Jump to content

Truth About Interfaith Marriages


singhbj singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just saw that and oh dear another face in palm moment he totally ruined the sikh image by clashing with presenter and issuing a protest at the end when they had finished the topic on the issue.

I agree he wasn't given a chance to air his views the 4 non-sikhs guests there were hostile and keen to bash the Sikh protestors but jagmeet should have remained slient and retained his composure rather than giving a negative impression of turbanned Sikhs that jagmeet has now left many viewers.

The BBC deliberately choses Sikhs like non-british born jagmeet who may have the passion for the cause but have low IQ's and understanding how the white british atheist christian. / jewish media works to air their views because they want to give the narrative that only m0ronic thugs are protesting.

We need better, media savvy Sikhs. They need to have special training to be able to answer these typical questions and the approach these kind of people.

The BBC has an agenda and propagates it. You need to challenge it accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jagmeet Singh probably wasn't the right person for that programme. He wandered off the topic and missed critical points like saying clearly Rehit Maryada, rehitnamas, 52 hukums, akal Takht hukumnama all clarify the issue that interfaith marriages are not allowed.

They should have had jagraj Singh on there instead.

I think even if jagraj singh was there they would have still giving him a hard time and not let him speak, had it been a jew there a muslim there or a catholic there who are all against inter-faith marriages in their religions they would have had an easier ride so basically those non-sikhs there had an anti-sikh agenda. But aslo because when they see the turban and huge beard they automatically have hate in their hearts and negative connotations because of the whole muslims and islamic terrorists ruining the turban and beard image. So to give the right impression to the wider audience is an important step which jagmeet missed totally.

There should have been a confident and wise turbanned Sikh there or a Sehajdhari Sikh there who is well versed with Sikhi and has a high IQ and media savy. The problems within Sikh circles is that often the most passionate Sikh with low IQ and no media understanding gets to be put forward for hugely important issues of being spokesmen or representatives for the community and they tend to mess things up big time just like we saw here.

The BBC and other western white outlets wont stop getting pendu's to represent the Sikh community because their agenda is to show our community as in a negative light as possible. That's just how their covert racism works

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think even if jagraj singh was there they would have still giving him a hard time and not let him speak, had it been a jew there a muslim there or a catholic there who are all against inter-faith marriages in their religions they would have had an easier ride so basically those non-sikhs there had an anti-sikh agenda. But aslo because when they see the turban and huge beard they automatically have hate in their hearts and negative connotations because of the whole muslims and islamic terrorists ruining the turban and beard image. So to give the right impression to the wider audience is an important step which jagmeet missed totally.

There should have been a confident and wise turbanned Sikh there or a Sehajdhari Sikh there who is well versed with Sikhi and has a high IQ and media savy. The problems within Sikh circles is that often the most passionate Sikh with low IQ and no media understanding gets to be put forward for hugely important issues of being spokesmen or representatives for the community and they tend to mess things up big time just like we saw here.

The BBC and other western white outlets wont stop getting pendu's to represent the Sikh community because their agenda is to show our community as in a negative light as possible. That's just how their covert racism works

You tackle the BBC by using it's PC credentials against it self by giving it cognitive dissonance.

There needs to be a female Sikh spokesperson, because by doing that it cuts off the feminist agenda. Even better would be a White Sikh female.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sikh Married to Christian and Fought Everyday!

http://www.interfaithshaadi.org/blog/?p=10611

Hardly a revelation is it.

So called sikhs fight in same faith marriages. How many are atheists and don't go to Gurdwara, just like their parents didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Mind is Jyot Saroop (Waheguru), but the mind is under the influence of five evils… Through Naam Simran( Rememberance), the mind will begin to detach from evil, and get back to its original form ( MANN TU JYOT SAROOP HEH)… Until the mind breaks free from the five evils, one will go through the cycle of paap and punn….which leads to Karma… Naam Simran destroys past karma, and prevents new karma coming into fruition… I did this, I did that… This non realisation of the Jyot Saroop gives rise to paap and Punn, which in turn gives birth to suffering and misery…
    • I agree we're not born with sin like the Christians think. Also I agree we have effects of karma. But Gurbani does state that the body contains both sin and charity (goodness): ਕਾਇਆ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਪਾਪੁ ਪੁੰਨੁ ਦੁਇ ਭਾਈ ॥ Within the body are the two brothers sin and virtue. p126 Actually, we do need to be saved. Gurbani calls this "udhaar" (uplift). Without Satguru, souls are liable to spiritual death: ਜਿਨਾ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨ ਭੇਟਿਓ ਸੇ ਭਾਗਹੀਣ ਵਸਿ ਕਾਲ ॥ p40 Those who have not met Satguru Purakh are unfortunate and liable to death. So, yeah, we do need to be saved, and Guru ji does the saving. The reason Satguru is the one to save is because God has given Satguru the "key" (kunji): ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਥਿ ਕੁੰਜੀ ਹੋਰਤੁ ਦਰੁ ਖੁਲੈ ਨਾਹੀ ਗੁਰੁ ਪੂਰੈ ਭਾਗਿ ਮਿਲਾਵਣਿਆ ॥੭॥ In the True Guru's hand is the key. None else can open the door. By perfect good fortune the Guru is met. p124
    • That's unfortunate to hear. Could you give any more information? Who was this "baba"? He just disappeared with people's money? Obviously, you should donate your money to known institutions or poor people that you can verify the need of through friends and family in Punjab.
    • Sangat ji,  I know a family who went Sevewal to do seva sometimes end of 2019. They returned last year in great dismay and heart broken.  To repent for their mistakes they approached panj pyaare. The Panj gave them their punishment / order to how t make it up which, with Kirpa, they fulfilled.  They were listening to a fake Baba who, in the end, took all the "Donations " and fled sometime over a year ago. For nearly 4 years this family (who are great Gursikhs once u get to know them) wasted time and effort for this fake Baba. NOT ONLY this one fam. But many, many did worldwide and they took their fam to do seva, in village Sevewal, city Jaitho in Punjab. In the end many families lost money in thousands being behind this Baba. The family, on return, had to get in touch with all the participants and told them to stop.  I am stating this here to create awareness and we need to learn from whom we follow and believe. It's no easy but if we follow the 3 S (Sangat, Simran and Seva) we will be shown the light. As I am writing this the family in question have been doing the same since 2008 onwards and they fell for this Baba... it is unbelievable and shocking.  This am writing in a nutshell as am at work on my break so not lengthy but it deserves a great length.  Especially the family in question, who shed light on youngsters about Sikhi 20 plus years!! 
    • Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi Kalan uses simple Punjabi.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use