2002 Gujarat Genocide Of Muslims Designed By Narendra Modi : Indian Corrupt Judiciary Clears Narendra Modi Of All Genocide Crime Charges

[JasSinghKhalsa]

Indian Judiciary shows its true colours again today when it exonerates the designer and leader of 2002 Gujarat Genocide of Muslims lead by the then Chief Minister of Gujarat Mr. Narendra Modi, Mr. Narendra Modi enjoys a special status in the Hindu majority country where people love Genocide of minorities, so any leader who commits genocide of minorites enjoys a long term state rule and even promotion to the nation rule. The Corrupt and blind Hindu Judiciary always helds all such Hindu communal culprits freed, whilst even any innocent Muslim/Sikh/Dalit/Chritian is behind bars without any charges for entire life.

SHAME ON BLIND AND CORRUPT HINDU JUDICIARY, U WERE BETTER OFF WHEN U WERE SLAVES, U DESERVED SLAVERY, U BETTER BE SLAVED AGAIN SOON AND FOREVER.

http://www.ndtv.com/article/cheat-sheet/no-ethnic-cleansing-or-genocide-2002-judgement-463548?pfrom=home-topstories

No ethnic cleansing or genocide: 2002 judgement

Ahmedabad: A Gujarat court today ruled that Narendra Modi will not face charges in the 2002 riots in the state, rejecting a petition by Zakia Jafri, whose husband Ehsan Jafri was burnt alive by a mob.

HERE ARE THE HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 440-PAGE ORDER:

1. Not enough material on record to support allegations against the accused persons that can satisfy this court.

2. Charges are levelled in a systematic manner against all accused from different angles and record too presented to prima facie establish it as offence, but after sound study of the records, court has concluded that there is no prima facie evidence against the accused persons.

3. Train burning incident is not pre-planned conspiracy by government's office bearers, cannot be concluded that it was abetted by them.

4. The events cannot be described by foreign terminology - ethnic cleansing and genocide.

5. Request for Army sent in time.

6. Modi addressed both the communities on Doordarshan and appealed for peace. It shows that police and security forces were deployed to control the law and order situation in the state. In such circumstances, accused's act cannot be interpreted as conspiracy or abetment.

7. Court does not agree that Modi did not take positive steps to control riots. In its closure report, SIT has elaborately dealt with this aspect and court agrees with it.

8. Zakia Jafri has described horrible incidents in her complaint, but this court can take them as her perception and it can evaluate them by the yardstick of law. To initiate criminal proceedings against somebody, court has to take into consideration the material on record, and Sanjiv Bhatt and R B Sreekumar's revelations do not prima facie appear trustworthy.

9. The details revealed by Sanjiv Bhatt do not get any substantiation from anywhere and hence his claim that he was present in the meeting and allegations against Modi do not prima facie appear substantial.

10. This court believes that the state government undertook necessary process and took efforts to control law and order as per the requirement of the situation. This court cannot decide on whether they were enough on basis of their moral and principle duty... It is quite natural that all people cannot be satisfied with the efforts of people who were in power. It is also natural that they express their displeasure towards it. This court agrees with SIT that Modi took enough efforts in short time after Godhra carnage to see that law and order situation does not deteriorate further and situation remained peaceful.

[Mehtab Singh]

Great timing, just before he is all set to become the supposed/alleged PM. The 1984 culprits may be let off using similar techniques.

[Hindustani]

There is a video of him on the day of the rioting asking for peace. Modi on the day of the rioting itself called Digvijay Singh and asks for police and army to quell the rioting and gets a big no. Here is a video of Modi telling Digvijay Singh right to his face.

[JasSinghKhalsa]

I am unable to see any proof/data that this Video is of the day of rioting. I am quite surprised why you are defending him?

[acsap]

Yes, the same way they like to defend Sikh killers. Nobody could match hindus/India the way they have killed minorities. It is a shame, however, there are still some good Hindus out there, but very few. Hindu India is million time worse than Taliban.

[Hindustani]

Not that the minorities are any better.

[Hindustani]

I am unable to see any proof/data that this Video is of the day of rioting. I am quite surprised why you are defending him?

Modi asking for peace and calm on the day of the riot is a separate video which I will post.

This video is of modi grilling digvijay singh. Modi on the day of the rioting called the central government and state governments run by the congress party and personally spoke with mr. digvijay singh asking for police and army to quell the rioting. Mr. Digvijay singh tells him a big no. Modi brings this up near the end and of course digvijay singh has no answer.

Yes, the same way they like to defend Sikh killers. Nobody could match hindus/India the way they have killed minorities. It is a shame, however, there are still some good Hindus out there, but very few. Hindu India is million time worse than Taliban.

Maybe then you should live with the taliban instead of running into india asking for asylum.

[Hindustani]

[JasSinghKhalsa]

Amandeep, if this Video was telecasted on Doordarshan, the Doordarshan Logo would had been on top right hand corner, which proves this is a fake video shooted and posted a lot later.

[acsap]

"Maybe then you should live with the taliban instead of running into india asking for asylum."

I don't need asylum from some 4th worlh country called India. I am just posting to your incoherent racist drivel. Why are you making a perssonal attack on me. Although I don't expect anything from Indian apologist. However, I will not come to your 2cent level to make a perssonal attack.