Jump to content

Hmmm...


Dukh Nivaran
 Share

Recommended Posts

Well, a well known relative came over yesterday and we all having a good time. Well I have a calander of Sant Bhindranwale Ji and all the Shaheeds of '84 and he happened to notice it. He asked me whether I was Khalistani and we got into a conversation. BTW, he even admitted that he hasn't researched it or anything but he couldn't help but ask - If Bhindranwale was such a Sant and soldier why didn't he come out instead of allowing the Akal Takht to fall, like how Guru Gobind Singh Ji gave Kurbani. Of course I gave some reasons but not very believable ones. My dad sort of defended it and gave some reasons but not very believable ones. This man is coming over today and I want to convince him that Bhindranwale was truly great. Got anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Singhs came out to fight, the army would have claimed they were attacked first and had a good reason to counter attack. They would have destroyed everything anyway.

By staying inside Darbar Sahib, it is clear that the army attcked them first and they defended themselves. There was no arrest warrant or anything else that the police could arrest Sant Ji with. The army never asked those inside to come out - if they did, there wouldn't have been 'civilian' deaths.

Due to Sant Ji's efforts and parchaar, Sikhi was flourishing. People gave up alcohol, drugs, crime etc and started doing Paath, keeping Kesh and becoming Amritdhari.

They stood up against unfair treatment from the Centre towards Punjab and against corrupt leaders.

The best way to find out more about Sant Ji is to listen to their speeches and read interviews e.g. in the book 'Fighting for Faith and Nation' and 'Gallant Defender' - you can download this for free, just Google it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they really wanted Sant Ji, they could have...

  • Sent armed commandos in civil appearance inside and arrested him
  • Targeted him using snipers from buildings around Akal Takhat
  • Arrested him during his speeches and processions
  • Staged a fake encounter to get rid of him

But no, they chose to attack the spirit of the Sikhs. They attacked 42 other Gurdwaras all over Punjab. No militant was there, so why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

indira gandhi purposely attacked the golden temple on the day she did because there was a gurpurb meaning alot of sangat would be coming. She was focused on killing sikhs and ppl just like to blame Sant ji which i dont understan becuz he stood up against her he didnt go and hide away like longowal and say thing he didnt mean!

bhul buk maff

i read gallant defender a while a go and u sould deinately read it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use