Jump to content

Guns/ Shastars at home


atl singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

How about.. How many of you have Sikh books like of bhai veer singh?? how many of you have guru sahib jee at home?? without proper sikhi knowledge all stuff are of no use :lol:

Its one of Gurujee's hukams to keep shastars. Thats the reason Sant Jarnail Singh Jee Khalsa Bhindranwale asked Sikhs to keep weapons. If the Sikhs of Delhi had listened to him, there would have been a lot less Sikhs killed in November 1984 in Delhi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about.. How many of you have Sikh books like of bhai veer singh?? how many of you have guru sahib jee at home?? without proper sikhi knowledge all stuff are of no use :lol:

Its one of Gurujee's hukams to keep shastars. Thats the reason Sant Jarnail Singh Jee Khalsa Bhindranwale asked Sikhs to keep weapons. If the Sikhs of Delhi had listened to him, there would have been a lot less Sikhs killed in November 1984 in Delhi.

hanjee.. but Sikh first need to be able to keep shaastar.. Not every common sikh person can keep shaastar and can use it when the time comes. Bhinderanwale and other kharkoos weren't like today's common lazy sikhs, they were nitnemi, amritvela and naam simran wallay singhs. So talking about keeping shaastars while 99% majority of sikhs (including me) don't follow proper sikhi doesn't make sense.

If one is keeping shaastar as a hobby then that's different

thing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about.. How many of you have Sikh books like of bhai veer singh?? how many of you have guru sahib jee at home?? without proper sikhi knowledge all stuff are of no use :lol:

Its one of Gurujee's hukams to keep shastars. Thats the reason Sant Jarnail Singh Jee Khalsa Bhindranwale asked Sikhs to keep weapons. If the Sikhs of Delhi had listened to him, there would have been a lot less Sikhs killed in November 1984 in Delhi.

hanjee.. but Sikh first need to be able to keep shaastar.. Not every common sikh person can keep shaastar and can use it when the time comes. Bhinderanwale and other kharkoos weren't like today's common lazy sikhs, they were nitnemi, amr

itvela and naam simran wallay singhs. So talking about keeping shaastars while 99% majority of sikhs (including me) don't follow proper sikhi doesn't make sense.

If one is keeping shaastar as a hobby then that's different thing...

SIngh if thats the case then these Common sikhs Should take they Kirpans off as a Kirpan is a Shastar, also take your Kara off as well because thats also a Shastar.

We have to be a warrior as well as a Sant. A kirpan is to remind us that we need to keep Shastars with us and know how to use them.

We should have at least 5 Shastars with us all the time, the kirpan during the years as got small, we should try to keep a big kirpans with us all the time.

I bet you if you walk down the street with a few Shastars no one will touch you.

Guru jee loves Shastars, and we are scared to keeps a few guns and blands as we may break a nail.

I am happy to see all these young singhs learning to use modern Shastars, if we were like the singhs from the past we should have a few kirpans on us, and few AK47.

So keep more Shastars on you, and learn to use them. Don't listen to all these Westen Sikhs that tell you not to keep them. As you have to read bani all the time or that you may break a nail or some thing.

When Training to use these Shastar just think of Waheguru jee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whoopsy-daisy

i should have used the word 'weapon' not 'shastar' earlier in referring to my mum's chuppul

pardon my language

still... it does not take away from it's power-

i'm sure most of us feel they would rather face any weapon on earth than a slap from one's mother because you know you done something PROPER bad to get it

fortunately i'm a good little mummy's boy so i'm ok

:lol: ))))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use