Jump to content

Anand Karaj, Women


Guest gobinday
 Share

Recommended Posts

Remember, the laavaa were written by Guru Ramdaas jee, and the custom was/is that woman walks behind man, its not about being sexist or guru sahib doesn't consider them equal its just customary, who are we to change it? Both wearing bana holding sri sahibs, some like it that way some don't so thats personal choice, but the method of doing lava shouldn't be changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest gobinday
Remember, the laavaa were written by Guru Ramdaas jee, and the custom was/is that woman walks behind man, its not about being sexist or guru sahib doesn't consider them equal its just customary, who are we to change it? Both wearing bana holding sri sahibs, some like it that way some don't so thats personal choice, but the method of doing lava shouldn't be changed.

IT DOESNT SAY ANYWHERE THAT THE MAN MUST WALK IN FRONT

ITS NOT CHANGING THE METHOD OF LAVAAN AT ALL, there is no Gender before AKaal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest gobinday
^^^ pls send pics of ur wedding, i hope to see the penje to be before u :)

all the best jee.

fateh!

wjkk, wjkf

definitely, IF i get married that is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if the couple is amritdhari, then ofcourse they both will have kirpans, : )

they should both hold kirpans anyway, a man is not superior in any way and should not be the only one to hold a kirpan

One wedding I went to I asked the couple why the man was holding a sri sahib - he sed its 'tradition'. Loadza ppl hold sri sahibs for the sake of it - so if u ask em why the men hold sri sahibs and the women dont they can't answer.

My friend sent me a pic of her cousin who got married - his wife's sri sahib was waaay bigger thn his - i woz lyk rock on bibi ji :p her family wasnt very happy tho :gg:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest gobinday
if the couple is amritdhari, then ofcourse they both will have kirpans, : )

they should both hold kirpans anyway, a man is not superior in any way and should not be the only one to hold a kirpan

One wedding I went to I asked the couple why the man was holding a sri sahib - he sed its 'tradition'. Loadza ppl hold sri sahibs for the sake of it - so if u ask em why the men hold sri sahibs and the women dont they can't answer.

My friend sent me a pic of her cousin who got married - his wife's sri sahib was waaay bigger thn his - i woz lyk rock on bibi ji :p her family wasnt very happy tho :gg:

Waheguru!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the bibi shudnt be dressed like a 'hindu' with all red and gold jewellery. simple is best.

Obvioudly both singh and singhni should be wearing kirpans. Not sure if it matters whose holding one or not, just for how really.

I think it should be left as singh in front, bibi behind, this has been done for years, also in bhai sahibs time, why change it now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its hilarious how u guys refer and date bak to bhai sahibs time

nothing wrong with that, but sikh history goes a BIT further

gobinday, ur causing unnecessary conflict

this anand karaj tradition of man in front has gone on since maharaj's time, why change it now

as for dressing up like bahmanh and bahmanhis, i side withyou

an anand karaj should ideally be done in full banha, no jewelry whatsoever

i went to this one anand karj, where the singh had a pistol on a gatra next to his kirpaan, sant ji style, it was pretty sick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest gobinday
its hilarious how u guys refer and date bak to bhai sahibs time

nothing wrong with that, but sikh history goes a BIT further

gobinday, ur causing unnecessary conflict

this anand karaj tradition of man in front has gone on since maharaj's time, why change it now

as for dressing up like bahmanh and bahmanhis, i side withyou

an anand karaj should ideally be done in full banha, no jewelry whatsoever

i went to this one anand karj, where the singh had a pistol on a gatra next to his kirpaan, sant ji style, it was pretty sick

well seing as you talked about Sant Bhindranwale, i would like to say that Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale said that women should go in front of men in Lavaan, there is no difference between man and women, they are equal

if you think taht men should go in front then it just shows me that you think men are superior

and no its not 'tradition' there is no specification if a woman or man should go in front and there have been Anand Karaj where the woman is in front

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Umm, that's totally irrational, bro. There are plenty of prakash-dara Singhs in Punjab (less than we'd like, but still plenty). No one cares that you are sabat soorat. It isn't 1986. You can walk around in chola, kurta-pajama, or jeans. Whatever. If you want the look @dallysingh101 is referring to, just go into a cheap clothing shop (not a Western-style mall) and buy some shirts for 250 rupees or a track suit for 2000 rupees. You'll get the cheap stuff made in some sweatshop in Bombay.
    • The Mind is Jyot Saroop (Waheguru), but the mind is under the influence of five evils… Through Naam Simran( Rememberance), the mind will begin to detach from evil, and get back to its original form ( MANN TU JYOT SAROOP HEH)… Until the mind breaks free from the five evils, one will go through the cycle of paap and punn….which leads to Karma… Naam Simran destroys past karma, and prevents new karma coming into fruition… I did this, I did that… This non realisation of the Jyot Saroop gives rise to paap and Punn, which in turn gives birth to suffering and misery…
    • I agree we're not born with sin like the Christians think. Also I agree we have effects of karma. But Gurbani does state that the body contains both sin and charity (goodness): ਕਾਇਆ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਪਾਪੁ ਪੁੰਨੁ ਦੁਇ ਭਾਈ ॥ Within the body are the two brothers sin and virtue. p126 Actually, we do need to be saved. Gurbani calls this "udhaar" (uplift). Without Satguru, souls are liable to spiritual death: ਜਿਨਾ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨ ਭੇਟਿਓ ਸੇ ਭਾਗਹੀਣ ਵਸਿ ਕਾਲ ॥ p40 Those who have not met Satguru Purakh are unfortunate and liable to death. So, yeah, we do need to be saved, and Guru ji does the saving. The reason Satguru is the one to save is because God has given Satguru the "key" (kunji): ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਥਿ ਕੁੰਜੀ ਹੋਰਤੁ ਦਰੁ ਖੁਲੈ ਨਾਹੀ ਗੁਰੁ ਪੂਰੈ ਭਾਗਿ ਮਿਲਾਵਣਿਆ ॥੭॥ In the True Guru's hand is the key. None else can open the door. By perfect good fortune the Guru is met. p124
    • That's unfortunate to hear. Could you give any more information? Who was this "baba"? He just disappeared with people's money? Obviously, you should donate your money to known institutions or poor people that you can verify the need of through friends and family in Punjab.
    • Sangat ji,  I know a family who went Sevewal to do seva sometimes end of 2019. They returned last year in great dismay and heart broken.  To repent for their mistakes they approached panj pyaare. The Panj gave them their punishment / order to how t make it up which, with Kirpa, they fulfilled.  They were listening to a fake Baba who, in the end, took all the "Donations " and fled sometime over a year ago. For nearly 4 years this family (who are great Gursikhs once u get to know them) wasted time and effort for this fake Baba. NOT ONLY this one fam. But many, many did worldwide and they took their fam to do seva, in village Sevewal, city Jaitho in Punjab. In the end many families lost money in thousands being behind this Baba. The family, on return, had to get in touch with all the participants and told them to stop.  I am stating this here to create awareness and we need to learn from whom we follow and believe. It's no easy but if we follow the 3 S (Sangat, Simran and Seva) we will be shown the light. As I am writing this the family in question have been doing the same since 2008 onwards and they fell for this Baba... it is unbelievable and shocking.  This am writing in a nutshell as am at work on my break so not lengthy but it deserves a great length.  Especially the family in question, who shed light on youngsters about Sikhi 20 plus years!! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use