Jump to content

Why I'm not going to listen to few Sikhs asking me not to celebrate Diwali


singhbj singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Jacfsing2
1 hour ago, singhbj singh said:

Daas wouldn't celebrate Christmas, Easter, or any other Non-Sikh religious holiday. We have much more bigger things to do, let the Non-Sikhs do what they want, but it's not us. One of the Hindu Gods, Krishna, was playing around like a gay guy with Kansa Kesh and killed the man, would any Gursikh tolerate Kesh beadbi, regardless whether they were good or not. (And yes it's true Krishna was playing around with Kansa Kesh and took his Kesh and played around so much that it killed him).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His reasoning is based on a false premise.  He states:

Quote

It (Diwali), would help me evolve as a universal human - and that essentially is the message of the Guru Granth Sahib.

Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji does not teach to be a universal human.  Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji teaches a person to follow the teaches of gurmat and become a Sikh.  Sakhi of Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji rejecting the janeu is widely known.  The sakhi tells us, Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji did not accept the janeu, which was a Brahmin celebration festival.  Notice how the writer never writes how he would celebrate Diwali.  Ask these guys why are they celebrating and they won't know why.  Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji taught Sikhs to be mindful of their actions.  Also notice how such writers never write to tell why they would be celebrating the release of Sri Guru Hargobind Sahib ji even though the Indian government will not be.  This writer mind is enslaved to the materialistic world.  He knew the materialistic world would approve of his message and he catered to them.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Daas wouldn't celebrate Christmas, Easter, or any other Non-Sikh religious holiday. We have much more bigger things to do, let the Non-Sikhs do what they want, but it's not us. One of the Hindu Gods, Krishna, was playing around like a gay guy with Kansa Kesh and killed the man, would any Gursikh tolerate Kesh beadbi, regardless whether they were good or not. (And yes it's true Krishna was playing around with Kansa Kesh and took his Kesh and played around so much that it killed him).

It is not gay thing because Guru Sahib says in Chandi Di Vaar that Krishan recieved his power from Vaheguru that he was able to defeat Kans by grabbing his kesh and throwing him. Kans was a paapi who did not even spare babies and killed them ruthlessly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Preeet said:

Omg, how can you say that about someone, especially the satguru of dwapur yugam who SAVED humans from his wrath?? Sri Krishna has more gyan than all of us here, live by hum nehi chunga bura nehi koi! Not by saying they are bad and I'm bad too.

Where in Gurbani has Vaheguru ever given the title of Satguru to Krishna?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Preeet said:

ਦੁਆਪੁਰਿ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਰੀ ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨ ਹਾਹਾ ਹਰਿ ਹਰਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਜਪਾਵੈ।
Duaapari Satigur Haree Krisan Haahaa Hari Hari Naamu Japaavai.
दुआपरि सतिगुर हरी क्रिसन हाहा हरि हरि नामु जपावै ।
The true Guru of dvapar is said to be Harikrsna and ‘H’ of Vahiguru reminds of Hari.
2 ਵਾਰਾਂ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰਦਾਸ : ਵਾਰ ੧ ਪਉੜੀ ੪੯ ਪੰ. ੨

Followers of Sri Guru Sahib ji can interpret it as they'd like.

Krishna in Gurbani, by Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji has been criticized for calling himself great because he, Krishna is great because he put a nose ring in a king cobra. Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji mocks Krushna and says vaheguru can do many great things; your 'achievement' is nothing. So we can interpret Gurbani as we like???? What is this Lord of the rings and the Gods are battling each other.  Will one satguru critically insult another Satguru actions.  Maybe in your folklore beliefs but never in Sikhi because Satguru is NEVER wrong.  But Krishna has been shown to be wrong by Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Preeet said:

Dear, the route of actions is through Sri Vaheguru Sahib ji, what needs to be understood is that everything done by Sri Krishna ji was in hukam, as you too are part of hukam. So rather than defaming others, why not accept the belief that all are pure due to all actions being from Sri Vaheguru Sahib ji. Forget duality(which is the reason for all pain).

ਆਪੇ ਸੁਣਿ ਸਭ ਵੇਖਦਾ ਪਿਆਰਾ ਮੁਖਿ ਬੋਲੇ ਆਪਿ ਮੁਹਾਹੁ ॥
आपे सुणि सभ वेखदा पिआरा मुखि बोले आपि मुहाहु ॥
Āpe suṇ sabẖ vekẖ▫ḏā pi▫ārā mukẖ bole āp muhāhu.
The Beloved Himself sees and hears everything; He Himself speaks through the mouths of all beings.
 

I didn't criticize Krishna in Gurbani.  Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji criticized Krishna for saying he's powerful by putting a ring in a king cobra.  By your above post you are saying Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji was in duality.  You are the most deluded poster I have yet to witness here.  Even the missionaries are better than you.  You insult Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji to protect your fault filled Krishna.  You are a Hindu becUse only a thief would insult Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Preeet said:

& that's okay for anyone to think this about my soul. Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji agrees with hum nahi chunga bura nahi koi (thus no duality), so I have a benti that you should refrain from speaking harsh words towards anyone, and anything. 

Do you have any remorse or apology for saying Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji is in duality for criticizing Krishna in Gurbani and Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji did not realize that all actions are in hukam of Vaheguru?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
On 10/31/2016 at 6:52 PM, Jonny101 said:

It is not gay thing because Guru Sahib says in Chandi Di Vaar that Krishan recieved his power from Vaheguru that he was able to defeat Kans by grabbing his kesh and throwing him. Kans was a paapi who did not even spare babies and killed them ruthlessly.

Honestly respect your answer more than Preet, because you at least don't call Krishna God, Chandi Di Vaar says Indra was a coward who needed some help from some other person not even related to his kingdom. If you realize there used to a picture in some Gurdwara where it showed all 330 million Hindu/(False), gods bowing to the great Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji, (Vaheguru in Sargun Form) but it was later removed by the "All religions are equal" batch of Sikhs, Are you one of those Sikhs who believe all religions are equal, or do you believe in actually saying there is no one greater than Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji? (By the way even Krishna bows to Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji among those in the picture, and how else was he going to get his powers?)

15 hours ago, Preeet said:

Omg, how can you say that about someone, especially the satguru of dwapur yugam who SAVED humans from his wrath?? Sri Krishna has more gyan than all of us here, live by hum nehi chunga bura nehi koi! Not by saying they are bad and I'm bad too.

Where does it say he was Satguru of Dwapur? If your referring to the Gurmantar being revealed in Bhai Gurdas Ji Di Vaaran, you might want to understand that Gurdas wasn't bowing to Krishna, but rather saying all the other yugs failed in the aspect of Vaheguru being Pargat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree we're not born with sin like the Christians think. Also I agree we have effects of karma. But Gurbani does state that the body contains both sin and charity (goodness): ਕਾਇਆ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਪਾਪੁ ਪੁੰਨੁ ਦੁਇ ਭਾਈ ॥ Within the body are the two brothers sin and virtue. p126 Actually, we do need to be saved. Gurbani calls this "udhaar" (uplift). Without Satguru, souls are liable to spiritual death: ਜਿਨਾ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨ ਭੇਟਿਓ ਸੇ ਭਾਗਹੀਣ ਵਸਿ ਕਾਲ ॥ p40 Those who have not met Satguru Purakh are unfortunate and liable to death. So, yeah, we do need to be saved, and Guru ji does the saving. The reason Satguru is the one to save is because God has given Satguru the "key" (kunji): ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਥਿ ਕੁੰਜੀ ਹੋਰਤੁ ਦਰੁ ਖੁਲੈ ਨਾਹੀ ਗੁਰੁ ਪੂਰੈ ਭਾਗਿ ਮਿਲਾਵਣਿਆ ॥੭॥ In the True Guru's hand is the key. None else can open the door. By perfect good fortune the Guru is met. p124
    • That's unfortunate to hear. Could you give any more information? Who was this "baba"? He just disappeared with people's money? Obviously, you should donate your money to known institutions or poor people that you can verify the need of through friends and family in Punjab.
    • Sangat ji,  I know a family who went Sevewal to do seva sometimes end of 2019. They returned last year in great dismay and heart broken.  To repent for their mistakes they approached panj pyaare. The Panj gave them their punishment / order to how t make it up which, with Kirpa, they fulfilled.  They were listening to a fake Baba who, in the end, took all the "Donations " and fled sometime over a year ago. For nearly 4 years this family (who are great Gursikhs once u get to know them) wasted time and effort for this fake Baba. NOT ONLY this one fam. But many, many did worldwide and they took their fam to do seva, in village Sevewal, city Jaitho in Punjab. In the end many families lost money in thousands being behind this Baba. The family, on return, had to get in touch with all the participants and told them to stop.  I am stating this here to create awareness and we need to learn from whom we follow and believe. It's no easy but if we follow the 3 S (Sangat, Simran and Seva) we will be shown the light. As I am writing this the family in question have been doing the same since 2008 onwards and they fell for this Baba... it is unbelievable and shocking.  This am writing in a nutshell as am at work on my break so not lengthy but it deserves a great length.  Especially the family in question, who shed light on youngsters about Sikhi 20 plus years!! 
    • Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi Kalan uses simple Punjabi.
    • Leaving aside Guru ji, the general question of taking afeem (opium) in limited quantities for war/medical wounds is simply unproblematic. When you go to the hospital, they give you morphine. What do you think morphine is? It's an opiate. Even codeine (cough syrup) is an opiate! Ever had a cough? Granted, it is against Gurmat to take opium or other drugs for the fun of it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use