Jump to content

< Burning Issues >


Recommended Posts

Vahiguru ji ka khalsa, Vahiguru ji ki fateh!

Sadh Sangat Jio,

The 'Where were the nihungs in 1984?' thread (http://forums.waheguroo.com/index.ppa?act=ST&f=14&t=1018) has just been closed.

In one sense this is positive because the debate had indeed developed away from the initial issue which was regarding the presence/absence of 'nihungs' during the dark days of 1984. Sadly, not much worthwhile and insightful discussion was generated although it did give a glimpse into a very controversial issue...and the lack of adequate responses.

However, i think it is quite sad that a major opportunity was missed on this forum - that is a chance for the 'uk nihungs' (as they are often referred to) to explain, in a loving and respectful environment, some of their views to their fellow Veer and Bhain jis. This is especially since they have attracted much attention, in many cases for the wrong reasons, on Sikhi internet forums worldwide. To their credit they insist that they are open to questioning, discussion, clarification etc.

The key issues which were gradually raised, although off-topic, can be referred to in the following specific manner:

> 'Nihungs' + Bhang

> 'Nihungs' + Chatka

> 'Nihungs' + 'Three Scriptures’ as Siree Guru Sahib Ji

i humbly propose that Admin/Mods decide where these THREE NEW AND SEPERATE THREADS could be started and located so as to get the most relevant and focused discussions generated.

These themes should also have stickies in the sense that, for instance, the 'Nihungs' + Chatka thread should not be based around the question: 'Sikhs should/s

houldn't eat meat' but rather be a factual and intelligent discussion around 'the concept of Chatka and wider Sikh thought'. Likewise, The 'Nihungs' and 'Three Scriptures' as Siree Guru Sahib ji thread would not deal with 'authenticity of Dasam Granth' but rather 'when, how and who it was installed by, for what purposes and whether this was appropriate'. This would ensure that we do not undermine Siree Akaal Takht Sahib but as Sikhs ensure that Sikhiya is promoted...especially when drastically conflicting Parchaar is being thrust in front of 'inexperienced young Sikhs'.

Although this is not a moderated forum (for better or for worse) i urge the Admin/Mods to keep an eye on these discussions and to keep the threads on-track.

i do not mind doing 'brief digests' as the first posts within these three threads by collating the relevant posts from the 'Where were the Nihungs in 1984?' thread and clarifying the sub-issues which were raised; many of which remained unanswered. This should act as a kickstart and let the three new threads develop from the point at which they reached previously within the recently closed thread.

Any thoughts?

Thank you in advance.

Vahiguru ji ka khalsa, Vahiguru ji ki fateh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

veer iot's a good idea for the most part.. but it won't fly for the following reason...

from my experiences on Sikhawareness (Whichi s where many of the uk nihangs post), these are their feelings about sikhsangat:

1. every member is AKJ (little do they know :wub:)

2. Every member is fanatically khalistani

3. Every member is a fanatic

4. Many of them, if not all, hate or are taught to hate the ideology that AKJ preaches... and thus, their thinking this is an "AKJ" site doesn't encourage them to even want to cmoe here..

5. even if this site is not only akj, they feel that their ideology is always knocked simply beacuse it does not match the consensus on this site. (this i somewhat agree with on their part however... they may have a point regarding this)

i'm not against giving it a shot, but don't be shocked if all the threads become exactly what you didn't want them to be... very soon, each thread will either become a big arguement, or... just a bunch of nothingness... but if admin's on board, then i guses, give it a shot...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vahiguru ji ka khalsa, Vahiguru ji ki fateh!

Dear Veer/Bhain 'japmans' ji,

Some very constructive thoughts there.

So, will Admin/Mods be able to 'moderate' these new threads or does the current infrastructure not allow them to moderate (i.e. proactively monitor) posts?

Vahiguru ji ka khalsa, Vahiguru ji ki fateh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use