Jump to content

London - Religion Not Race Segregates City


dalsingh101
 Share

Recommended Posts

Religion not race segregates city

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6978116.stm

The university of East London has created a map showing the city as a patchwork of religious enclaves.

It show that in some areas, minority religions make up 80% of the population.

Only 3% of London's seven million residents live in areas classed as racially segregated, but 25% live in religiously-segregated neighbourhoods.

The study also questioned whether ministers are right - after the 2001 race riots and the 7 July bombings - to attempt to tackle segregation.

Forge links

The findings indicated living in segregated communities could actually benefit some of the minorities involved, although Muslims were more likely to be "trapped" in deprived areas and less likely to forge links with other groups living around them.

Professor Allan Brimicombe, author of the study based on census data, said: "Traditionally the amount of residential segregation in London has been looked at in terms of ethnicity.

Any government plan that talks about 'parallel lives' and a lack of integration being a bad thing is missing the point - it's not bad for everybody

Professor Allan Brimicombe

"By ethnicity there is not very much residential segregation. But when you turn it around and look at religious self-identity we see there is a lot of segregation in London by minority religious groups."

The city's religious breakdown was then compared with information indicating deprivation, such as educational qualifications and housing types.

"We found that a level of segregation actually seems to improve the lot of people living in areas that are segregated along religious self-identity lines," said the author.

Muslims 'trapped'

"The Jews, Hindus and Sikhs seem to be better off in areas that are dominated by their own religion, except for the Muslim-dominated areas which get progressively worse off as they become more segregated.

"Any government plan that talks about 'parallel lives' and a lack of integration being a bad thing is missing the point - it's not bad for everybody.

"But for one group, the Muslims, they seem to be trapped in a spiral where they can't seem to move out of high deprivation areas."

Concentrated communities of Muslims are found in the boroughs of Tower Hamlets and Newham; Jews in Harrow, Barnet and north Hackney; and Hindus in Brent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you grow up in a totally segregated society, where everybody around you believes that segregation is proper, you have a hard time. You can't believe how much it's a part of your thinking.

Segregation was wrong when it was forced by white people, and I believe it is still wrong when it is requested by black people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you grow up in a totally segregated society, where everybody around you believes that segregation is proper, you have a hard time. You can't believe how much it's a part of your thinking.

Segregation was wrong when it was forced by white people, and I believe it is still wrong when it is requested by black people.

I don't know, what do you do when certain people just want to live by themselves. Plenty seem to want to do this. It explains white flight from areas with large ethnic populations as well as ghettoing by minorities.

There is a fear that consumes some people that centres around being absorbed or made insignificant by other groups. This leads to segregation. Sometimes the fear is based on paranoia, sometimes on a reality.

People are generally reluctant of great change and seek comfort in familiarity....this explains the white fear of having their culture irrevocably altered by migration as well as reluctance on the part of immigrants to assimilate. I believe they are looking for perpetuity in lifestyles. Rightly or wrongly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The Jews, Hindus and Sikhs seem to be better off in areas that are dominated by their own religion, except for the Muslim-dominated areas which get progressively worse off as they become more segregated.

Very interesting....

Though, there aren't a lot of Sikhs in UK, right?

About half a million apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The Jews, Hindus and Sikhs seem to be better off in areas that are dominated by their own religion, except for the Muslim-dominated areas which get progressively worse off as they become more segregated.

Very interesting....

Though, there aren't a lot of Sikhs in UK, right?

About half a million apparently.

That is more than Canada I believe.

Anyway, what are the sikh areas in the UK? Here in Canada, most sikh areas has somewhat a high crime rate. I hope that isn't the same case with UK sikh areas.

I seriously need to go to England and check out these areas. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The Jews, Hindus and Sikhs seem to be better off in areas that are dominated by their own religion, except for the Muslim-dominated areas which get progressively worse off as they become more segregated.

Very interesting....

Though, there aren't a lot of Sikhs in UK, right?

About half a million apparently.

That is more than Canada I believe.

Anyway, what are the sikh areas in the UK? Here in Canada, most sikh areas has somewhat a high crime rate. I hope that isn't the same case with UK sikh areas.

I seriously need to go to England and check out these areas. LOL

Southall used to be Sikh 15 years ago but not now. Gravesend has a big Sikh population. I think there are small pockets in Wolverhampton, Leicester and Birmingham. Maybe people can let us know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The report confirms what most people in the know have suspected. Muslim immigrants have a negative impact on the host country. Due to their activities multiculturalism is being described as a failed policy and has become a dirty word in most circles. Hard won rights such as the right to have a Kirpan are increasing under attack due to the security situation created by Muslim terrorism. In the US Sikhs will now have their Turbans removed and searched all thanks to the activities of Muslim terrorists. While non-Muslim faith schools do well Muslim faith school are failures and one was in the news recently for using Saudi textbooks which promote hate against Jews and Christians thereby giving all faith schools a bad name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use