Jump to content

Migrant Labour (bhaiya) Cut Kesh Of Amritdhari Boy In Punjab


apne
 Share

Recommended Posts

Send these Bhaiyas back to UP, Haryana and Bihar.

Instead take labour force of Sikligar Sikh, Vanjara Sikhs, Lobana Sikhs, Satnami Sikhs...

Bhaiyas are the real cause of drugs and crime in Punjab.

Before there used to be dacoits. But after green revolution, there was no crime anymore. But when these bhaiyas came in late 70s, they took with them all crimes + drugs.

If the good ones are be kept, and criminal bhaiyas sent back, bhaiya population will decrease by 85-90%

Imagine the Canadian government saying that about Punjabis in Vancouver. They are contributing to a drug problem in a big way and indulge in murdering their wives and each other over drug deals - kick them out!!

The people to blame the most for this (if it is a problem) are our own people who are just too damn lazy to work the fields anymore.

You talk like people from Sikh backgrounds don't do drugs and consume "impressive" amounts of sharaab themselves.

Wake up and use your brain a bit mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

these bhaiyas r beginning to act as if they run punjab now days, these rats would never have done this in sant jis days let alone even think about it. They have no right to cut anyones hair no matter what class citezens they are. RAJU DESERVES TO DIE

I hope you realise that not every bhaiya has cut a Sikhs hair just because one has :rolleyes: ...

Also, if it assauges your alarm about people of a different ethnicity working in Punjab, some of them are becoming Amritdhari.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt any of the people who are defending the bhaiya cutting an Amritdhari's hair know anything about Punjab. Bhaiyas don't get mistreated, if anything the anti-bhaiya feelings are a result of firstly Punjabis treating the bhaiyas well and then being repaid with murder, abduction of women and robbery in return. Punjabi farmers used to treat the bhaiyas as family members, allowing them to stay in the family home rather than keeping them separate from the family. In many cases, these bhaiyas have used the opportunity to find out where the valuables are kept and sometimes murdered entire families just to get a few thousand rupees and jewelry. As for the person who said Bhaiyas work hard, that's a laugh. Most expect to get paid for sitting on their backsides. Because the Indian govt has ensured that Punjabi agriculture isn't mechanised and because the traditional Punjabi labour have govt jobs reserved for them, the Punjabi farmer can either hire a lazy bhaiya and hope he does a day's work or leave his crops to rot. It's only in the factories and brick kilns that these bhaiyas are forced to do a full days work. Most bhaiyas in the fields do 1/2 the work a Punjabi would do if he could be bothered to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Singhavelli,

You might want to get off your high horse and put away your marxist class struggle claptrap and actually visit the place you seem to know a lot about to see what the reality is, i doubt you've even been to a pind in Punjab going by what you write.

Singhavelli is questioning your prejudice opinions towards these bhiyai...and yes u are being prejudice in my opinion, the same way people are prejudice against sikhs in the west as being drunks, hotheads etc. you counter the same mistakes people make against sikhs and im sure you cant stand it when people think sikhs are angry alcoholics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is is prejudice to point out the facts to people who don't know what the reality of a situation is. Ask anyone in Punjab and they will tell you that the Punjabi farmers treated the bhaiyas like family but the situation changed when the farmer realised what kind of people these bhaiyas are. Sitting in Canada and reading books about marxism doesn't make people experts in the bhaiya situation in Punjab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Whatever problems the Afghan Sikhs have or Punjabi Sikhs have, it's much better to support them than the Muslims.
    • So, are you saying Guru ji isn't God? Or are you saying the British encouraged this belief?
    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use