Jump to content

Sikh Youth Denied Entry Into Us Nightclub


Greater-Punjab
 Share

Recommended Posts

NEW YORK: A Sikh youth has approached the US justice department after he was allegedly denied entry into two nightclubs in California because he was wearing a turban.

Dave Bindra, a student at Carlsbad's Gemological Institute of America, went to the nightclubs but wasn't let in because they have rules against turbans and other head wear. Bindra claimed that one of the club managers told him it didn't matter that the turban was a religious headgear.

"Beanie, do-rag or turban, you still have a towel on your head and you're not going in," Steve Town, manager of one of the nightclubs, reportedly told the 22-year-old youth.

Town, however, has denied making the "towel" remark and said Bindra and his friends were denied entry because they were being aggressive, the online edition of Union-Tribune reported.

Bindra also claimed that Aaron Williams, general manager of another nightclub Coyote, said it had nothing to do with attacking his religion. "We have a no-hat, no head wear policy when we have a DJ," Williams reportedly said.

When Bindra tried to explain that Sikhs wear a turban as an expression of their faith, Williams said: I'm not judging anyone for their religion. Anybody can come in here and say, 'I'm wearing this because it's my religion'."

"Incidents of discrimination against Sikhs have increased since the Sep 11, 2001, attacks and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq," said Rajbir Singh Datta, a spokesman for the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund (SALDEF.

Datta said his organisation has contacted the Community Relations Service of the US Justice Department, which mediates in instances of racial and ethnic discrimination.

If the clubs did deny Bindra service because he wore a turban, he would have a strong claim against them, said David Steinberg, a professor of civil rights law at San Diego's Thomas Jefferson School of Law.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Indians...how/2311642.cms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

on the bad side.............i dont think sikhs belong in a club it gives off the wrong message.

on the good side...........atleast he was wearin a turban most of them wear caps now.......What the hell is that all about???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today, ignorance against the turban (and Sikhs) is shown at nightclub doors so you applaud the prejudice shown. Tommorow this precedent of ignorance will spread to schools, air travel, workplaces, etc. (and already has) and then you'll wonder how and why such ignorance against "your people" could happen. The short-sightedness is astounding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Narinder Singh
Today, ignorance against the turban (and Sikhs) is shown at nightclub doors so you applaud the prejudice shown. Tommorow this precedent of ignorance will spread to schools, air travel, workplaces, etc. (and already has) and then you'll wonder how and why such ignorance against "your people" could happen. The short-sightedness is astounding.

respect.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use