Jump to content

Khalistan - Some Misconceptions


Pyara
 Share

Recommended Posts

Awesome kavishri

A word of advise for those that shake. Sing the Bani of Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji Maharaj.

I'll dowload it and watch it. Maybe it will inspire me and fill me with the fire that is needed. I still say we should not trivialise and simplify shahaadat, and have this romanticised, idealised perception of martyrdom. It's not as easy as people assume it to be.

That's all I've got to say about this subject for the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big words. Give your head and I'll follow.

To want to see another one of our brothers dead - even in the glory of shaheedi - is one dead Sikh too much. If we keep fighting until the death, there'll be none of us left to live in the "promised land". We have more tools at our disposal than what our ancestors had. Whilst there is no greater glory than death, surely it's time for a new approach. An approach that involves life instead of death. I'm sick of being surrounded by the foul stench of death.

Those that bang the drum for self-sacrifice and shaheediya, give your real name on this website and go give your shaheedi. What are you waiting for? Then we'll know you were serious and your words were not hollow.

I wrote a whole paragraph and you attack me on one line interesting. We had a peaceful protest against Nirankari's and we ended up with 13 Shaheedi's on Vasakhi 1978. We wanted Anandpur Resolution (Equal Rights for Sikhs) and we end up with Operation Bluestar so tell me exactly how is peaceful ways working out for you? Lets forget about 1970's and 1980's and come to 2009 we had Ludhiana Riots in which sikhs went to protest peacefully and guess what more sikhs died. What tools do you have at your disposal? We are not going to have many sikhs left for the "promise land" if they are dying from drug's or commiting suicide. If you have a better approach then what i wrote then please come up with it instead of attacking me on here and i am willing to listen you instead of attacking you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now You would need copies of Hari Singh Nalwa , Akali Phoola Singh and Ranjit Singh to strike fear in the hearts of pathans / Muslims if you would like Sikhs to still dominate inspite of being outnumbered by Sullas and Bamans

We don't need them and majority of muslims and hindus want peace and don't know whats going on in today's punjab and will throw there support behind us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No-one is attacking you. I regret if it seemed that way. I would not do that. My frustration was more to do with the discussion rather than any one person.

I have no solution. We've all discusssed this subject to death. It's actually becoming a frustration for me. I feel sympathy for those that have to live the horrors of the past, every single day of their lives. I just think we need to stop and think before we begin encouraging each other to die glorious deaths whilst we sit behind our computers in anonymity, knowing full well that the chance of us seeing "action" is slim to zero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reveal to the world what your name is, pick up your sword or your AK-47 and then go kill who you need to kill in order to make this a reality. I'll follow you until the end.

No? Then it's all empty words and false bravado.

What exactly do you want sikhs to do so we can live in peace and continue to promote sikhi please tell us your views?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No-one is attacking you. I regret if it seemed that way. I would not do that. My frustration was more to do with the discussion rather than any one person.

I have no solution. We've all discusssed this subject to death. It's actually becoming a frustration for me. I feel sympathy for those that have to live the horrors of the past, every single day of their lives. I just think we need to stop and think before we begin encouraging each other to die glorious deaths whilst we sit behind our computers in anonymity.

Well it seems like i am being attacked by you and you offer no solution of your own. We have lived horrors in the past and we are still living them today which people seem to forget and also it is rarely reported on news sites. According to savepanjab.org a sikh farmer is commiting suicide every 1/2 hour and the water we see in punjab is going to be finished in 15 years. We got Sikhs that are high on drugs and killing themselves and majority have cut there hair or are have hair and are busy getting drunk. We are only going to get somewhere when 25 million sikhs say they want equal rights and want a free and independent Punjab or Khalistan and are willing to fight for it and i will also fight for it. India itself only came into existence because people fought for it and it was actually promoted through newspapers with ideas of how they wanted India to be from indians that lived in canada or usa at the time. We are sitting on computer discussing or arguing how we want Khalistan or Punjab to be so we can agree or disagree and educate people on the idea of independent Khalistan or Punjab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually its not a stupid idea since that is what Maharaja Ranjit Singh's Punjab was based upon and muslims were the majority and sikhs were the minority and were able to practice there religion in freedom without being killed. If you ask any muslim from punjab or sikh or even hindu they will say that was the best period in time for Punjab

I've known loads of Pak Panjabis. They don't feel like you've indicated above. You are being unrealistic. If anything, they are generally proud of getting their own nation. Quite a few of them see the Sikh raj as a period of shame - when kuffrs managed to get the better of Islam and dominate Muslims.

Plus given how a lot of them treat Sikh girls in the diaspora, good knows what they'd get up towards our community as a majority.

As another poster commented, it was only the threat of violent retaliation from Singhs that kept them in line in the past. In today's context, there would probably be loads of Muslims that would attack a kuffr run Panjab with suicide attacks, terrorism etc. to achieve their freedom. Who needs that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've known loads of Pak Panjabis. They don't feel like you've indicated above. You are being unrealistic. If anything, they are generally proud of getting their own nation. Quite a few of them see the Sikh raj as a period of shame - when kuffrs managed to get the better of Islam and dominate Muslims.

Plus given how a lot of them treat Sikh girls in the diaspora, good knows what they'd get up towards our community as a majority.

As another poster commented, it was only the threat of violent retaliation from Singhs that kept them in line in the past. In today's context, there would probably be loads of Muslims that would attack a kuffr run Panjab with suicide attacks, terrorism etc. to achieve their freedom. Who needs that?

I have a muslim friend who actually thinks Maharaja Ranjit Singh's rule was great for muslims. I don't think currently going by the news most muslims are happy with Pakistan they have there own issues they are dealing with. I am sure not all Hindu's are happy with India since India does not cater to every Hindu's needs. Most in both countries are sitting in poverty.

We never threatended muslims with violent realiation i know they looked up to the singhs but we gave them high paying jobs and freedom and that is the reason they helped us keep the Mughals and also the British from invading us. We actually gave them there independece and good jobs that is the reason they stuck with Khalsa Raj otherwise they could have easily turned against us had the Mughals tried to invade us or the British when Maharaja Ranjit Singh was alive.

In the previous Khalsa Raj they could have done easily suicide attacks then against us but did not. In the end it all comes down to for people two things money and freedom if they have that then majority of the people of that country don't do anything to disrupt it.

You actually made some good points in the post and probably the only person that actually told me why its a bad idea for Punjab with explanations.

What do you think we should do to fix our current issues? Do you believe in Khalistan or India?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't need them and majority of muslims and hindus want peace and don't know whats going on in today's punjab and will throw there support behind us.

Is that why many of these hindu asserted that their mother tongue was Hindi and not punjabi when it came to division of land on the basis of Language Spoken in the erstwhile years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use