Jump to content

Parable Of The Gardener


Recommended Posts

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

I'm studying philosophy and ethics at the moment and have come across something that has some what challenged my thinking. Whilst studying the topic of religious language I came across Antony Flew. He argues that a religious individual dies a 'death of a thousand qualifications'. This is his his interpretation of John Wisdom's parable of the gardener. To some it up, basically two individuals are travelling and come across a well kept garden in a clearing of a woods. The believer argues there must be a gardener to maintain it and the other says there is no empirical proof. They both camp to see if a gardener appears but no sign. However the believer continuously justifies reasons for his existence; saying he is invisible and undetectable. He compares this to a believer of God. How they justify God's existence through any means.

I don't know what to make of this. Would be grateful for someone to give me a Sikhi prospective on this please. :blink2:

Fateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well according to sikhi and grbani there are three main deaths

one is death of the body the physical which is nothing and all who walk this earth will face this death

two is a death of zameer or spirit ,when someone can be beautiful smart rich but still they do not live inside, they dont have union with God and their spirit is dead while they are alive, most of the world is dead in this death

the third death is a death that some rare and lucky people have faced and it is death of the nijj, the self, the mind, the ego , this death is blessed because in death of the ego lies life of the soul, this is when people realize ananad and they can see and expiriance God within them - Sikhism is not about believing in the gardener, Sikhism is about expiriancing, through loving devotional worship, when Guru Gobind Singh Ji talks about who a Khalsa is his first condition is jagat jot, one whose inner light (ie the soul the image of God) is awakened, so one who has expirienced God, its not about waiting for the gardener Gurbani tells us Turak na chaa bharmiya chaa- dont kill your doubts (on rituals on God on logic) but kill doubt it self (expiriance Gods love so no doubt remains)- here both those in the garden are looking outwards to justify God to others, in Sikhi there is no need, you must look inwards to find God in yourself and once this happens your need to show other and be right will itself go away

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Khalsa Ji

In order to see the creator one must first recognise oneself. Milk contains butter but we cannot see it. Wood contains fire but we can't see it. The creator exists within us but the milk needs to first churned. The wood needs to rubbed in order to produce fire. In order to see the creator there has to be a desire but unfortunately the mind desires lust , anger , ego , attachment , and greed etc. I. e . there is. no room for Prakash to take place. The mind is full to the brim with materialism , just need to make room for some spirituality and then one will start to see the creator everywhere.

Waheguru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

waheguru ji there's one sakhi....

one mahatma is doing the bhagti and a man mukh came and said if God exits then he show show him. Mahatma ji said ke God can be felt but not seen like materialistic things........but manmukh kept asking the same.......when Mahatma ji realized that this person won't understand like this.....he picked up a stone and threw at the manmukh.....manmukh got hurt on his forehead......Manmukh abused mahatma ji for what he had done....mahatma ji said why are you abusing me for...what have I done.....manmukh said you hurt me ..mahatma ji said where...he said on the forehead...mahhtma ji said he can't see anything...manmukh said he's feeling pain....mahatma ji asked him to show pain...manmukh said are you mad....how can pain be seen....mahatma ji then said same way God can not be seen but he's everywhere........taking care of each and everything beyond our expectation........

attributes.... nirgun saroop of waheguru ji.....just parkash..... need kirpa to see and feel it....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

brilliant question,

if i have understood this correctly than the flew is basically saying that the other person who views the garden doesnt suggest a gardener but once the religious person who initially stated there had to be a gardener comes up short he then "qualifies" this by adding on modifications to prove he is right.

I dont think ive ever read anything in sikhi in regard to this mainly because i imagine it being an atheist argument. But in sikhi our statements are qualified to us already w have not had to make further qualifications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

brilliant question,

if i have understood this correctly than the flew is basically saying that the other person who views the garden doesnt suggest a gardener but once the religious person who initially stated there had to be a gardener comes up short he then "qualifies" this by adding on modifications to prove he is right.

I dont think ive ever read anything in sikhi in regard to this mainly because i imagine it being an atheist argument. But in sikhi our statements are qualified to us already w have not had to make further qualifications.

Thanks.... My insight on this is a lot clearer now :biggrin2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turak na chaa bharmiya chaa-<br />

Could you provide us with the ang of maharaj where this is from Teji Kaur bhen ji?</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seekinglight ji.......to add .....ik maa vi gardner hi hundi hai jo apne fulaan varge bacheyaan nu paaldi posdi hai.......ik teacher vi gardner hai jo ena phul booyteya nu pani naal sinjda hai, spiritual guru, mahatma, mahapurkh vi gardner han jo ena phulaan di anderli bhukh mitaunde han naam japake........eh sare waheguru ji de sargun sarrop han, ik maa, teacher te mahapurkhaan de roop vich.........ona da nirgun saroop har thaan vicher reha, oh sadi odon vi sambaal karda jadon sargun saroop vich koi maali kol na howe.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Uncle, realistically are you gonna challenge it in real life? I could fully jhatka and eat a steak wearing Bana bilkul tere samne but on God you could do nothing about that 😂
    • Flintstone Saab, can't you type in one message? Or must you drop the full Godfather trilogy with every response, minimum 3 responses? 1) They don't jhatka cows at Hazur Sahib because it's in a country called "India", in a state called "Maharashtra" - and beef is strictly illegal there 2) I said a quote from Adi/Dasam Granth saying "you can't eat beef" - "protection of cows" could be Maharaj talking about defending them for Hindus, same reason we do Aarti-Aarta. If u reference a quote, u gotta say the context of the verse. Otherwise there are verses in SGGS Ji which seemingly tell you to convert to Islam; of course that's not what Maharaj is saying but without context many quotes from Baani seem misleading 3) Why does 90% of your "evidence" come from living people, like "the head of Taruna Dal" or "Baba Pala Singh" - very rarely (like less than 10%) of it is from the Gurus' direct words. Do you realise that these people are humans with flaws/bias? Maharaj ended the line of human Gurus for a reason 4) Funnily enough, even Budha Dal's maryada in the Sundar gutka does not ban beef. If individual Akaalis taboo it, that doesn't mean it's the actual hukam lol 5) You mention Naamdharis guarding cows but they are also vegetarians who do not carry a kirpan and say Guru Granth Sahib Ji is not a Guru - using them as an example is funny 😂   6) Bro who uses "diapers" and "mate" in the same sentence? 😂 Man really tried sounding like Andrew Tate with the British/American accent mix 7) So you're about 30 years old and still beefing strangers online? Brooooo where's your MOTHER, did Aunty Ji never shout you away from ur keyboard? "Oy Flentstone puttar, thalle aa hun, roti ban gyi!!!!" 8 ) Wait since you're some Uncle, how do you balance work life with ur keyboard warrior shift? Or do u just sit vailah at home, like unemployed? SERIOUS QUESTION: Is your account rank on this forum the only thing on your CV ?😂😂😂  9) Can you imagine Maharaj condoning you calling me names like "mughal"? You keep reading about these "heads of Taruna Dal" but you need to google "Guru Nanak Dev Ji's teachings on kindness and anger" instead - you're basically trying to solve degree level maths equations when you can't even understand "1 + 1 = 2"  (prediction - I bet he's gonna respond debating one little detail of this post like my joke about accents, but fully miss the bigger picture, or get upset again. He also will likely reference another "sant" or author, or pull a random quote completely out of context😂)
    • ਕੇਵਲ ਰਾਮ ਨਾਮੁ ਮਨਿ ਵਸਿਆ ਨਾਮੇ ਹੀ ਮੁਕਤਿ ਪਾਈ ॥ Kaeval Raam Naam Man Vasiaa Naamae Hee Mukath Paaee || केवल राम नामु मनि वसिआ नामे ही मुकति पाई ॥ The Naam, the Name of the Lord alone abides in the mind; and through the Naam, the Name of the Lord, one finds liberation.
    • Shame if our past these modern days jatts sgpc lost are . One question I have is...where were the Nihangs and the anti jar Seva when anandgarh was town down and kshgarh remade to what it is now....mughals couldn't even destroy the qila. Yet we did at multiple places with our own hands..shame on sangat flr not stopping precious ones and lakh lanat to the destructors of Sikh puratan asthaans all these kar Seva babeh of the past 
    • Reason behind it is.  You can't get mass sangat in to fill the golak up.... that's why they are all the same in design etc .probs some mafia rAcket related to the mass marbeling of gurughars. Such a shame. Hardly any pictures of the original anandgar qila..only one in the toor collection 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use