Jump to content

Khalistan by 2007 !


Bir_Rass
 Share

Recommended Posts

Was just reading news across the web and found this article.

Khalistan will be formed by 2007, claims former sikh militant

Chandigarh: Khalistan proponent Jagjit Singh Chohan, a former Sikh militant based in Punjab, today said that Khalistan, a separate Sikh state, will be formed by 2007.

Chohan was addressing the media in Chandigarh.

“Khalistan will be formed in 2007. Whatever may be the circumstances, states are formed with International circumstances and not by using arms. It will be formed and will be called a part of South East Asia,” said Jagjit Singh Chohan.

Chohan also said that the concept of Khalistan was also proposed by the tenth Sikh guru Guru Gobind Singh.

“It has got a religious significance. If you read... you will find that there is a mention of Khalsa. Guru Gobind Singh had said that Khalistan will be formed and the present circumstances are in favour of its formation,” added Chohan.

“Our leader will be Simran Jeet Mann,” added Chohan.

Chohan assured that the Khalistan movement would be a peaceful one. He also said that all the people like Jagtar Singh Hawara who had been arrested on terrorist charges are innocents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Was just reading news across the web and found this article.

Khalistan will be formed by 2007, claims former sikh militant

Chandigarh: Khalistan proponent Jagjit Singh Chohan, a former Sikh militant based in Punjab, today said that Khalistan, a separate Sikh state, will be formed by 2007.

Chohan was addressing the media in Chandigarh.

“Khalistan will be formed in 2007. Whatever may be the circumstances, states are formed with International circumstances and not by using arms. It will be formed and will be called a part of South East Asia,” said Jagjit Singh Chohan.

Chohan also said that the concept of Khalistan was also proposed by the tenth Sikh guru Guru Gobind Singh.

“It has got a religious significance. If you read... you will find that there is a mention of Khalsa. Guru Gobind Singh had said that Khalistan will be formed and the present circumstances are in favour of its formation,” added Chohan.

“Our leader will be Simran Jeet Mann,” added Chohan.

Chohan assured that the Khalistan movement would be a peaceful one. He also said that all the people like Jagtar Singh Hawara who had been arrested on terrorist charges are innocents.

106567[/snapback]

Nice to see GOI agent Chohan once again trying to misrepresent Guru Gobind Singh Ji. It is a fact that Guru Ji never ever fought for territory and Guru Ji certainly did not advocate or mention Khalistan.

This man is a leach and many in the UK know about his real motives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was said by Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji that...

"Dharma (righteousness) cannot flourish without Raj (sovereignty),

Without Dharma nothing is of any value."

For example, France have already passed that turbans cannot be tied in schools etc and there is no real political leader with authority that seems to be doing anything about it. What if that was adpoted in the UK and USA?

We need to have a politcal presence as well. Hence, Sri Harmindar Sahib alongside the Sri Akal Takht Sahib. Miri and Piri.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Bhul Chuk Maaf Karna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who is Jagjit Singh Chohan??????????

grin.gif

106581[/snapback]

He is a failed Punjabi politician who got upset when he was overlooked for a ministers job and so he fell out of bed with the Congress. He then pulled a few stunts to try and get publicity and mysteriously turned up in the UK from where he orchestrated his campaign of stopping panthic unity and spying for the GOI.

After he had enough he fled back to India and now lives in his Mohali koti.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"a so called khalistan activist"

Does this mean this guy is making up nonsense or is he a true khalistani?

And Kurta's you said he is a GOI agent. How is he please explain for me and the people whodon't know who he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"a so called khalistan activist"

Does this mean this guy is making up nonsense or is he a true khalistani?

And Kurta's you said he is a GOI agent. How is he please explain for me and the people whodon't know who he is.

106775[/snapback]

He was an MLA in Punjab and want a ministers kursi. When the Congress denied him this he jumped on the Khalistan bandwagon.

He later conveniently turned up in London and after that the GOI started producing blacklists etc.

There was evidence of his being an agent on the internet a while back but it apparently vansihed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use