Kesri Lehar Early Day Motion 296 House of Commons UK

[JagtarSinghKhalsa]

Why was the Minister allowed to speak (respond) 38 minutes into the debate and not hear the views and proposals of MPs before responding?

This is a departure from normal practice. Why did this happen?

Did India have something to with this or did MPs from all sides collude?

Just called Sikh Channel and mentioned this point and and point above.

This should not be 'brushed under the carpet'

Watch Quami Malse tomorrow 7-8pm

[JagtarSinghKhalsa]

Why was the Minister allowed to speak (respond) 38 minutes into the debate and not hear the views and proposals of MPs before responding?

This is a departure from normal practice. Why did this happen?

Did India have something to with this or did MPs from all sides collude?

Just called Sikh Channel and mentioned this point and and point above.

This should not be 'brushed under the carpet'

Watch Quami Malse tomorrow 7-8pm

Also called Kesri Lehar programme and raised same two questions - Paramjit Singh Sohal became very defensive - Kesri Lehar was not being criticised - the politicians were!

They took break and then Paranjit Singh Sohal attacked Dabinderjit Singh and Sikh Federation (UK) by name.

This then encouraged others to call and make negative comments.

No doubt Sangat TV will take some action.

[JagtarSinghKhalsa]

Why was the Minister allowed to speak (respond) 38 minutes into the debate and not hear the views and proposals of MPs before responding?

This is a departure from normal practice. Why did this happen?

Did India have something to with this or did MPs from all sides collude?

Just called Sikh Channel and mentioned this point and and point above.

This should not be 'brushed under the carpet'

Watch Quami Malse tomorrow 7-8pm

In the debate the Minister ‘responded’ 39 minutes into the two and a half hour debate and did not hear the views and proposals of all MPs before he responded.

This is a departure from normal practice.

The Minister spoke at the end of the debate that followed on Thursday on the Kurdish Genocide 25 years ago.

Why did this not happen in the Abolition of the Death Penalty in India debate?

Did the Indian government have something to do with this and did MPs on all sides collude to allow the Minister to get away with taking this approach?

It looks as though keeping India happy is more important than responding to concerns expressed by constituents via their MPs and getting the UK Government to respon to proposals and questions.