KHALISTAN

[Guest SikhForLife]

veerji they will support anyone with money and political power!

[Sarbloh Soulja]

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

yeh, tru

[Punjab Da Sher]

True, the wealthy businessmen might support Khalistan, if there are any financial benefits, but influencing the politicians is another story...Especially politicians in the West, who for the most part, view the Khalistan movement as a violent one due to some unfortunate incidences in the past....But you're defenitely right on one note, we need to hold a significant amount of the World's capital flows, and economy to get noticed, something that the Jews are pretty good at....

[japmans]

i was having a conversation with my dad today about it.. i'm neither pro nor con...

different issues arise:

1) water... where would we get our water from? we would have no access to the Indian Ocean and all the 5 rivers of Punjab are so badly polluted, that can't even be an option. water treatment plants would be sooooooooooooooooo expensive to deal with that kind of polluted water.

2) Electrical Infrastructure... we'd almost have to start from scratch for electrical power.

3) geography... we'd have enemies on each and every side of us, especially if khalistan is created by violent means. Sure, we're Khalsa, and we're warriors and everything.. but step back for a second and look at this logically.. Where would we get the cash to build and sustain a powerful army to go up against the likes of Pakistan who more often than not would be enemies, and India, which would be more often than not, also be enemies.

4) Production... Not everything required can be produced in our Khalistan. As fruitful as Punjab is, there isn't the potential to produce everything. This means importation and exportation.. and you know what that means.. going the cheapest route... our neighbours, pakistan and india.

5) what to do with the 45% of hindus in the province?? kick them out? hence, steal their land, their assets, essentially.. similar to what happened in 1947... this means the same thing happens to sikhs all over india whom are not in punjab. it'd be a civil war. and what if you DO keep them in Khalistan? then what would you have achieved? it'd remain status quo, the only thing being you'd have severed any friendship that minutely exi

sts with India right now.

6) capital city .... chandigarh? status quo.. jallandhur.. biggest city.. trashy atmosphere.. drugs drunking.. AMRITSAR! wouldn't that be beautiful? our capital city in Amritsar!?! Logically, it could never happen. It's right on the border of Pakistan and India.. wayyyyy too dangerous..

I'm sorry if i sound negative about it, but these are serious things we have to look at. It appears to me that ever since 1947, it's been an issue of pride. It's been a fight of the 5-year olds. our stance is

"They (muslims) got it! we want it toooo!!!"

India's stance:

"We don't like you. We're not giving you what you want"

and really, these are only the simple questions. water.. base of life.. how willl that work? electricity.. these things are necessities, not small extra options and luxuries... especially for a state like punjab that relies on agrticulture and farming to bolster it's economy

your views and answers would be greatly apprecieated.!!

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

[Guest SikhForLife]

money solves all problems

[nanosecond]

5) what to do with the 45% of hindus in the province?? kick them out? hence, steal their land, their assets, essentially.. similar to what happened in 1947... this means the same thing happens to sikhs all over india whom are not in punjab. it'd be a civil war. and what if you DO keep them in Khalistan? then what would you have achieved? it'd remain status quo, the only thing being you'd have severed any friendship that minutely exists with India right now.

we will not do what ind govt did. Why kick hindus out of khalistan? khalistan won't be pure Sikh State. It would be a secular country unlike Ind.

All Hindus and people who belong to other communities would be reassured whether they want to live in Khalistan or go to India in a peaceful way.

All minorities would be treated at par with the majority in Khalistan.

By keeping other communities in Khalistan we would show how in a muticultural country , human rights could be respected.

Remember khalistan would not be India It would be a diverse secular country

[Guest mehtab]

Why was my message deleted in this thread ?

[Guest mehtab]

i guess my post was too true to believe...its all good...but juz remember that juz coz u didnt know bout some stuff doesnt mean it never happened

regards

[GABROO KHALISTAN DAH]

rochak veer i remember ur post, why would hindus staned up against sikhs in khalistan when they're being treated as they should???

rather i dont' even think they would have the ballz 2 do it. But sikhs have a point, a reason, a mathlab, juss like the kashmiris we are a seperate culture a religion without a government to represent us we want distinction and self rule.

[japmans]

we will not do what ind govt did. Why kick hindus out of khalistan? khalistan won't be pure Sikh State. It would be a secular country unlike Ind.

All Hindus and people who belong to other communities would be reassured whether they want to live in Khalistan or go to India in a peaceful way.

All minorities would be treated at par with the majority in Khalistan.

By keeping other communities in Khalistan we would show how in a muticultural country , human rights could be respected.

Remember khalistan would not be India It would be a diverse secular country

veerji/bhanji....

we're dealing with a VERY VERY VERY large minority here....a minority that continues on growing... and that 45% does not even include the Sikhs who have been targetted and hit by the RSS... so if Sikhs in fact have a majority...we're looking at a 52-48 split or something like that.... it's not nearly as easy as giving them an ultimatum.....not to mention all the power hungry Sikhs and power hungry Hindus that reside there