Jump to content

Oprah: 'too Much Ustat Ruined My Life!


AK-47
 Share

Recommended Posts

I do actually believe that oprah winfrey could well do a full show on how too much praising or ustat can ruin peoples lifes!

We all know people who we deem to be chardi kala or who do a bit more nitnem than we do or who keep better rehat than we do. Does the fact that this person is a bit 'better' than us mean that we should priase them?

Guru ji tells us to think were the lowest of the low and also tells us that both nindia and ustat are to be avoided. Nindia as it makes us feel better about other peoples weaknesses and ustat inflates our egos.

From what iv been told, if you respect somebody fine express that respect, but to do it to the person face isnt helping them in any way, your actually taking their sikhi away from them.

Its intresting to see so many people prasing so many other people sooooo much thats its silly!!!!

If people are telling you daily that you are the best thing since vegetarian egg free burgers then unfortunetly one day you may start believing them.. and what happens to your nimrata then if your not actually on that level of avasta??

What do you guys think? We all make an issue of not doing nindia, but what about ustat? Yes praise those who are worthy but not to their faces! all we do is breed more and more hunkar in those we admire!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fateh

I kinda agree with you AK-47. But it depends in the context in which Usttat is done. If it is done in a sincere way to let person know of your respec for them, then it can't be too bad if you do it in a humble way. But if you praise in a disingenuous or over the top way - then this is wrong, as it will boost the ego of the other person.

Same way with nindiya. If you criticise someone, but do so in a humble and constructive way, without intending to offend or harm them, then there is nothing wrong with this (but then this is technically not nindiya - it is constructive criticism). But if you do this in a malicious manner, then of course, that's bad.

I think its all to do with the intent with which the things are said or done.

Bhul Chuk Maaf

Waheguru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest SikhForLife

i remember reading a line in SGGS ji that struck me

something about gosspping behind backs is the same as praising upfront

cant find it now.. but heres something

ousathath ni(n)dhaa gur sam jaanaaee eis jug mehi laahaa har jap lai jaae ||1|| rehaao ||

The Guru has inspired me to realize, that praise and slander are one and the same; in this world, the profit is obtained by chanting the Name of the Lord. ||1||Pause||

-

-------------------

par ni(n)dhaa ousathath neh jaa kai ka(n)chan loh samaano ||

One who does not slander or praise others, who looks upon gold and iron alike,

harakh sog thae rehai atheethaa jogee thaahi bakhaano ||1||

who is free from pleasure and pain - he alone is called a true Yogi. ||1||

cha(n)chal man dheh dhis ko dhhaavath achal jaahi t(h)eharaano ||

The restless mind wanders in the ten directions - it needs to be pacified and restrained.

kahu naanak eih bidhh ko jo nar mukath thaahi thum maano ||2||3||

Says Nanak, whoever knows this technique is judged to be liberated. ||2||3||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use