Jump to content

Clarifications On Dasam Granth


Inder Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

These works are attributed to Dasam Patshah:

1. Dasam Granth

2. Sarbloh Granth

3. Puranmasi Katha

4. Mukt Marg Granth

5. Prem Sumarag Granth

6. Vidya Sagar Granth (never found after it was drown in river Sirsa)

Now these works are attributed to guru Ji.

The first 2 are quite known... But the other 3? What are the sangats view about this? And also Kam1825, you once said in a topic you would scan and post Puranmasi Katha... Please do it. It would be amazing seva and i would be thankfull to you.

Wasnt Prem Sumarag Granth written somewhere near the 1800s? Is there any Brahmgyani Ji that said that Prem Sumarag was written by Guru ji?

And what is Mukt Marag Granth all about?

Sorry if i offended anyone, but this just seems TOO interesting.

Bhul Chuk Maaf

WJKK WJKF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well actually SGPC has banned Charitropakhyan/Tria Chariter...

"The S.G.P.C. has called it a Puranic myth and not work of the Tenth Guru.."

"The SGPC, vide its letter no. 36672 dated 3. 8. 1972, has declared to be a composition from Hindu mythology and not by the Tenth Master, could have been combined with sacred gurbani by any Sikh"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well actually SGPC has banned Charitropakhyan/Tria Chariter...

"The S.G.P.C. has called it a Puranic myth and not work of the Tenth Guru.."

"The SGPC, vide its letter no. 36672 dated 3. 8. 1972, has declared to be a composition from Hindu mythology and not by the Tenth Master, could have been combined with sacred gurbani by any Sikh"

SGPC has not banned Charitropakhayan.That letter is fake.

Cahritopakhayan is not hindu myth.These are mythical stories with moral lessons.Charitra 1 and last charitra that is chaupai sahib are about akal purakh.

Chandi charitras are in stndard version.Malkaus ki vaar is taken out.Incidentally i see no reason why Malkaus ki vaar should be taken out.

It starts as

ik oankar waheguru ji ki fateh

Vaar malkaus ki patshahi 10

Malkaus dhun bisal banai

Alakh nam sacha sadai

Jab Dono hada ek rakhai

nanak Eh bidh sache ko ban ayi

Nanak jo prabh bhavange

Har ji har mandar avenge

Sorry mate.

My mistake, it was CHARITROPAKHYAN and not CHANDI CHARITAR that wasnt included. Sorry again. I edited tht post.

Both these compositions are there in standard version

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shastr

charitropakhyan is the one with 405 charitars right? well that is included in the bir with 1428 angs, along with chandi charitar, cuz i was about to say, how on earth would they take out chandi charitar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

charitropakhyan is the one with 405 charitars right? well that is included in the bir with 1428 angs, along with chandi charitar, cuz i was about to say, how on earth would they take out chandi charitar.

There are 404 Charitras.Chandi di vaar and Charitropakhayan are included in standard Dasam granth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shastr

"ett sri charitropakhyane tariya charitare mantri bhoop sambadhe char sau panch charitar sumapath mast sub mast afjoo, dohora"

thats from sampooran reheraas sahib. "char sau panch", as in 405...... right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"ett sri charitropakhyane tariya charitare mantri bhoop sambadhe char sau panch charitar sumapath mast sub mast afjoo, dohora"

thats from sampooran reheraas sahib. "char sau panch", as in 405...... right?

This is the concluding verse of Chaupai sahib

ਚੌਪਈ ॥

चौपई ॥

CHAUPAI

ਸੰਬਤ ਸੱਤ੍ਰਹ ਸਹਸ ਭਣਿੱਜੈ ॥ ਅਰਧ ਸਹਸ ਫੁਨਿ ਤੀਨਿ ਕਹਿੱਜੈ ॥

स्मबत स्त्रह सहस भणि्जै ॥ अरध सहस फुनि तीनि कहि्जै ॥

It was Bikrami Samvat 1753;

ਭਾਦ੍ਰਵ ਸੁਦੀ ਅਸ਼ਟਮੀ ਰਵਿ ਵਾਰਾ ॥ ਤੀਰ ਸਤੁੱਦ੍ਰਵ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸੁਧਾਰਾ ॥੪੦੫॥

भाद्रव सुदी अशटमी रवि वारा ॥ तीर सतु्द्रव ग्रंथ सुधारा ॥४०५॥

This book was competed on the banks of Sutlej on Sunday, the eighth Sudi of the month of Bhadon.

There are 404 Charitras before that .Chaupai sahib is not numbered in Charitra.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use