Jump to content

coward hindustani indian enuch hijra army using sikh slave soldiers against china border row


superkaur
 Share

Recommended Posts

In recent weeks the sikh identity has been misused by Chinese state media to hit back at India's use of Sikh soldiers on its borders by mocking the sikh identity. Then indian state media propaganda machine creates a big hoo haa crying racism when india establishment has caused the sikh genocide not pakistan not china. India govt deliberately uses our Sikh brothers against their enemies on the border danger zones for a reason. To deflect all the attention from themselves and onto the wage slave soldiers who have no choice into the matter where they are deployed within india or aboard.

Sikhs are caught in the middle of hindu india's mess usually. When Hindu fanatics attacked babri masjid the muslims lumped hindus and sikhs together and attacked our places of worship across the world. And when Sikh soldiers are deployed in kashmir or in wars against pakistan the Sikhs are praised but when they want to fight for their own religious interests for their own free independent state they are labeled as terrorists and anti-nationals.

Sikhs should boycott all non-sikh armed forces or refuse to be deployed in area's where there is a higher chance of conflict out of protest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why pulling innocent eunuchs and hijras into it ? what have they done to you or sikhs to be name called for hate ?

Where are the "Awwal allah noor upaya, kudrat ke sab bande" parroters ?

Lets stop making more fun of ourselves by saying one thing and doing another . People observe us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, superkaur said:

In recent weeks the sikh identity has been misused by Chinese state media to hit back at India's use of Sikh soldiers on its borders by mocking the sikh identity. Then indian state media propaganda machine creates a big hoo haa crying racism when india establishment has caused the sikh genocide not pakistan not china. India govt deliberately uses our Sikh brothers against their enemies on the border danger zones for a reason. To deflect all the attention from themselves and onto the wage slave soldiers who have no choice into the matter where they are deployed within india or aboard.

Sikhs are caught in the middle of hindu india's mess usually. When Hindu fanatics attacked babri masjid the muslims lumped hindus and sikhs together and attacked our places of worship across the world. And when Sikh soldiers are deployed in kashmir or in wars against pakistan the Sikhs are praised but when they want to fight for their own religious interests for their own free independent state they are labeled as terrorists and anti-nationals.

Sikhs should boycott all non-sikh armed forces or refuse to be deployed in area's where there is a higher chance of conflict out of protest.

Lol

What have enuch and hijra community got to do with the war. lol

As ajeet punjabi said if they want to enjoy themselves by taking it up the exit holes then let ajeet and other gay people do it and enjoy themselves. 

Obviously I dont agree with it but each to their own. Im not going to say lets beat them up.

Ajeet do you attend gay pride events to show your support fo the homosexual community?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

Why pulling innocent eunuchs and hijras into it ? what have they done to you or sikhs to be name called for hate ?

Where are the "Awwal allah noor upaya, kudrat ke sab bande" parroters ?

Lets stop making more fun of ourselves by saying one thing and doing another . People observe us.

Not hating on hijra enuchs lol im just saying thats what hindustanis are they rather dance around enjoy themselves while letting others fight for them like circus clowns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly how will you impose a boycott on Indian Army? And if you join the army, you should sort of expect some sort of risky deployment. If you don't want that, don't join then! Protesting is just silly. 

 

They join on their own anyways. Plus if a boycott is implemented, that's tens of thousands of Sikhs without employment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
2 hours ago, superkaur said:

Not hating on hijra enuchs lol im just saying thats what hindustanis are they rather dance around enjoy themselves while letting others fight for them like circus clowns.

These "Sikhs" consider themselves Indian, and that's who they are protecting. These people have their own interests into it, and that is a love for their country. Sikhs have to fight for Khalistan willingly, not simply asking Hindus to see what Sikhs do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

Then dont join the army. Simples

Economics means thats their only viable means of earning a good wage so its not that simples as you put it.

The non-sikh paymasters in Delhi know this thats why they use the Sikhs of punjab who are brave but not as intelligent as their cowardly sly skinny but rich brahmin counterparts usually the Guji hindu types.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

These "Sikhs" consider themselves Indian, and that's who they are protecting. These people have their own interests into it, and that is a love for their country. Sikhs have to fight for Khalistan willingly, not simply asking Hindus to see what Sikhs do.

Most Sikhs are Indians. 

We have seen the consequences of fighting for our homeland in 84 nd it was bloody. India today is much stronger than in 84. Any sikh rebellion would be crushed in an instant. It would be foolish to repeat the same again 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
7 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

Most Sikhs are Indians. 

We have seen the consequences of fighting for our homeland in 84 nd it was bloody. India today is much stronger than in 84. Any sikh rebellion would be crushed in an instant. It would be foolish to repeat the same again 

Every nation has had to fight empires stronger than them for independence; however, they've had to find like-minded allies to benefit them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use