Jump to content

The Tradition / Significance Of A Sachkhand In A Gurdwara


thedoc
 Share

Recommended Posts

TIme change all the time, but why not change to?

Tmes may change but the GURU does not and niether does His maryadha.

Modern sikhs may have letters after their names as long as your arm but they have very little naam abhyas.

But the ego kicks in and anything they do not understand is labelled Manmat or they will demand proof.

This is indeed Kalyug. pray.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it funny how the most 'religious' people here often have the most idotic views when it comes to Sikhi.

Every one of Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharajs poets/hazoori sewadhars (Bhai Nand Lal Ji, Shaheed Bhai Mani Singh Ji, Bhai Dya Singh etc.) wrote how Guru Gobind Singh Ji himself said that the Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj was NOT A BOOK... and was in fact his physical BODY (its not a book of pages, its the gurus body with each 'page' being an ANG of his own body!)

So, the GURU GRANTH SAHIB JI is the Guru's body as we know. It's written clearly (read your history: suraj prakash granth for example.)

We can get into it as much as you like, but don't twist HISTORY and GURU Ji's own words. If you don't see the Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj as the physical GURU... then why do you BOW-Down when no BANI is being recited? Where is the Shabad GURU then?

I'll end with a simple quote by Bhai Nand Lal Ji...

"Eh Akre Nahi, Eh Patre Nahi

Eh Seena Hei Guru Arjan Dha"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it funny how the most 'religious' people here often have the most idotic views when it comes to Sikhi.

Every one of Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharajs poets/hazoori sewadhars (Bhai Nand Lal Ji, Shaheed Bhai Mani Singh Ji, Bhai Dya Singh etc.) wrote how Guru Gobind Singh Ji himself said that the Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj was NOT A BOOK... and was in fact his physical BODY (its not a book of pages, its the gurus body with each 'page' being an ANG of his own body!)

So, the GURU GRANTH SAHIB JI is the Guru's body as we know. It's written clearly (read your history: suraj prakash granth for example.)

We can get into it as much as you like, but don't twist HISTORY and GURU Ji's own words. If you don't see the Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj as the physical GURU... then why do you BOW-Down when no BANI is being recited? Where is the Shabad GURU then?

I'll end with a simple quote by Bhai Nand Lal Ji...

"Eh Akre Nahi, Eh Patre Nahi

Eh Seena Hei Guru Arjan Dha"

Wow, spot on! You hit the nail on the head, Singh! :TH:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use