Who is Ragunath in gurbani

[Pallav2015]

Hi I want to know who’s ragunath in gurbani Hindu claim this word appear for ram chandra

if we read guru teg bahadur maharaj salok maharaj clearly rejecting ram gayo ravan geo

but at the last pangti

Kahu naanak īh bipaṭi mai
tek ēyk ragɦunaaṭɦ ॥55॥

Says Nanak, in this calamity, the Lord alone is my support

who is this ragunaath

why would maharaj use ragunath as refrence for god?

[MokhamSingh]

Everything in Gurbani points us towards the Atma. Atma and Parmatma are the same…

Atama and Parmatma is the source that creates and causes everything…

What have the following items got in common?

A fan.

A television.

A fridge.

A radio.

A computer..?

These things are powered by electricity. Without electricity these things are lifeless. It’s the electricity that causes these things to function…

Atma is the source of energy that allows everything to happen. 
 

without Atma, we are lifeless…

Call this Atama RAGUNATH…call this Atma by any other name…the fact remains that it’s the life force energy…

Dieties also have the same Atma as humans, but they still part of the creation, and not the creator…

 

[Pallav2015]

Sir my question is why has occurred the need for modern vyakhakaars say this mean this ,

why our guru patshah used used those word 

which are now being explained why did guru create confusion ?

[MokhamSingh]

Names of the creator that are used in Gurbani, were in existence before any Avtars etc…

Raghu…means the the place where the Atma resides, where breathing takes place…

Nath means…the master, the creator, etc…

[Pallav2015]

How people use to meditate before satguru Nanak dev ji came to this world ??

[MokhamSingh]

On 12/17/2023 at 5:10 PM, Pallav2015 said:

How people use to meditate before satguru Nanak dev ji came to this world ??

Before Guru Nanak…people engaged in Hatt Yog…

But Guru Nanak preached Bhagti Yog…which is more feasible in this era. Also, Bhagti Yog is for everyone…no caste discrimination etc…

[Pallav2015]

On 12/25/2023 at 10:43 PM, MokhamSingh said:

Before Guru Nanak…people engaged in Hatt Yog…

But Guru Nanak preached Bhagti Yog…which is more feasible in this era. Also, Bhagti Yog is for everyone…no caste discrimination etc…

Thank you for clearing my doubt 

On Ang 

695

 

Ḍaaḍɦeele laᴺkaa gaɍu ūpaaɍeele raavañ bañu
sali bisali ạañi ṭokɦeele haree ॥

In this pangti what does hari word mean whom bhagat trilochan ji saying 

is hari here used for ram Chandra ??

I thought bhagat were nirgun upshak 

[MokhamSingh]

If my name was Hari, Waheguru, Ram, Damodar etc…Is Gurbani praising me..?

Is Gurbani praising the Jyot that is the cause of everything..?

The Jyot Akal Purakh has no specific name…the Jyot empowers life and actions to take place…

SGGS only praises the Jyot…not individuals…

[MokhamSingh]

Many of the words are used in other context, but the Jyot Prakash is the supreme…

There is only one creator, always will be…

Everything else is CREATION…

[Pallav2015]

On 1/20/2024 at 6:56 AM, MokhamSingh said:

If my name was Hari, Waheguru, Ram, Damodar etc…Is Gurbani praising me..?

Is Gurbani praising the Jyot that is the cause of everything..?

The Jyot Akal Purakh has no specific name…the Jyot empowers life and actions to take place…

SGGS only praises the Jyot…not individuals…

With all due respect if god is formless how did he get all those name ??

who’s is banwali?? 
ਮਹਲਾ ੧ ਘਰੁ ੧  “ਚੇਤਹੁ ਬਾਸੁਦੇਉ ਬਨਵਾਲੀ 
Guru Sahib has also used the name "Banwali" with Basudev. This word means “Remember in the heart Vasudeva Krishna or Vishnu wearing the garland of forest flowers”. Sikh scholars also confuse here and lie that this word is used for formless God. Bhai Sahib, the word "Banwali" means one who garlands the flowers of Ban (Vishnu). Have you ever seen a picture of Vishnu ji or Krishna ji wearing this garland around their neck. Does the formless God also wear this garland. Professor Sahib Singh ji has also played a trick on this page, he gives the wrong meaning of this word. But this Sahib Singh ji explains the real meaning of this Banwali word on another page, see Sahib Singh (Page 997), Banwali = Banmali, garlanded with Ban flower, Vishnu, God.
These things show whether these preachers deliberately misrepresent.
By the way, it is absolutely clear that this name is used for Krishna. But if we also assume that this name is used for his father. "Whose spirit is in their father?" Are these people making fun of Bani? How simple Punjabi is, anyone can read it. Think about it, it is with Punjabi, they are so wrongly translated, what bad situation would the kathavachak have done to the Hindu scriptures?
Now judge for yourself whether it is not impolite to tell a lie in the presence of Guru Sahib. Is it not sacrilegious to twist and misrepresent the words of Guru Sahib?