Jump to content

Dont Allow Baaj Party (Sohi) To Return To Power! Benti From Khalsa Aid


KHALSA AID
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yes Gurpreet is to blame for this RSS Sohi Victory BUT MALHI has to also take the blame he claimed HINDUSTAN was his homeland and that he would salute the tiranga Hindu India flag at any time on SIkh Channel he said this in the leaders debate.

MALHI DROVE Gurpreet out,

President of Sri Guru Singh Sabha Southall Didar Singh Randhawa and a few other members openly refused to stand for the lion party due the abuse Malhi spewed at them all the good work was done due to the pardhan and his partners not Malhi.Malhi openly swore at them after Didar Singh Randhawa stated in sangat that he was President not Malhi.Randhawa refused to stand in this election for Lion party as he knew Malhi would be the same control freak he was before trying to sit in commitee meetings when he wasnt even a member!

Malhi also wanted his companies and those of his mates to build the KHALSA SCHOOL President Didar Singh Randhawa refused to give Malhi permission to use his own comapanies to build the school,

ALL IN ALL MALHI IS THE ROOT CAUSE FOR HIS OWN DOOM AND THAT OF THE SHER PARTY HAD HE NOT ABUSED PEOPLE IN THE PARTY SOHI WOULD STILL BE ON THE ROAD.

MALHI= CONGRESSS

SOHI= BJP/RSS

= INDIA HOUSE LONDON = INDIAN GOVT= HINDU ATHVADHIS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Southall Gursikh naujawaan need to step up NOW, create a Panthic platform, build a team and public awareness, to kick out all politicians with anti-Sikh, pro-Indian govt links. Your TWO years of work before the next election start NOW. Southall GurSikh youth should never let this kind of thing happen again to the biggest Gurdwara in the western hemisphere. Take inspiration from the naujawaan of Surrey BC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a shame Khalsa Aid has misinformed members by making a posting without establishing facts.

Most worrying is the accusation that Mr Sohi sued the Gurdwara for £500,000. This is totally incorrect. The case of wrongful expulsion was against the 21 committee members and NOT the Gurdwara. And it was only after several failed attempts to resolve the matter outside the courts. It was the Sher Group committee that deemed it appropriate to use the sangat's money and not pay the fees themselves – why has this not been asked of the outgoing committee.

Whilst I agree that progress has been made on sports and martial arts clubs I cannot recall inspiring seminars and talks on drug abuse, human rights abuses etc (although I am not saying that there were none). Which affiliations/loyalties do you refer to which would prevent such topics being discussed?

It is also mentioned that the Sher Group has saved millions – once again the facts show that income was down compared to the final year of the previous committee once the £5million grant for the school was subtracted from the figures.

I appeal to everyone to please make conclusions based on fact and not rely on here-say. Unfortunately Khalsa Aid has not done this and provided a very biased posting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use