Jump to content

Who is Ragunath in gurbani


Pallav2015
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 1/20/2024 at 7:01 AM, MokhamSingh said:

Many of the words are used in other context, but the Jyot Prakash is the supreme…

There is only one creator, always will be…

Everything else is CREATION…

ਤੇਰੇ ਬੰਕੇ ਲੋਇਣ ਦੰਤ ਰੀਸਾਲਾ  ਸੋਹਣੇ ਨਕ ਜਿਨ ਲੰਮੜੇ ਵਾਲਾ  ਕੰਚਨ ਕਾਇਆ ਸੁਇਨੇ ਕੀ ਢਾਲਾ  ਸੋਵੰਨ ਢਾਲਾ ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨ ਮਾਲਾ ਜਪਹੁ ਤੁਸੀ ਸਹੇਲੀਹੋ ਜਮ ਦੁਆਰਿ  ਹੋਹੁ ਖੜੀਆ ਸਿਖ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਮਹੇਲੀਹੋ  (ਅੰਗ 567, ਵਡਹੰਸੁ ਮਹਲਾ  )

Today all the Sikhs are insisting that God is only formless, He has no color, no form. But see what Guru Sahib himself is writing. praise of Krishna, your teeth are like pearls. Your nose is very beautiful and you have long hair. Your body is very beautiful, golden shields (royal clothes) adorn it. O friends, if you chant that Krishna's name, you will not have to burn in the hells again. Now maybe someone will argue that this is the praise of Akal Purakh. Bhai Akal Purakh means one who has no size. But Guru Sahib is also telling the beauty of his hair and teeth. Singing the glories of his beautiful form. And you have also named whose glory they are singing.
 Dear brothers, today's Sikhs are sitting in the image of God, according to that thinking, you cannot explain the whole verse. Because according to your thoughts, the verse itself will be contradictory.
But there is no self-contradiction in Pyare Veer Bani. It is clear that Guru Sahib believed that both forms of God, material and formless, were the same. But today's Sikhs believe only one thing and reject the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Pallav2015 said:

With all due respect if god is formless how did he get all those name ??

who’s is banwali?? 
ਮਹਲਾ ੧ ਘਰੁ ੧  “ਚੇਤਹੁ ਬਾਸੁਦੇਉ ਬਨਵਾਲੀ 
Guru Sahib has also used the name "Banwali" with Basudev. This word means “Remember in the heart Vasudeva Krishna or Vishnu wearing the garland of forest flowers”. Sikh scholars also confuse here and lie that this word is used for formless God. Bhai Sahib, the word "Banwali" means one who garlands the flowers of Ban (Vishnu). Have you ever seen a picture of Vishnu ji or Krishna ji wearing this garland around their neck. Does the formless God also wear this garland. Professor Sahib Singh ji has also played a trick on this page, he gives the wrong meaning of this word. But this Sahib Singh ji explains the real meaning of this Banwali word on another page, see Sahib Singh (Page 997), Banwali = Banmali, garlanded with Ban flower, Vishnu, God.
These things show whether these preachers deliberately misrepresent.
By the way, it is absolutely clear that this name is used for Krishna. But if we also assume that this name is used for his father. "Whose spirit is in their father?" Are these people making fun of Bani? How simple Punjabi is, anyone can read it. Think about it, it is with Punjabi, they are so wrongly translated, what bad situation would the kathavachak have done to the Hindu scriptures?
Now judge for yourself whether it is not impolite to tell a lie in the presence of Guru Sahib. Is it not sacrilegious to twist and misrepresent the words of Guru Sahib?

 

BANWALI means…the creator of all jungles…BANMALI…the owner of all jungles…

Everything arises from the one and only creator…

Deities were created …they are not CREATOR..

The creator is formless…but can adopt any form too…

Electricity is formless…but can be seen in form of any electrically powered item…

SGGS only praises the Jyot..not deities…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am in big dilemma.  As we all know that waheguru ji everywhere. I also understand that it is important to go to gurudwara sahib as well. My question is that if i do ardaas at home or any other place other than  gurudwara sahib, will it be heard and acknowledged by guru sahib or it is always important to go to gurudwara sahib and do ardaas at gurudwara sahib for guru sahib to acknowledge it? I always do path and ardaas at home in front of harmandir sahib photo or hazur sahib photo  and then for important things i make a list and go to gurudwara sahib to do the ardaas there because i think that if i do ardaas in front of guru granth sahib then it will be more accepted by guru sahib. On the other hand i think that if i am doing ardaas in front of harmandir sahib or hazur sahib photo and redoing the same ardaas at gurudwara sahib, i feel that i am not respecting the authority of harmandir sahib or hazur sahib. Because of all this, I wait to find a quite time at gurudwara sahib when there is less or no sangat  so that I can open my list and read and do ardaas spend 10-15 minutes on average to do ardaas. If there are lot of people, i can't do ardaas due to people in the lineup and I don't want to block access to them while i am spending so much time doing ardaas. If i leave without doing ardaas then i am embarrassed, disappointed and sad and then OCD kicks in. Kindly help!    
    • Play/do gurbani, simran and keertan often, make sure you do your nitnem, use sarbloh and wear sarbloh!
    • process is to find a vichola and then the vichola talks between your family and theirs. The process should be similar to how rishta is done in India side!
    • No. If you read the histroy of Guru jis' times and even centuries later, usually marriages were done in childhood. Then when they were old enough to start their grihast jeevan partnership, the bride is brought over to her husbands's house in muklawa ceremony. 4-5 years engagement is silly. You get Anand Karaj now, and then after university she you do muklawa, that is much more in the guidelines!
    • you need to explain that even the devtay kept their kes, and is a part of the ancestors' culture, that sikhi is also preserving the kshatriya and dharmik cultures!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use