Jump to content

Is Dastar A Punjabi Thing Or A Sikh Thing?


B4ND4
 Share

Recommended Posts

1. Is dastar a Punjabi thing or a Sikh Thing??

2. I see lot of men in dastars doing lots of stuff that they shouldn't be doing. Could a dastar on non-amritdhari be considered equivalent to karra on non-amritdharis??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Good thread, I just hope the mod doesn't delete it.

You can wear a

Kara

Kirpan

Kachera

Keski/Kes

Kanga

But they won't qualify as Kakkars as long as you ain't amritshak and don't follow the rehit given to you by your Panj.

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?s=&amp...st&p=252946

*sits and waits for this thread to get fired up with heated comments*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turban has always been part of Indian/Punjabi culture. People in India have been wearing turbans before Sikhi was even created. So to answer your first question, I will say both. It is a Punjabi and Sikh thing.

Agreed.

but why do they call every turban wearing person in Punjab or west a "sikh" ? Shouldn't they be called punjabis if they ain't following sikhi (we are talkin about people who wear turbans) ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turban has always been part of Indian/Punjabi culture. People in India have been wearing turbans before Sikhi was even created. So to answer your first question, I will say both. It is a Punjabi and Sikh thing.

Agreed.

but why do they call every turban wearing person in Punjab or west a "sikh" ? Shouldn't they be called punjabis if they ain't following sikhi (we are talkin about people who wear turbans) ?

Me personally, I let "God" decide who is a Sikh or not.

I think people who do call those "singhs" (the ones not following sikhi) Sikhs are usually the ones that think Punjabi culture and Sikhi is the same thing. Also the lack of knowledge of the sikh religion in the sikh community plays a role here as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "turban" or "dastaar" has been around for hundreds of years... way before Sikhi.... arabs/muslims wore turbans, and indian kings wore turbans... it was seen as a sign of wealth/status in india... many of those arabs/muslims who wore the turban were seen as 'holy men'.... there's also many africans, and rasta's who wear dastaar... so, by no means is it a 'copyright' of sikhi....

only ting is.. now the vast majority of those who dawn the dastaar are Sikh, so the world itself sees the 'turban' is a Sikh 'thing'...

for those who wear dastaar n do tings dem nah supposed to be doin, they shud tink twice and realize the importance, significance and symbolism of wha it is... same ting wit those who wear kara's (both amritdharee and non-amritdharee alike)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a side note, I find it funny how you only mention men. What about women who do bad things as well? I am sure there are keshdhari women out there that are just as bad as those non-practising keshdhari men too.

I never denied women don't do bad stuff but that isn't the question at hand bai, the question was about turbans. man you think too much and always go off-track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "turban" or "dastaar" has been around for hundreds of years... way before Sikhi.... arabs/muslims wore turbans, and indian kings wore turbans... it was seen as a sign of wealth/status in india... many of those arabs/muslims who wore the turban were seen as 'holy men'.... there's also many africans, and rasta's who wear dastaar... so, by no means is it a 'copyright' of sikhi....

only ting is.. now the vast majority of those who dawn the dastaar are Sikh, so the world itself sees the 'turban' is a Sikh 'thing'...

for those who wear dastaar n do tings dem nah supposed to be doin, they shud tink twice and realize the importance, significance and symbolism of wha it is... same ting wit those who wear kara's (both amritdharee and non-amritdharee alike)

Agreed.

Should the media label them as sikhs or something else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Umm, that's totally irrational, bro. There are plenty of prakash-dara Singhs in Punjab (less than we'd like, but still plenty). No one cares that you are sabat soorat. It isn't 1986. You can walk around in chola, kurta-pajama, or jeans. Whatever. If you want the look @dallysingh101 is referring to, just go into a cheap clothing shop (not a Western-style mall) and buy some shirts for 250 rupees or a track suit for 2000 rupees. You'll get the cheap stuff made in some sweatshop in Bombay.
    • The Mind is Jyot Saroop (Waheguru), but the mind is under the influence of five evils… Through Naam Simran( Rememberance), the mind will begin to detach from evil, and get back to its original form ( MANN TU JYOT SAROOP HEH)… Until the mind breaks free from the five evils, one will go through the cycle of paap and punn….which leads to Karma… Naam Simran destroys past karma, and prevents new karma coming into fruition… I did this, I did that… This non realisation of the Jyot Saroop gives rise to paap and Punn, which in turn gives birth to suffering and misery…
    • I agree we're not born with sin like the Christians think. Also I agree we have effects of karma. But Gurbani does state that the body contains both sin and charity (goodness): ਕਾਇਆ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਪਾਪੁ ਪੁੰਨੁ ਦੁਇ ਭਾਈ ॥ Within the body are the two brothers sin and virtue. p126 Actually, we do need to be saved. Gurbani calls this "udhaar" (uplift). Without Satguru, souls are liable to spiritual death: ਜਿਨਾ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨ ਭੇਟਿਓ ਸੇ ਭਾਗਹੀਣ ਵਸਿ ਕਾਲ ॥ p40 Those who have not met Satguru Purakh are unfortunate and liable to death. So, yeah, we do need to be saved, and Guru ji does the saving. The reason Satguru is the one to save is because God has given Satguru the "key" (kunji): ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਥਿ ਕੁੰਜੀ ਹੋਰਤੁ ਦਰੁ ਖੁਲੈ ਨਾਹੀ ਗੁਰੁ ਪੂਰੈ ਭਾਗਿ ਮਿਲਾਵਣਿਆ ॥੭॥ In the True Guru's hand is the key. None else can open the door. By perfect good fortune the Guru is met. p124
    • That's unfortunate to hear. Could you give any more information? Who was this "baba"? He just disappeared with people's money? Obviously, you should donate your money to known institutions or poor people that you can verify the need of through friends and family in Punjab.
    • Sangat ji,  I know a family who went Sevewal to do seva sometimes end of 2019. They returned last year in great dismay and heart broken.  To repent for their mistakes they approached panj pyaare. The Panj gave them their punishment / order to how t make it up which, with Kirpa, they fulfilled.  They were listening to a fake Baba who, in the end, took all the "Donations " and fled sometime over a year ago. For nearly 4 years this family (who are great Gursikhs once u get to know them) wasted time and effort for this fake Baba. NOT ONLY this one fam. But many, many did worldwide and they took their fam to do seva, in village Sevewal, city Jaitho in Punjab. In the end many families lost money in thousands being behind this Baba. The family, on return, had to get in touch with all the participants and told them to stop.  I am stating this here to create awareness and we need to learn from whom we follow and believe. It's no easy but if we follow the 3 S (Sangat, Simran and Seva) we will be shown the light. As I am writing this the family in question have been doing the same since 2008 onwards and they fell for this Baba... it is unbelievable and shocking.  This am writing in a nutshell as am at work on my break so not lengthy but it deserves a great length.  Especially the family in question, who shed light on youngsters about Sikhi 20 plus years!! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use