I hear what you are saying.
It seems that Delhi Sikh men are soft and Delhi Sikh women don't value them.
So much do they not value Delhi Sikh men that they prefer hindu men.
There is a whole load of inter-sexual dynamics at play.
This is my take (this is just my opinion)
I think 1984 has had an impact in the eyes of Delhi Sikh women that they cannot see Delhi Sikh men in the same way.
Delhi Sikh men could not protect them and they see Delhi Sikh men as weak.
Women can show great disloyalty and will side with who they think is stronger.
That is what I think. I may not be completely correct but I reckon there is probably some truth in what I am saying.
Recent (I'm talking the past 10 years or so) reassessment of Islamic encroachment into India, particularly from Western sources, has shifted to, "The Mughals did some great things for India and its people, too."
It's like walking up to a Jew, and saying, "Stop crying about the Holocaust. The Nazis created Fanta, Volkswagen, and the Autobahn. Be a little grateful for their contributions!" Can you see history being gradually shifted to this point of view regarding Nazi Germany? No, me neither.
thats the most ridiculous of lot.
Just because i feel betrayed by hindus or RSS , I should go to lap of muslim or pak. they're worse !
I as a sikh in india am a free person pretty much. My family is safe and sound, no hindu forced their religion on me. Our communities are safe, pakistan is exactly opposite of all this