our Gurus who have given us message to follow. It is ignorance to expect any philosophy from darshan ragi.Sikhb philosophy does not conform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that he does not have a consistent view on the subject proves that he does not know anything on the subject and is

doing anti sikh propaganda.

That is what one can expect from a 10 grade ragi who writes himself a professor. This fake professor can only do kirtan form a handwritten

parchi in front of him.He does not have any intellect to understand bani of tenth master which is so deep and full of metaphors and symbolism.

This and what prevented him from going to the Akaal Takht and even talking with people who don't agree with him is a clear example of ego.

edit- Just a person isn't educated in a system created by man, it doesn't mean he can't be wise. These personal attacks kind of discredit what you're saying.

Also I put quotes around philosophy ('philosophy')/ wink.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Academic knowledge and spiritual knowledge are two separate realms.

He has neither. he does not ahve education and he is a sharabi and kababi . A sharabi and kababi does not attain spiritual heights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that he does not have a consistent view on the subject proves that he does not know anything on the subject and is

doing anti sikh propaganda.

That is what one can expect from a 10 grade ragi who writes himself a professor. This fake professor can only do kirtan form a handwritten

parchi in front of him.He does not have any intellect to understand bani of tenth master which is so deep and full of metaphors and symbolism.

This and what prevented him from going to the Akaal Takht and even talking with people who don't agree with him is a clear example of ego.

edit- Just a person isn't educated in a system created by man, it doesn't mean he can't be wise. These personal attacks kind of discredit what you're saying.

Also I put quotes around philosophy ('philosophy')/ wink.gif

Singh 559, did you not get the link I pasted on to this thread. Everything you say about slandering others is just a game to be played where the facts are put to you, but you ignore to look at them.

To what I have picked up on, is that your not here to get informed, but here to spread your propaganda. I hope you can prove me wrong on this last bit, so click on that link and watch the information unfold before your eyes or keep taking the route you are on and watch how foolishness is broken down. The ball is in your court, do as you please.

Just incase you missed the link and it was an honest mistake, here it is again

http://patshahi10.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=310:darshan-singh-ragi-performs-at-rochester&catid=49:keertan&Itemid=66

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use