Jump to content

The Word "Ram Ram" In The Guru Granth Sahib


Recommended Posts

WJKK WJKF

ADMINS please ntoe Balbir Singh remarks in a response above - claiming our two high calibre personalities in Sikhism Bhai Gurdaas and Bhai Desa Singh not sikhs quoting

"These two personalities are not the Gurus of Sikhs. No Sikh should follow others than his Guru."

secondly Balbir singh is no believer in the amrit ceremony and he quotes:

"Amrit ceremony is not to believe."

And to you Balbir Singh you are no Sikh of the SGGS due the following reasons:

1. attach the word SINGH when you don't beleive how one becomes a singh

2. You're distasteful remarks on Bhai Gurdass and Bhai Desa Singh are unacceptable.

3. You have no Guru

Only peacce of advice for you is to delve deeper with respect for Sikh personalitiies and away from your own warped interpetations of SGGS, it will not work Balbir..never will and it never has for personalites such as yourseld, no matter how hard you try. You will if your karms permit you will have to realign your thought process properly at some stage for that I bid you best of Luck especially without no GURU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pray Truth for all and say Satsriakaal!

Dear Sall Jee!

Those who have wished once in the past leaving their Guru find and follow others in this human life.

Strange, some engage in activities which the true Gurus never suggest and expect recognition for it also.

With this post you have sowed new seeds in your heart and mind fields. I wish and pray rich crops for you.

*****

Let us say Raam tuning in with the reverend Gurus and join the Satsang.

Balbir Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

CAN YOU GUIDE ME THEN WHO IS THAT RAAM . ???

AND WHO IS BHAKT DHRUV AND BHAKT PRAHLADH ??

Ram Japo Ji Aise Aise, Dhru Prahlad Japeyo Har Jaise

..................................

If by meditate on raam you mean ramchandar, then that is nothing short of blasphemy. Guru Maharaj is Nirankaar himself and it would be ridiculous to say he would meditate on a mortal creation of HIS.

There is no way sri raam or sri krishan ji were sargun saroop of Vaheguroo, this idea directly contradicts Gurbani.

Firstly, as in the tuk I gave in my earlier post shows, Gurbani has made a clear distinction between Akaal Purakh Vaheguroo and Sri Raam Chandar, stating he is contained only in himself.

also

Sri Dasam Granth:

ਜਿਤੇ ਰਾਮ ਸੇ ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨ ਹੁਇ ਬਿਸਨ ਆਏ ॥ ਤਿਤਿਓ ਕਾਲ ਖਾਪਿਓ ਨ ਤੇ ਕਾਲ ਘਾਏ ॥੨੮॥

All the incarnations of Vishnu like Rama and Krishan were destroyed by KAL, but they could not destroy him. 28.

and

ਕਿਤੇ ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨ ਸੇ ਕੀਟ ਕੋਟੈ ਬਨਾਏ ॥ ਕਿਤੇ ਰਾਮ ਸੇ ਮੇਟਿ ਡਾਰੇ ਉਪਾਏ ॥

Somewhere He hath created millions of the worms like Krishna. Somewhere He hath effaced and then created (many) like Rama.

There is no doubt both Sri Krishan Ji and Sri Raamchandar ji were great, but lets not get carried away saying they are like Guru Maharaj.

bhull chukk maaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The following two tuks will definitely clear the mind and answer the original question.

Ram Gayo Rawan Gaoy - this I understand to mean Ram Chander left this abode.

Ram Naam Urmay Gayo, Ja Ke Sam Nahin Koye - this tuk gives importance to Naam. Which naam? Ram Naam.

If we see within the Hindu religion, there is another difference between Ram and Ram Naam.

Because when somebody dies, they carry the demised body and chant, "Ram Naam Sat Hai"

Nothing can be Sat if it is perishable. It clearly shows that Ram Naam and Ram Chander are very different altogether.

alpha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use